Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 June 2014

Abstract

Purpose

This analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes and analgesic use in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours across three comparative studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.

Methods

Pooled data were analysed from three identically designed double-blind phase III studies comparing subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg with intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg monthly in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (n = 2,046), castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 1,901) or other solid tumours (n = 1,597). Pain severity, pain interference, health-related quality of life and analgesic use were quantified.

Results

At baseline, approximately half of patients had no/mild pain (53 % [1,386/2,620] denosumab; 50 % [1,297/2,578] zoledronic acid). Denosumab delayed onset of moderate/severe pain by 1.8 months (median, 6.5 vs 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.76–0.92; p < 0.001; 17 % risk reduction) and clinically meaningful increases in overall pain interference by 2.6 months (median, 10.3 vs 7.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.75–0.92; p < 0.001; 17 % risk reduction) compared with zoledronic acid. Strong opioid use and worsening of health-related quality of life were less common with denosumab.

Conclusions

Across three large studies of patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases, denosumab prevented progression of pain severity and pain interference more effectively than zoledronic acid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman RE (2001) Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 27:165–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243s–6249s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dranitsaris G, Hatzimichael E (2012) Interpreting results from oncology clinical trials: a comparison of denosumab to zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal-related events in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20:1353–1360

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Linden YM, Lok JJ, Steenland E, Martijn H, van Houwelingen H, Marijnen CA, Leer JW (2004) Single fraction radiotherapy is efficacious: a further analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study controlling for the influence of retreatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:528–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK, Edmonson JH, Blum RH, Stewart JA, Pandya KJ (1994) Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 330:592–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G (2008) Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol 19:1985–1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Janjan N (2001) Bone metastases: approaches to management. Semin Oncol 28:28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer (Version 1.2013). National Comprehensive Cancer Network

  9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer (Version 1.2013). National Comprehensive Cancer Network

  10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (Version 2.2013). National Comprehensive Cancer Network

  11. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, Lichinitser M, Fujiwara Y, Yardley DA, Viniegra M, Fan M, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Jun S, Braun A (2010) Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol 28:5132–5139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, Milecki P, Shore N, Rader M, Wang H, Jiang Q, Tadros S, Dansey R, Goessl C (2011) Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 377:813–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, Hirsh V, Hungria V, Prausova J, Scagliotti GV, Sleeboom H, Spencer A, Vadhan-Raj S, von Moos R, Willenbacher W, Woll PJ, Wang J, Jiang Q, Jun S, Dansey R, Yeh H (2011) Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 29:1125–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, Richardson GE, Siena S, Maroto P, Clemens M, Bilynskyy B, Charu V, Beuzeboc P, Rader M, Viniegra M, Saad F, Ke C, Braun A, Jun S (2012) Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer 48:3082–3092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. (2012) Zometa® (zoledronic acid) Injection. Full prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

  16. Cleeland C (2009) The brief pain inventory user guide. The University of Texas MD. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Mendoza TR, Edwards KR, Douglas J, Serlin RC (1996) Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: new information from multidimensional scaling. Pain 67:267–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung KC, Barlev A, Braun A, Qian Y, Zagari M (2009) Development of the Analgesic Quantification Algorithm (AQA): a new scale to assess analgesic use [Poster]. Joint 15th Congress of the European CanCer Organisation and 34th Congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology

  20. Mathias SD, Crosby RD, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Chung K (2011) Estimating minimally important differences for the worst pain rating of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. J Support Oncol 9:72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webster K, Cella D, Yost K (2003) The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:79

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goblirsch MJ, Zwolak PP, Clohisy DR (2006) Biology of bone cancer pain. Clin Cancer Res 12:6231s–6235s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoneda T, Hata K, Nakanishi M, Nagae M, Nagayama T, Wakabayashi H, Nishisho T, Sakurai T, Hiraga T (2011) Involvement of acidic microenvironment in the pathophysiology of cancer-associated bone pain. Bone 48:100–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Honore P, Luger NM, Sabino MA, Schwei MJ, Rogers SD, Mach DB, O'Keefe PF, Ramnaraine ML, Clohisy DR, Mantyh PW (2000) Osteoprotegerin blocks bone cancer-induced skeletal destruction, skeletal pain and pain-related neurochemical reorganization of the spinal cord. Nat Med 6:521–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaasa S, Apolone G, Klepstad P, Loge JH, Hjermstad MJ, Corli O, Strasser F, Heiskanen T, Costantini M, Zagonel V, Groenvold M, Fainsinger R, Jensen MP, Farrar JT, McQuay H, Rothrock NE, Cleary J, Deguines C, Caraceni A (2011) Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification—the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards. BMJ Support Palliat Care 1:281–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. von Moos R, Strasser F, Gillessen S, Zaugg K (2008) Metastatic bone pain: treatment options with an emphasis on bisphosphonates. Support Care Cancer 16:1105–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Milani B, Scholten W (2011) The World Medicines Situation 2011: Access to Controlled Medicines (apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s18062en/s18062en.pdf). World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva

  29. Gater A, Abetz-Webb L, Battersby C, Parasuraman B, McIntosh S, Nathan F, Piault EC (2011) Pain in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:88

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D (2005) General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof 28:192–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. DePuy V, Anstrom KJ, Castel LD, Schulman KA, Weinfurt KP, Saad F (2007) Effects of skeletal morbidities on longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 15:869–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saad F (2005) Clinical benefit of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in advanced prostate cancer. Clin Prostate Cancer 4:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wardley A, Davidson N, Barrett-Lee P, Hong A, Mansi J, Dodwell D, Murphy R, Mason T, Cameron D (2005) Zoledronic acid significantly improves pain scores and quality of life in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomised, crossover study of community vs hospital bisphosphonate administration. Br J Cancer 92:1869–1876

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weinfurt KP, Anstrom KJ, Castel LD, Schulman KA, Saad F (2006) Effect of zoledronic acid on pain associated with bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 17:986–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Amgen Inc. Jonathan Latham (whose work was funded by Amgen Inc.) and Vidya S. Beckman of Amgen Inc. provided medical writing assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosures

The authors disclose the following potential conflicts of interest. Consultant—Amgen (RvM, JJB, AS, JEB, LJF, GM, CSC and DLP); Novartis (RvM, JJB, AS and JEB); Roche (RvM) and Bristol Myers Squibb (JEB). Remuneration—Amgen (RvM, JJB, JEB, LJF and GM); Novartis (RvM and JJB) and Roche (RvM). Funding—Amgen (RvM and JEB); Roche (RvM) and Novartis (JEB). Employment and stock ownership—Amgen (YQ, AB and KC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger von Moos.

Additional information

Portions of this work were presented at the European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) 8th Spring Convention, 26–27 April 2012 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Trial Registration: The three studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00321464, NCT00321620 and NCT00330759.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 52.4 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Moos, R., Body, JJ., Egerdie, B. et al. Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Support Care Cancer 21, 3497–3507 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2

Keywords

Navigation