Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing the provision of cancer nutrition information to support care through experience-based co-design: a mixed-methods study

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nutrition is essential within cancer care, yet patient and carer access to nutrition care and information is variable. This study aimed to (1) investigate patient and carer access and perceptions, and health professional views and practices, relating to cancer nutrition information and care; and (2) co-design interactive resources to support optimal nutrition care.

Methods

Patients and carers completed a survey regarding access to nutrition care and information. Seven multidisciplinary health service teams were invited to participate in a survey and focus group to assess barriers and enablers in nutrition practices. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed. Eligible patients, carers, and health professionals were invited to four virtual workshops utilizing experience-based co-design methods to identify nutrition priority areas and design resources. Workshop participant acceptability of the resources was measured.

Results

Of 104 consumer survey respondents (n = 97 patients, n = 7 carers), 61% agreed that it “took too much time to find evidence-based nutrition and cancer information”, and 46% had seen a dietitian. Thirty-four of 38 health professionals completed the survey and 30 participated in a focus group, and it was identified the greatest barriers to delivering nutrition care were lack of referral services, knowledge or skill gaps, and time. Twenty participants (n = 10 patients and carers, n = 10 health professionals) attended four workshops and co-designed a suite of 46 novel resources rated as highly acceptable.

Conclusion

Improved communication, training, and availability of suitable resources could improve access to and support cancer nutrition information and care. New, co-designed cancer nutrition resources were created and deemed highly acceptable to patients, carers, and health professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors have full control of the data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

Abbreviations

CanEAT:

The CanEAT pathway

EBCD:

Experienced-based co-design

GP:

General practitioner

HP:

Health professional

MDT:

Multidisciplinary team

REDCap:

Research electronic data capture

References

  1. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F et al (2017) ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr 36(1):11–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall KM, Loeliger J, Nolte L, Kelaart A, Kiss NK (2019) Prevalence of malnutrition and impact on clinical outcomes in cancer services: a comparison of two time points. Clin Nutr 38(2):644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prado CM, Laviano A, Gillis C, Sung AD, Gardner M, Yalcin S et al (2022) Examining guidelines and new evidence in oncology nutrition: a position paper on gaps and opportunities in multimodal approaches to improve patient care. Support Care Cancer 30(4):3073–3083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiss N, Loeliger J, Findlay M, Isenring E, Baguley BJ, Boltong A et al (2020) Clinical Oncology Society of Australia: position statement on cancer-related malnutrition and sarcopenia. Nutr Diet 77(4):416–425

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP et al (2017) ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr 36(5):1187–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loeliger J, Dewar S, Kiss N, Drosdowsky A, Stewart J (2021) Patient and carer experiences of nutrition in cancer care: a mixed-methods study. Support Care Cancer 29(9):5475–5485

  7. Baguley BJ, Benna-Doyle S, Drake S, Curtis A, Stewart J, Loeliger J (2023) Access to nutrition services and information after active cancer treatment: a mixed methods study. J Cancer Surviv 18(1):176–185

  8. Maschke J, Kruk U, Kastrati K, Kleeberg J, Buchholz D, Erickson N et al (2017) Nutritional care of cancer patients: a survey on patients’ needs and medical care in reality. Int J Clin Oncol 22(1):200–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loeliger J, Dewar S, Kiss N, Dumbrell J, Elliott A, Kaegi K et al (2023) Co-design of a cancer nutrition care pathway by patients, carers, and health professionals: the CanEAT pathway. Support Care Cancer 31(2):99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Warner EL, Basen-Engquist KM, Badger TA, Crane TE, Raber-Ramsey M (2022) The online cancer nutrition misinformation: a framework of behavior change based on exposure to cancer nutrition misinformation. Cancer 128(13):2540–2548

  11. Kiss N, Bauer J, Boltong A, Brown T, Isenring L, Loeliger J et al (2020) Awareness, perceptions and practices regarding cancer-related malnutrition and sarcopenia: a survey of cancer clinicians. Support Care Cancer 28(11):5263–5270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tay BSJ, Cox DN, Brinkworth GD, Davis A, Edney SM, Gwilt I et al (2021) Co-design practices in diet and nutrition research: an integrative review. Nutrients 13(10):3593

  13. Donetto S, Pierri P, Tsianakas V, Robert G (2015) Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realizing participatory design in the public sector. Des J 18:227–248

