Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis (FPPA) method was developed in this study to assess risks associated with environmental pollution-control problems. FPPA integrated environmental transport modeling, fuzzy transformation, probabilistic risk assessment, fuzzy risk quantification into a general risk assessment framework, and was capable of handling uncertainties expressed as fuzzy-parameterized stochastic distributions. The proposed method was applied to two environmental pollution problems, with one being about the point-source pollution in a river system with uncertain water quality parameters and the other being concerned with groundwater contaminant plume from waste landfill site with poorly known contaminant physical properties. The study results indicated that the complex uncertain features had significant impacts on modeling and risk-assessment outputs; the degree of impacts of modeling parameters were highly dependent on the level of imprecision of these parameters. The results also implied that FPPA was capable of addressing vagueness or imprecision associated with probabilistic risk evaluation, and help generate risk outputs that could be elucidated under different possibilistic levels. The proposed method could be used by environmental managers to evaluate trade-offs involving risks and costs, as well as identify management solutions that sufficiently hedge against dual uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baudrit C, Guyonnet D, Dubois D (2007) Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination. J Contam Hydrol 93:72–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair AN, Ayyub BM, Bender WJ (2001) Fuzzy stochastic risk-based decision analysis with the mobile offshore base as a case study. Marine Struct 14:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolster D, Barahona M, Dentz M, Fernandez-Garcia D, Sanchez-Vila X, Trinchero P, Valhondo C, Tartakovsky DM (2009) Probabilistic risk analysis of groundwater remediation strategies. Water Resour Res 45:W06413. doi:10.1029/2008WR007551

  • CEPA (China Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Environmental quality standard for surface water (GB3838-2002). Beijing

  • Chen SQ (2000) Comparing probabilistic and fuzzy set approaches for design in the presence of uncertainty. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

  • Chen Z, Huang GH, Chakma A (2003) Hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing environmental risks at contaminated groundwater systems. J Environ Eng 129:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu HJ, Chang LC (2009) Application of optimal control and fuzzy theory for dynamic groundwater remediation design. Water Resour Manage 23:647–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S, Ginzburg LR (1996) Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 54:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman GS (1995) Monte Carlo: concepts algorithms, and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Massmann JM, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1990) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework. Ground Water 28:738–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH (2009) Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming: application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez S, Fernandez C, Barata C, Tarazona JV (2009) Forecasting risk along a river basin using a probabilistic and deterministic model for environmental risk assessment of effluents through ecotoxicological evaluation and GIS. Sci Total Environ 408:294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Côme B, Perrochet P, Parriaux A (1999) Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessment. J Environ Eng 125:660–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dobois D, Fargier H, Côme B, Chilés JP (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessment. J Environ Eng 129:68–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanss W (2002) The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Z, Rubin Y (2005) On minimum relative entropy concepts and prior compatibility issues in vadose zone inverse and forward modeling. Water Resour Res 41:W12425. doi:10.1029/2005WR004082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu BX, Huang H (2002) Stochastic analysis of reactive solute transport in heterogeneous, fractured porous media: a dual-permeability approach. Transp Porous Med 48:1–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huyakorn PS, Ungs MJ, Mulkey LA, Sudicky EA (1987) A three-dimensional analytical method for predicting leachate migration. Ground Water 25:588–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James BR, Gorelick SM (1994) When enough is enough: the worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design. Water Resour Res 30:3499–3513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral MM (2004) Probabilistic-fuzzy health risk modeling. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 18:324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral MM (2005) 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 19:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral MM (2007) Risk tolerance measure for decision-making in fuzzy analysis: a health risk assessment perspective. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadam IM, Kaluarachehi JJ (2004) Probabilistic risk assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis for the management of contaminated subsurface environments. Dev Water Sci 55:1201–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi S, Pursula M (1998) Treatment of uncertainty in study of transportation: fuzzy set theory and evidence theory. J Transp Eng 124:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Mari M, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2009) Partitioning total variance in risk assessment: application to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ Model Softw 24:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JB, Huang GH, Chakma A, Zeng GM, Liu L (2003) Integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling of petroleum contamination in subsurface. Energ Source 25:547–563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JB, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Maqsood I, Huang YF (2007) An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. J Environ Manage 82:173–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Cheng SY, Guo HC (2004) A simulation-assessment modeling approach for analyzing environmental risks of groundwater contamination at waste landfill sites. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:373–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Li JB, Huang GH (2003) Inexact multiphase modeling system for the management of uncertainty in subsurface contamination. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 7:86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massmann J, Freeze RA, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1991) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 2 Applications to ground-water contamination. Ground Water 29:536–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE (1999a) A model for assessing and managing the risks of environmental lead emissions. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13:231–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE (1999b) Stochastic environmental risk analysis: an integrated methodology for predicting cancer risk from contaminated groundwater. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE, Rubin Y (1999) A methodology to integrate site characterization information into groundwater-driven health risk assessment. Water Resour Res 35:2841–2855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckone TE, Deshpande AW (2005) Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus? Environ Sci Technol 2005(39):42A–47A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos YA, Theodosiou N, Mylopoulos NA (1999) A stochastic optimization approach in the design of an aquifer remediation under hydrogeologic uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 13:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH (2009) An inexact chance-constrained quadratic programming model for stream water quality management. Water Resour Manage 23:661–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Chakma A, Zeng GM, Xi BD (2007) A fuzzy composting process model. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:535–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Li YP (2008) Risk management of BTEX contamination in ground water—an integrated fuzzy approach. Ground Water 46:755–767

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP (2007) Simulation and the Monte Carlo method, 2nd ed. edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Imran SA, Najjaran H (2007) Communicating human health risks associated with disinfection by-products in drinking water supplies: a fuzzy-based approach. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuntjens P (2002) Field-scale cadmium transport in a heterogeneous layered soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 140:401–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling T, Freeze RA, Massmann J, Smith L, James B (1992) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 3. Application to design of a ground-water control system at an open pit mine. Ground Water 30:376–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartakovsky DM (2007) Probabilistic risk analysis in subsurface hydrology. Geophys Res Lett 34:L05404. doi:10.1029/2007GL029245(2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terracini B (1996) Cancer hazard identification and qualitative risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 184:91–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomann RV, Mueller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2009) National primary drinking water regulations. EPA 816-F-09-0004, May 2009

  • Wood KL, Antonsson EK (1990) Modeling imprecision and uncertainty in preliminary engineering design. Mech Mach Theory 25:305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury AD, Ulrych TJ (1993) Minimum relative entropy: Forward probabilistic modeling. Water Resour Res 29:2847–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang AL, Huang GH, Qin XS (2010) An integrated simulation-assessment approach for evaluating health risks of groundwater contamination under multiple uncertainties. Water Resour Manage. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9610-3.

  • Yeh GT (1981) AT123D: Analytical transient one-, two-, and three-dimensional simulation of waste transport in the aquifer system. Oak Ridge National Lab., Report No. ORNL-5602

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Nanyang Technological University (NTU) start-up grant (SUG-M58030007) and the DHI-NTU Water and Environment Research Centre. The author also deeply appreciates the reviewers and the editor for their insightful reviews. The provided comments/suggestions have contributed much to improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. S. Qin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qin, X.S. Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26, 43–58 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0454-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0454-4

Keywords

Navigation