Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development and implementation of a volunteer lay navigation competency framework at an outpatient cancer center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the development and delivery of a competency framework designed to guide the recruitment, training, and competency screening of volunteer lay navigators at an outpatient cancer centre in Victoria, BC.

Methods

Volunteers that passed a screening interview underwent 22 h of training focusing on the scope of the navigator’s role, communication skills, and cancer center processes and resources. Volunteers that passed a post-training interview, by demonstrating a basic level of competency in three domains (Self as Navigator, Communication, and Knowledge/Information), were invited to participate as volunteer lay navigators in a three-step intervention with newly diagnosed lung cancer patients at the British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre.

Results

Of the 27 volunteers who attended a screening interview, 20 were invited to participate in training. From the subset of 20, 13 of these participants achieved competency scores high enough to qualify them to practice as volunteer lay navigators.

Conclusions

By incorporating the lessons we have learned from this study, we believe that the lay navigation competency framework serves as a useful model for selecting, training, and supporting competent navigators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson DE, Mooney D, Peterson S (2007) University of British Columbia Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. Patient experiences with ambulatory cancer care in British Columbia, 2005/06. Vancouver, BC: Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. www.chspr.ubc.ca/pubs/report/patient-experiences-ambulatory-cancer-care-british-columbia-200506

  2. Guide to implementing navigation [Internet]: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2010 [updated January 2010; cited August 21, 2013]. Available from: http://www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca/wp-content/uploads/2.4.0.1.4.7-Guide_Implementation_Navigation.pdf

  3. Fillion L, de Serres M, Cook S, Goupil RL, Bairati I, Doll R (2009) Professional patient navigation in head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 25(3):212–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman HP (2006) Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health 83(2):139–41

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohenadel J, Kaegi E, Laidlaw J, Kovacik G, Cortinois A, Kang R, Jadad AR (2007) Leveling the playing field: the personal coach program as an innovative approach to assess and address the supportive care needs of underserved cancer patients. J Support Oncol 5(4):185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shelton RC, Thompson HS, Jandorf L, Varela A, Oliveri B, Villagra C, Valdimarsdottir HB, Redd WH (2011) Training experiences of lay and professional patient navigators for colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 26(2):277–84

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lorhan S, Cleghorn L, Fitch M, Pang K, McAndrew A, Applin-Poole J, Ledwell E, Mitchell R, Wright M (2013) Moving the agenda forward for cancer patient navigation: understanding volunteer and peer navigation approaches. J Cancer Educ 1–8

  8. Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M (2008) Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 70(3):315–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nissim R, Regehr M, Rozmovits L, Rodin G (2009) Transforming the experience of cancer care: a qualitative study of a hospital-based volunteer psychosocial support service. Support Care Cancer 17(7):801–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinnane NA, Waters T, Aranda S (2011) Evaluation of a pilot ‘peer support’ training programme for volunteers in a hospital-based cancer information and support centre. Support Care Cancer 19(1):81–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handy F, Srinivasan N (2004) Valuing volunteers: an economic evaluation of the net benefits of hospital volunteers. Nonprof Volunt Sec Q 33(1):28–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Macvean ML, White VM, Sanson-Fisher R (2008) One-to-one volunteer support programs for people with cancer: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 70(1):10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. White VM, Macvean ML, Grogan S, D'Este C, Akkerman D, Ieropoli S, Hill DJ, Sanson-Fisher R (2012) Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncol 21(10):1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Crossley M (2007) Participation, roles, and the dynamics of change in a group-delivered self-management course for people living with HIV. Qual Health Res 17(6):744–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosma H, Johnston M, Cadell S, Wainwright W, Abernathy N, Feron, A, Kelley ML, Nelson F. (2008) Canadian social work competencies for hospice palliative care: a framework to guide education and practice at the generalist and specialist levels. Social Work Competencies for Hospice Palliative Care. pmj.sagepub.com/content/24/1/79

  16. Van Leeuwen R (2008) Towards nursing competencies in spiritual care. Thesis University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  17. Collins S, Hiebert B (2002) Developing a competency framework for career counselor training. University of Calgary. contactpoint.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/pdf-02-08.pdf

  18. Bosma H, Johnston M, Cadell S, Wainwright W, Abernathy N, Feron A, Kelley ML, Nelson F (2010) Creating social work competencies for practice in hospice palliative care. Palliative Med 24(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowling A, Newman K, Leigh S (1999) Developing a competency framework to support training in evidence-based healthcare. Int J Health Care Qual Assoc 12(4):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, Kokotailo P, Gruppen L (2008) Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ 42(3):248–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruppen LD, Mangrulkar RS, Kolars JC (2012) The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for improving global health. Hum Resour Health 10(1):43

