Skip to main content
Log in

A non-traditional approach to the analysis of flood hazard for dams

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional and still prevailing approach to characterization of flood hazards to dams is the inflow design flood (IDF). The IDF, defined either deterministically or probabilistically, is necessary for sizing a dam, its discharge facilities and reservoir storage. However, within the dam safety risk informed decision framework, the IDF does not carry much relevance, no matter how accurately it is characterized. In many cases, the probability of the reservoir inflow tells us little about the probability of dam overtopping. Typically, the reservoir inflow and its associated probability of occurrence is modified by the interplay of a number of factors (reservoir storage, reservoir operating rules and various operational faults and natural disturbances) on its way to becoming the reservoir outflow and corresponding peak level—the two parameters that represent hydrologic hazard acting upon the dam. To properly manage flood risk, it is essential to change approach to flood hazard analysis for dam safety from the currently prevailing focus on reservoir inflows and instead focus on reservoir outflows and corresponding reservoir levels. To demonstrate these points, this paper presents stochastic simulation of floods on a cascade system of three dams and shows progression from exceedance probabilities of reservoir inflow to exceedance probabilities of peak reservoir level depending on initial reservoir level, storage availability, reservoir operating rules and availability of discharge facilities on demand. The results show that the dam overtopping is more likely to be caused by a combination of a smaller flood and a system component failure than by an extreme flood on its own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baecher GB, Hartfor DND, Patev RC, Rytters K, Zielinski PA (2013) Understanding spillway systems reliability. In: Proceedings of ICOLD 81st annual symposium, Seattle, pp 1241–1250

  • CDA (2007) Dam safety guidelines. Canadian Dam Association, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunnane C (1978) Unbiased plotting positions—a review. J Hydrol 37:205–222. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2012) Summary of existing guidelines for hydrologic safety of dams, FEMA report P-919

  • FEMA (2013) Selecting and accommodating inflow design floods for dams, FEMA report P-94

  • Gross E, Lord DW (2014) Why are dams failing before they reach their spillway design capacity? In: Proceedings of the 34th annual USSD conference, San Francisco

  • Hansen EM, Fenn DD, Corrigan P, Vogel JL, Schreiner LC, Stodt RW (1994) Probable maximum precipitation for Pacific Northwest States—Columbia River (including portions of Canada), Snake River and Pacific coastal drainages, hydrometeorological report No. 57, US National Weather Service, Silver Spring

  • Hartford DND, Baecher GB (2004) Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs G (2003) Spillway gates—a survey of operational and reliability issues. Paper presented at 2003 ANCOLD conference, Hobart

  • Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis—an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu YC, Tung YK, Kuo JT (2011) Evaluation of dam overtopping probability induced by flood and wind. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(1):35–49. doi:10.1007/s00477-010-0435-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo JT, Hsu YC, Tung YK, Yeh KC, Wu JD (2008) Dam overtopping risk considering inspection program. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(3):303–313. doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0116-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon HH, Moon YI (2006) Improvement of overtopping risk evaluations using probabilistic concepts for existing dams. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20(4):223–237. doi:10.1007/s00477-005-0017-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin J, Ballard G, Bowles DS (2003) Spillway gate reliability in the context of overall dam failure risk. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual USSD conference, Charleston, ISBN: 9781884575327

  • McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Micovic Z, Quick MC (1999) A rainfall and snowmelt runoff modelling approach to flow estimation at ungauged sites in British Columbia. J Hydrol 226:101–120. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00172-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micovic Z, Quick MC (2009) Investigation of the model complexity required in runoff simulation at different time scales. Hydrol Sci J 54(5):872–885. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micovic Z, Schaefer MG, Barker BL, Taylor GH (2012) Development of hydrologic hazard curves for assessing hydrologic risks at dams on the Campbell River, BC. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Dam Association annual conference, Saskatoon

  • Micovic Z, Schaefer MG, Taylor GH (2015) Uncertainty analysis for probable maximum precipitation estimates. J Hydrol 521:360–373. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, Weinmann PE (2003) Use of Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the expected probability of large to extreme floods. In: Proceedings of 2003 hydrology and water resources symposium, IE Aust., Wollongong, pp 1.105–1.112

  • National Research Council (1985) Safety of dams: flood and earthquake criteria. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet E, Garavaglia F, Gailhard J, Garçon R (2013) The SCHADEX method: a semi-continuous rainfall-runoff simulation for extreme flood estimation. J Hydrol 495:23–37. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quick MC (1995) The UBC Watershed Model. In: Singh VJ (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 233–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer MG, Barker BL (2001) Stochastic event flood model (SEFM). In: Singh VJ, Frevert DK (eds) Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 707–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer MG, Barker BL (2009) Stochastic event flood model—user’s manual, MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc., Olympia

  • Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1992) Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology, vol 18. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USBR (2013) Appurtenant structures for dams (spillways and outlet works), design standards no. 14, phase 4, Chapter 2: hydrologic considerations, U.S. Department of Interior

  • Wyss GD, Jorgenson KH (1998) A user’s guide to LHS: Sandia’s Latin hypercube sampling software, Sandia National Laboratories, Report SAND98-0210

  • Zielinski PA (2011) Inflow design flood and dam safety. In: Schleiss AJ, Boes RM (eds) Dams and reservoirs under changing challenges. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 677–684

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoran Micovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Micovic, Z., Hartford, D.N.D., Schaefer, M.G. et al. A non-traditional approach to the analysis of flood hazard for dams. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 559–581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1052-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1052-2

Keywords

Navigation