Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bayesian logistic regression in providing categorical streamflow forecasts using precipitation output from climate models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monthly streamflow forecasts have important practical applications in short-term water resources management, e.g., water allocation for different users, flooding prevention, and drought mitigation. This study focuses on developing categorical streamflow forecasts for flooding mitigation purpose, which can be used as a critical component in an early flood warning system. A Bayesian logistic regression approach is proposed to use antecedent streamflow and forecasted precipitation from General Circulation Models (GCMs) and derive the probability of streamflow greater than threshold streamflow. The logistic regression model is Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling that assumes Bernoulli distribution for monthly and Normal distribution for the parameters in the logistic function. To accommodate outliers in the modeling dataset, an additional parameter is added to the Bayesian modeling framework to make it a more robust approach. The Bayesian Logistic Regression is implemented in JAGS and posterior distributions of model parameters are estimated from Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCM) chains. The proposed method is applied to a watershed in Hunan Province located in the middle south of China. Precipitation and streamflow data in the years 1960–2012 were used to estimate the model parameters’ posterior distributions. The model’s performance is tested for monthly streamflow data in the years 2013–2017, using one-month-ahead precipitation forecasts from GCMs. The model is superior to climatology, the reference model, in terms of the accuracy of hit rates. Potential improvement to the model is also discussed. Although the proposed method is demonstrated for the study area, it can be applied to other regions with similar applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability and Code

Data and modeling code are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  • Almanaseer, N., Sankarasubramanian, A. and Bales, J. (2014) Improving Groundwater Predictions Utilizing Seasonal Precipitation Forecasts from General Circulation Models Forced with Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000776

  • Predictions Utilizing Seasonal Precipitation Forecasts from General Circulation Models Forced with Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000776

  • Alemu ET, Palmer RN, Polebitski A, Meaker B (2011) Decision Support System for Optimizing Reservoir Operations Using Ensemble Streamflow Predictions. J Water Res Plan Man 137(1):72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashbolt SC, Perera BJC (2018) Multiobjective Optimization of Seasonal Operating Rules for Water Grids Using Streamflow Forecast Information. J Water Res Plan Man 144(4):05018003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block P (2011) Tailoring seasonal climate forecasts for hydropower operations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 15(4):1355–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block PJ, Souza Filho FA, Sun L, Kwon(2009)H.-H. A Streamflow Forecasting Framework using Multiple Climate and Hydrological Models.JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45:828–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00327.x

  • Bradley AA, Habib M, Schwartz SS (2015) Climate index weighting of ensemble streamflow forecasts using a simple Bayesian approach. Water Resour Res 51(9):7382–7400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Singh VP, Lu W, Zhang J, Zhou J, Guo S (2016) Streamflow forecast uncertainty evolution and its effect on real-time reservoir operation. J Hydrol 540:712–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, Zhou SL, McMahon TA (2003) Use of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water resources management. J Hydrol 270(1–2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong G, Wang L, Condon L, Shearman A, Lall U (2010) A Simple Framework for Incorporating Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts into Existing Water Resource Management Practices1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Association 46(3):574–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpold AA, Sutcliffe K, Clayton J, Goodbody A, Vazquez S (2017) Does Including Soil Moisture Observations Improve Operational Streamflow Forecasts in Snow-Dominated Watersheds? JAWRA J Am Water Resour Association 53(1):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia B, Liu J, Xie Z, Shi C (2018) Interannual Variations and Trends in Remotely Sensed and Modeled Soil Moisture in China. J Hydrometeorol 19(5):831–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke J (2015) Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Academic Press

  • Long Y, Wang H, Jiang C, Ling S (2019) Seasonal Inflow Forecasts Using Gridded Precipitation and Soil Moisture Information: Implications for Reservoir Operation. Water Resour Manag 33(11):3743–3757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Lall U, Robertson AW, Cook E (2017) Optimizing multiple reliable forward contracts for reservoir allocation using multitime scale streamflow forecasts. Water Resour Res 53(3):2035–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossandón Á, Rajagopalan B, Lall U, Nanditha JS, Mishra V(2021) A Bayesian Hierarchical Network Model for Daily Streamflow Ensemble Forecasting.Water Resour. Res.57(9)

  • Oubeidillah A, Tootle G, Piechota T (2019) Incorporating Antecedent Soil Moisture into Streamflow Forecasting. Hydrology 6(2):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokhrel P, Wang QJ, Robertson DE (2013) The value of model averaging and dynamical climate model predictions for improving statistical seasonal streamflow forecasts over Australia. Water Resour Res 49(10):6671–6687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regonda SK, Rajagopalan B, Clark M(2006) A new method to produce categorical streamflow forecasts.Water Resour. Res.42(9)

  • Schepen A, Wang QJ (2015) Model averaging methods to merge operational statistical and dynamic seasonal streamflow forecasts in Australia. Water Resour Res 51(3):1797–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique R, Mejia A (2017) Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region with a Distributed Hydrological Model Forced by GEFS Reforecasts. J Hydrometeorol 18(7):1905–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikder S, Chen X, Hossain F, Roberts JB, Robertson F, Shum CK, Turk FJ (2016) Are General Circulation Models Ready for Operational Streamflow Forecasting for Water Management in the Ganges and Brahmaputra River Basins? J Hydrometeorol 17(1):195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha T, Sankarasubramanian A (2013) Role of climate forecasts and initial conditions in developing streamflow and soil moisture forecasts in a rainfall–runoff regime. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 17(2):721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinschneider S, Brown C(2012) Dynamic reservoir management with real-option risk hedging as a robust adaptation to nonstationary climate.Water Resour. Res.48(5)

  • Tian D, He X, Srivastava P, Kalin L(2021) A hybrid framework for forecasting monthly reservoir inflow based on machine learning techniques with dynamic climate forecasts, satellite-based data, and climate phenomenon information.Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A.1–23

  • Troin M, Arsenault R, Wood AW, Brissette F, Martel JL(2021) Generating Ensemble Streamflow Forecasts: A Review of Methods and Approaches Over the Past 40 Years.Water Resour. Res.57(7)

  • Turner SWD, Bennett JC, Robertson DE, Galelli S (2017) Complex relationship between seasonal streamflow forecast skill and value in reservoir operations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 21(9):4841–4859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Nualláin B, Bouten W (2006) Real-Time Data Assimilation for Operational Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 7(3):548–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Asefa T, Sarkar A(2021)A novel non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for simulating and predicting monthly rainfall.Theor Appl Climatol143,627–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03447-2

  • Wang H, Brill ED, Ranjithan RS, Sankarasubramanian A (2015) A framework for incorporating ecological releases in single reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 78:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu J (2013) Reservoir Operation Incorporating Hedging Rules and Operational Inflow Forecasts. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1427–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whateley S, Palmer RN, Brown C (2015) Seasonal Hydroclimatic Forecasts as Innovations and the Challenges of Adoption by Water Managers. J Water Res Plan Man 141(5):4014071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Cai X, Yang D (2011) Effect of streamflow forecast uncertainty on real-time reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 34(4):495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Yang D, Cai X, Zhao J, Wang H(2012) Identifying effective forecast horizon for real-time reservoir operation under a limited inflow forecast.Water Resour. Res.48(1)

Download references

Funding

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079010 and 51809020), Key Research & Development Plan of Hunan Province, China (2020SK2130), the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China (19B036) and Water Conservancy Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province, China (XSKJ2019081-45).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Yuannan Long; Methodology: Yuannan Long; Formal analysis and investigation: Qian Lv, Xiaofeng Wen; Writing - original draft preparation: Qian Lv, Shixiong Yan; Writing - review and editing: Xiaofeng Wen, Yuannan Long; Funding acquisition: Yuannan Long; Supervision: Yuannan Long.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuannan Long.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, Y., Lv, Q., Wen, X. et al. Bayesian logistic regression in providing categorical streamflow forecasts using precipitation output from climate models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 639–650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02295-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02295-y

Keywords

Navigation