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Calhoun JG, Davidson PL, Sinioris ME, Vincent ET, Griffith JR (2002) Toward an understanding of competency identification and assessment in health care management. Qual Manag Health Care 11(1):14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McClelland DC (1998) Identifying competencies with behavioural-event interviews. Psychol Sci 9(5):331–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brownson RC, Ballew P, Kittur ND, Elliott MB, Haire-Joshu D, Krebill H, Kreuter MW (2009) Developing competencies for training practitioners in evidence-based cancer control. J Cancer Educ 24(3):186–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Speroff T, O'Connor GT (2004) Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research. Quality Manag Health Care 13(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thangaratinam S, Redman CW (2005) The Delphi technique. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 7(2):120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang J, Kim Y, Yoo YS, Choi JY, Koh SJ, Jho HJ, Choi YS, Park J, Moon do H, Kim do Y, Jung y, Kim WC, Lim SH, Hwang SJ, Choe SO, Jones D (2013) Developing competencies for multidisciplinary hospice and palliative care professionals in Korea. Support Care Cancer, 1-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23708823

  28. Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians: Tables report [Internet]: Statistics Canada, Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division; 2010. [updated March, 2012; cited October 22, 2013]. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-649-x/89-649-x2011001-eng.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Lay Navigation Study research team would like to acknowledge the generous support of our funders: the British Columbia Cancer Foundation and the Canadian Partnership against Cancer. In particular, we would like to thank all of our patients, volunteers, community members, and British Columbia Cancer Agency staff, without whom this study would not have been possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. They authors also have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun Lorhan.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix A

Screening Tool for Lay Navigation Volunteers

Applicant Name___________________ Interviewer Name(s)__________________

Date of Interview__________________

  1. 1.

    You’ve received materials about the role and program, what excites you about the lay navigation position?

  2. 2.

    What skills/life experience do you bring to this position that you think would be helpful?

  3. 3.

    Reflecting on your previous work/volunteer positions, describe your most positive experience with supervision, and an experience that did not work as well for you.

  4. 4.

    How have you managed the challenges of confidentiality—running in to people you know, seeing patients outside the centre, friends/family who inquire about patients

  5. 5.

    Scenario: You are on the phone for the first time with a patient. Role play your response to the following:

    Patient: “Since the doctor told me I have cancer I’m having a lot of trouble thinking. I can’t concentrate at work. I just feel numb inside.”

  6. 6.

    Scenario: You are meeting with a patient. Role play your response to the following:

    Patient: “Have you had an experience with cancer? What was it like for you?”

  7. 7.

    Scenario: You are waiting for a lung cancer patient who is 15 minutes late. He comes in the door smelling of smoke and struggling to catch his breath. Role play your response to the following:

    Patient: “Sorry I’m late, I had to stop and get cigarettes.”

  8. 8.

    Scenario: It is your final phone contact with the patient. Role play your response to the following:

    Patient: “I really want to thank you for all of your support. I don’t know how I would have gotten through this without you. I would really like to be able to stay in touch in case there are more questions I have. Can I have your phone number?”

  9. 9.

    Often you will be asked to provide information on resources or services that you are not familiar with.

    • Describe the process you would use to respond to the query

    • Upon researching the query, you found an overwhelming amount of information, how would you determine what to share with the patient [you were looking up something like “coping with cancer”]?

  10. 10.

    The way this program works is such that when you are agree to take on a patient, you are committing to following through with three contacts with the patient over a 4-week period of time in a way that is convenient for the patient. Describe your ability to respond to the time expectations of this role.

  11. 11.

    What do you see as being the most challenging part of this role/most rewarding?

  12. 12.

    Do you have any questions or is there anything else you would like us to know?

Appendix B

Screening Scoring Tool

Applicant Name___________________ Interviewer Name(s)__________________

Date of Interview__________________

Scale: 1 = inadequate, 3 = adequate, and 5 = advanced skill

Core Competency

1

2

3

4

5

1. Self as Navigator

Self awareness—demonstrates appropriate use of self, limit setting, confidentiality: Questions #6, 7, 8

     

2. Self as Navigator

Responsibility—demonstrates commitment to program, patients, ability to follow through, and willingness to accept direction: Question #1, overall

     

3. Self as Navigator

Personal growth – demonstrates commitment to self directed learning and skill development Question # 2,3

     

4. Self as Navigator

Character—demonstrates integrity, honesty, emotional readiness, respect, and non-judgmental attitude: Questions #4, 6, 7

     

5. Self as Navigator

Empowerment—fosters independence and self-advocacy in the helping relationship: Questions #3, 8

     

6. Communication

Demonstrates calm, caring, and confident presence: Questions #4, 6, 8

     

