Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using mixed methods to assess how cancer patients’ needs in relation to their relatives are met in the Danish health care system: a report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aims of this paper were to validate four items assessing how patients’ needs regarding support to and from their relatives are met and to investigate patients’ evaluation of this support.

Method

Items were validated by patient–observer agreement and cognitive interviews. Adequacy of support was assessed in a cross-sectional study of 1,490 Danish cancer patients; 147 of these also answered an open-ended question.

Results

All items performed well in the validation. Only 4 % reported lack of support from their relatives, whereas 9 and 11 % had lacked support from the health care professionals regarding how to tell the relatives about the disease and regarding the relatives in general, respectively. Although the patients’ expectations are not unequivocal, a large proportion (35 %) reported that the health care professionals had shown little interest in how the relatives were doing. This was most pronounced for female patients and patients sampled in urban areas. Compared to older patients, younger patients lacked more support with respect to the relatives in general and regarding how to tell them about the disease. Divorced patients were less satisfied than married patients on all measures.

Conclusion

While most patients felt well-supported by their relatives, the oldest, the divorced, and those without children may be a vulnerable group. Many patients reported that the health care staff showed insufficient interest in the well-being of the relatives. Thus, it may be beneficial for both the patient and the relatives if health care professionals acknowledge and support the relatives in fulfilling their important role as caregiver and companion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Higginson I, Wade A, McCarthy M (1990) Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ 301(6746):277–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keitel M, Zevon M, Rounds J, Petrelli N, Karakousis C (1990) Spouse adjustment to cancer surgery: distress and coping responses. J Surg Oncol 43:148–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison J, Haddad P, Maguire P (1995) The impact of cancer on key relatives: a comparison of relative and patient concerns. Eur J Cancer 31A(11):1736–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Northouse LL, Mood D, Templin T, Mellon S, George T (2000) Couples' patterns of adjustment to colon cancer. Soc Sci Med 50(2):271–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbar O, Zusman A (2007) The correlation between coping strategies, doctor–patient/spouse relationships and psychological distress among women cancer patients and their spouses. Psychooncology 16(11):1010–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eton DT, Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS (2005) Psychological distress in spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 103(11):2412–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, Hussain M et al (2007) Living with prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' psychosocial status and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 25(27):4171–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakaya N, Saito-Nakaya K, Bidstrup PE, Dalton SO, Frederiksen K, Steding-Jessen M et al (2010) Increased risk of severe depression in male partners of women with breast cancer. Cancer 116(23):5527–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer 88(1):226–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grønvold M, Pedersen C, Jensen C, Faber M, Johnsen A. The Cancer Patient's World [In Danish]. 2006. Copenhagen: Danish Cancer Society

  11. Johnsen A, Jensen C, Pedersen C, Groenvold M. The Cancer Patient's World—an investigation of the problems experienced by Danish cancer patients [In Danish]. Copenhagen: Danish Cancer Society; 2006

  12. Andershed B, Ternestedt BM (2001) Development of a theoretical framework describing relatives' involvement in palliative care. J Adv Nurs 34(4):554–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stajduhar KI, Martin W, Cairns M (2010) What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 8(3):277–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Aaronson N, West K, Bottomley A (2002) EORTC quality of life group translation procedure, 2nd edn. Available at http://groups.eortc.be/qol/downloads/200202translation_manual pdf

  15. Groenvold M, Klee M, Sprangers M, Aaronson N (1997) Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient–observer agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 50(4):441–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Willis G (2005) Cognitive interviewing. A tool for improving questionnaire design, 1st edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross L, Lundstrøm L, Petersen M, Johnsen A, Watt T, Groenvold M (2012) Using method triangulation to validate a new instrument (CPWQ-com) assessing cancer patients' satisfaction with communication. Cancer Epidemiol 36(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrom LH, Groenvold M. Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study "The Cancer Patient's World". Support Care Cancer 2011

  19. Cohen J (1960) Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):543–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Willis G, Lessler J (1999) Question Appraisal System QAS-99. Research Triangle Institute, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23(4):334–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J (2009) Qualitative description—the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol 9:52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45(12):1829–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McNamara B, Rosenwax L (2010) Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why? Soc Sci Med 70(7):1035–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Given B, Wyatt G, Given C, Sherwood P, Gift A, DeVoss D et al (2004) Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(6):1105–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall JA, Dornan MC (1990) Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 30(7):811–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Milberg A, Strang P, Carlsson M, Borjesson S (2003) Advanced palliative home care: next-of-kin's perspective. J Palliat Med 6(5):749–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Friethriksdottir N, Saevarsdottir T, Halfdanardottir SI, Jonsdottir A, Magnusdottir H, Olafsdottir KL et al (2011) Family members of cancer patients: needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Acta Oncol 50(2):252–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hwang SS, Chang VT, Alejandro Y, Osenenko P, Davis C, Cogswell J et al (2003) Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliat Support Care 1(4):319–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kwak J, Salmon JR, Acquaviva KD, Brandt K, Egan KA (2007) Benefits of training family caregivers on experiences of closure during end-of-life care. J Pain Symptom Manag 33(4):434–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudson P, Thomas T, Quinn K, Cockayne M, Braithwaite M (2009) Teaching family carers about home-based palliative care: final results from a group education program. J Pain Symptom Manag 38(2):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harding R, Higginson IJ (2003) What is the best way to help caregivers in cancer and palliative care? A systematic literature review of interventions and their effectiveness. Palliat Med 17(1):63–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Caress AL, Chalmers K, Luker K (2009) A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 46(11):1516–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hudson PL, Remedios C, Thomas K (2010) A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for family carers of palliative care patients. BMC Palliat Care 9:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society, Psychosocial Research Foundation (Grants PP06017 and KP08010).

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest declared. The sponsor had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. None of the authors have a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The authors have full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the journal to review the data if required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lone Ross, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Anna Thit Johnsen, Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Line Lund & Mogens Groenvold

  2. Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark

    Mogens Groenvold

Authors
  1. Lone Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morten Aagaard Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Thit Johnsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Line Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mogens Groenvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lone Ross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, L., Petersen, M.A., Johnsen, A.T. et al. Using mixed methods to assess how cancer patients’ needs in relation to their relatives are met in the Danish health care system: a report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”. Support Care Cancer 20, 3211–3220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1466-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1466-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation