Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inequalities in access to cancer treatment: an analysis of cross-regional patient mobility in Greece

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The quest of specialized oncology services represents an inelastic need for cancer patients that often leads to traveling in order to receive adequate care. The present survey assesses patient geographic mobility to access services for the prevention and treatment of neoplasmatic diseases in Greece, a country where the National Health System is characterized by severe misdistribution of oncology-specific resources.

Methods

Based on data from the National Statistical Service for 1999–2005 (last available), we estimated geographic mobility as the difference between oncology patients residing in a specific region and those receiving care in National Health System (NHS) facilities located in the region, for the ten administrative districts of Greece. Especially for Attica, we performed a sub-analysis according to cancer diagnosis.

Results

The most significant mobility is towards Attica, where patients receiving care within the region outnumber the patients actually residing by 48.9% annually, on average. Positive flows are also observed towards Macedonia (8.4%) and Epirus (7.8%). Negative flows are recorded in all remaining regions, the highest noticed in Sterea (−76.2%), Ionian Islands (−63.3%), Aegean Islands (−45.2%), and Thessaly (−37.3%). The largest flow towards Attica is for cases of malignant neoplasms of the skin, uterus, male genital organs, and for Hodgkin’s lymphomas.

Conclusions

Misallocation of oncology-specific resources creates “two-tier” cancer patients based on ability to pay for traveling/accommodation. The severity and the consequences of the disease necessitate a bold approach to resource allocation and the establishment of integrated patient support networks that ensure all cancer patients are offered equal opportunities to effective treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2001) The World Health Report 2001. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ries LAG, Cl K, Hankey BF et al (1999) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1996. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2004): Global Burden of Disease Estimates. Death and DALY estimates for 2002 by WHO member state. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_2000_2002/en/index.html. Accessed on: 26 Feb 2010

  4. Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Meekins A, Topor M, Lamont EB, Brown ML (2008) Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:888–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan H, Roderick P, Martin D, Barnett S (2004) Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England. Int J Health Geogr. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-3-21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yabroff KR, Davis WW, Lamont EB, Fahey A, Topor M, Brown ML, Warren JL (2007) Patient time costs associated with cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:14–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Knopf K, Davis WW, Brown ML (2005) Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care. Med Care 43:640–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessler LG, Ramsey SD (2007) The forest and the trees: the human costs of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lysdahl KB, Borretzen L (2007) Geographical variation in radiological services: a nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 7:21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schweikhart SB, Smithdaniels VL (1993) Location and service mix decisions for a managed health-care network. Socio Econ Plann Sci 27:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jayaraman V, Srivastava R (1995) A service logistics model for simultaneous siting of facilities and multiple levels of equipment. Comput Oper Res 22:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiu LF (2003). Inequalities of access to cancer screening: a literature review. Cancer Screening Series No. 1, December. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Sheffield, UK

  13. Souliotis K, Athanasakis K, Golna C, Papadopoulou C, Kyriopoulos J (2009) Availability and spatial contribution of oncology specific resources in Greece. Doc Greek Med 26:808–817

    Google Scholar 

  14. Souliotis K (2007) Economic inequalities and health policy. Papazisis Publishers, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guidry JJ, Aday LA, Zhang D, Winn RJ (1997) Transportation as a barrier to cancer treatment. Cancer Pract 5:361–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giokas D (2001) Greek Hospitals: how well their resources are used. Omega 29:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Efstathiou N, Ameen J, Coll AM (2007) Healthcare providers’ priorities for cancer care: a Delphi study in Greece. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11:141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)—Working Party on Social Policy, Human Resources for Health Care Systems (2002) Geographical imbalances of HRHC: size, determinants and policy responses. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dussault G, Francescini MC (2006) Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health 4:12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Souliotis K (2001) Approach of the social and regional inequalities in health in Greece. Topos 17:49–74

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tountas Y, Karnaki P, Pavi E, Souliotis K (2005) The “unexpected” growth of the private health sector in Greece. Health Policy 74(2):167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Payne SN, Jarrett N, Jeffs D (2000) The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experience of treatment: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care 9:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitch MI, Gray RE, Mcgowan T, Brunskill I, Steggles S, Sellick S, Bezjak A, McLeese D (2005) Τravelling for radiation cancer treatment: patient satisfaction. Can Oncol Nurs J 15:107–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin-McDonald K, Rogers-Clark C, Hegney D, McCarthy A, Pearce S (2003) Experiences of regional and rural people with cancer being treated with radiotherapy in a metropolitan centre. Int J Nurs Pract 9:176–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hegney D, Pearce S, Rogers-Clark C, Martin-McDonald K, Buikstra E (2005) Close, but still too far. The experience of Australian people with cancer commuting from a regional to a capital city for radiotherapy treatment. Eur J Cancer Care Engl 14:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis C, Girgis A, Williams P, Beeney L (1998) Needs assessment of rural and remote women travelling to the city for breast cancer treatment. Aust N Z J Public Health 22:525–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosato R, Sacerdote C, Pagano E, Di Cuonzo D, Baldi I, Bordon R, Ponti A, Bertetto O, Segnan N, Merletti F, Vineis P, Ciccone G (2009) Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population-based study in Northern Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dejardin O, Remontet L, Bouvier AM, Danzon A, Trétarre B, Delafosse P, Molinié F, Maarouf N, Velten M, Sauleau EA, Bourdon-Raverdy N, Grosclaude P, Boutreux S, De Pouvourville G, Launoy G (2006) Socioeconomic and geographic determinants of survival of patients with digestive cancer in France. Br J Cancer 95:944–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jack RH, Gulliford MC, Ferguson J, Møller H (2003) Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services? Br J Cancer 88:1025–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sariego J (2009) Patterns of breast cancer presentation in the United States: does geography matter? Am Surg 75:545–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sariego J (2008) Regional variation in breast cancer treatment throughout the United States. Am J Surg 196:572–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sowden A, Aletras V, Place M, Rice N, Eastwood A, Grilli R, Ferguson B, Posnett J, Sheldon T (1997) Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access. Qual Health Care 6:109–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bain NSC, Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J (2002) Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care—a qualitative study of rural and urban patients. Farm Pract 19:369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff R, Kerner JF (1999) Equitable access to cancer services: a review to barriers to quality care. Cancer 86:2378–2390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blumenthal S (2002) The effects of socioeconomic status on health in rural and urban America. JAMA 287:109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study was financially supported by Roche (Hellas) S.A.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

We also declare that we have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data, if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostas Athanasakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Athanasakis, K., Souliotis, K., Kyriopoulos, EJ. et al. Inequalities in access to cancer treatment: an analysis of cross-regional patient mobility in Greece. Support Care Cancer 20, 455–460 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1093-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1093-0

Keywords

Navigation