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sullivan ES, Rice N, Kingston E, Kelly A, Reynolds JV, Feighan J et al (2021) A national survey of oncology survivors examining nutrition attitudes, problems and behaviours, and access to dietetic care throughout the cancer journey. Clin Nutr ESPEN 41:331–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trujillo EB, Dixon SW, Claghorn K, Levin RM, Mills JB, Spees CK (2018) Closing the gap in nutrition care at outpatient cancer centers: ongoing initiatives of the oncology nutrition dietetic practice group. J Acad Nutr Diet 118(4):749–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bate P, Robert G (2006) Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 15(5):307–310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Iedema R, Merrick E, Piper D, Britton K, Gray J, Verma R et al (2010) Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services: the architecture of deliberation. J Appl Behav Sci 46(1):73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsianakas V, Robert G, Maben J, Richardson A, Dale C, Griffin M et al (2012) Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. Support Care Cancer 20(11):2639–2647

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Piper D, Iedema R, Gray J, Verma R, Holmes L, Manning N (2012) Utilizing experience-based co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study. Health Serv Manage Res 25(4):162–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brady GC, Goodrich J, Roe JWG (2020) Using experience-based co-design to improve the pre-treatment care pathway for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Support Care Cancer 28(2):739–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Green T, Bonner A, Teleni L, Bradford N, Purtell L, Douglas C et al (2020) Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 29(1):64–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G (2014) Using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. King’s College London. Available at: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/nnru/publications/reports/ebcd-where-are-we-now-report.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2022

  23. Tang CY, Turczyniak M, Sayner A, Haines K, Butzkueven S, O’Connell HE (2020) Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology. Support Care Cancer 28(11):5195–5202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, Purushotham A, Sturmey G, Gager M (2015) Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ 350:g7714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 25(12):986–92

  26. Braun V, Clarke V (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 11(4):589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ (2017) Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1):88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Muscaritoli M, Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H et al (2021) ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in cancer. Clin Nutr 40(5):2898–2913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson KL, Elliott L, Fuchs-Tarlovsky V, Levin RM, Voss AC, Piemonte T (2017) Oncology evidence-based nutrition practice guideline for adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 117(2):297-310.e47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keller HH, McCullough J, Davidson B, Vesnaver E, Laporte M, Gramlich L et al (2015) The integrated nutrition pathway for acute care (INPAC): building consensus with a modified Delphi. Nutr J 14(1):63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsianakas V, Robert G, Richardson A, Verity R, Oakley C, Murrells T et al (2015) Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff. Support Care Cancer 23(10):3069–3080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants who completed the surveys, participated in focus groups and/or the co-design workshops. In addition, a special mention for contributions provided by the Victorian Government, project steering committee members, Victorian Cancer Malnutrition Collaborative project team, and the health services who participated as an implementation team (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Vincent’s Health Melbourne, Goulbourn Valley Health, Eastern Health, Access and Community Health, healthAbility, Deepdene Surgery).

Funding

This work was supported by a grant received by the project team from the Victorian Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material presentation, data collection and analysis were performed by Jenelle Loeliger and Rebecca McIntosh. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jenelle Loeliger and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenelle Loeliger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was received from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/74010/PMCC-2021).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained through a participant information sheet prior to commencing the surveys (in the Research Electronic Data Capture), in written form prior to participating in the focus groups and obtained in verbal and written form for the co-design workshops.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Jenelle Loeliger and Rebecca McIntosh received a salary from the grant received for this work. Nicole Kiss and Jenelle Loeliger are unpaid members of the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Nutrition Executive Committee. Rebecca McIntosh is an unpaid member of the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Cancer Survivorship Executive Committee. Nicole Kiss has received research support from each of The Victorian Cancer Agency, Medical Nutrition Industry, World Cancer Research Funds, Medical Research Future Fund, Amgen OA-ANZBMS and Honorarium from Abbott Australasia. Nicole Kiss received a speaking fee from Dietitian Connection. Nicole Kiss is an unpaid member of the Nursing and Allied Health Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loeliger, J., Francis, J., Kiss, N. et al. Enhancing the provision of cancer nutrition information to support care through experience-based co-design: a mixed-methods study. Support Care Cancer 32, 257 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08453-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08453-y

Keywords

Navigation