7. Communication

Demonstrates empathic listening : Questions #4, 6, 8

     

8. Communication

Invites dialogue through use of silence, encourages, non-verbal communication: Questions #4, 6, 8

     

9. Knowledge

Ability to identify needs: Questions #3, 4, 5

     

10. Knowledge

Ability to filter and select relevant information: Questions #3, 4, 5

     

11. Knowledge

Shares information with pace, timing and quantity suited to listener: Questions #4, 5

     

Score (total of each column):

  • Score of 44 (80 %) or higher indicates a strong competency for lay navigation

  • Score of 33–43 (60 %–79 %) indicates a basic competency for lay navigation, monitor their progress during training, additional coaching may be necessary

  • Score of 32 (59%) or lower indicates the individual does not qualify for the lay navigation training.

  • If a volunteer scores less than 3 in any category but scores above 30 overall, they will need additional training and supervision in that area. It is recommended that additional testing of that particular competency area be done before assigning them to a patient.

Appendix C

Final Lay Navigation Competency Interview

Volunteer’s Name___________________ Date___________

Interviewer’s Name

  1. 1.

    (a) You are called by project staff to offer you a patient referral, how do you decide if you can take the referral?

    (b) What are your responsibilities, to both the patient and the program, once you have accepted the referral?

  2. 2.

    It has been one month since training, and you receive your first referral. It is a newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patient. How do you prepare yourself?

  3. 3.

    In your first phone call, the patient tells you that they are new to their community of Port Alberni and they are wondering what supports are available to them at home. What do you do?

  4. 4.

    Role Play 2nd Contact–Phone Contact: A patient talks about being very stressed and anxious. The patient asks about your personal experience with cancer and wants to know how you or those you cared for coped with the stress.

  5. 5.

    Role Play 2nd Contact–In-person: You are meeting at the centre with a patient and her daughter. The visibly anxious daughter is very vocal about looking for help in any form and asks about complementary medicine. The patient isn’t interested in any information about cancer, healing, or treatment.

  6. 6.

    Describe how you would take the mother and daughter (from the above role play) on a tour of the centre.

  7. 7.

    Role Play 3rd Contact–Phone Contact: Prior to the 3rd contact you receive news from program staff that the patient (from Question 5) has been told they are terminal. Role play this closure phone call.

  8. 8.

    You and your partner are out shopping and you see the daughter (from Question 5) in the store. How do you respond? What if the daughter approaches you and starts talking to you about how her mother is doing—how do you respond?

  9. 9.

    Do you have any questions or concerns related to your role as a lay navigator?

Core Competency

1

2

3

4

5

1. Self as Navigator

Self awareness—demonstrates appropriate use of self, limit setting, confidentiality: Questions #7, 8, 4

     

2. Self as Navigator

Responsibility—demonstrates commitment to program, patients, ability to follow through, and willingness to accept direction: Question #1, overall

     

3. Self as Navigator

Personal growth—demonstrates commitment to self-directed learning and skill development: Questions #2, 3

     

4. Self as Navigator

Character—demonstrates integrity, honesty, emotional readiness, respect, and non-judgmental attitude: Questions #5, 7, 8

     

5. Self as Navigator

Empowerment—fosters independence and self-advocacy in the helping relationship: Question #3

     

6. Communication

Demonstrates calm, caring, and confident presence: Questions #4, 5, 7

     

7. Communication

Demonstrates empathic listening : Questions #4, 5, 7

     

8. Communication

Invites dialogue through use of silence, encourages, non-verbal communication: Questions #4, 5, 7

     

9. Knowledge

Ability to identify needs: Questions #3, 5, 6

     

10. Knowledge

Ability to filter and select relevant information: Questions #3, 5, 6

     

11. Knowledge

Shares information with pace, timing and quantity suited to listener: Questions #5, 6

     

Score (total of each column)

  • A score of 44 (80%) or higher indicates a strong competency for lay navigation – volunteer qualified as a Lay Navigator and does not require further training or additional supervision.

  • A score of 33 – 43 (60%-79%) indicates a basic competency for lay navigation – volunteer qualified as a Lay Navigator but requires close supervision and additional coaching may be necessary.

  • A score of 32 (59%) or lower indicates a low competency for lay navigation – volunteer is not qualified as a Lay Navigator.

  • If a volunteer scores less than 3 in any category but scores above 30 overall, they will need additional training and supervision in that area. It is recommended that additional testing of that particular competency area be done before assigning them to a patient.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lorhan, S., Wright, M., Hodgson, S. et al. The development and implementation of a volunteer lay navigation competency framework at an outpatient cancer center. Support Care Cancer 22, 2571–2580 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2238-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2238-8

Keywords

Navigation