Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of frost nights and day and night temperature during dormancy induction on frost hardiness, tolerance to cold storage and bud burst in seedlings of Norway spruce

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For trees, the ability to obtain and maintain sufficient levels of frost hardiness in late autumn, winter and spring is crucial. We report that temperatures during dormancy induction influence bud set, frost hardiness, tolerance to cold storage, timing of bud burst and spring frost hardiness in seedlings of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Bud set occurred later in 12°C than in 21°C, and later in cool nights (7°C) than in constant temperature. One weekly frost night (−2.5°C) improved frost hardiness. Cool nights reduced frost hardiness early, but improved hardiness later during cold acclimation. Buds and stems were slightly hardier in 21°C than in 12°C, while needles were clearly hardier in 12°C. Cold daytime temperature, cool nights and one weekly frost night improved cold storability (0.7°C). Seedlings receiving high daytime temperatures burst buds later, and were less injured by light frost some days after bud burst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronsson A (1975) Influence of photo- and thermoperiod on the initial stages of frost hardening and dehardening of phytotron-grown seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus silvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Stud For Suec 128:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuker E, Valtonen E, Repo T (1998) Seasonal variation in the frost hardiness of Scots pine and Norway spruce in old provenance experiments in Finland. For Ecol Manag 107:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Dumais D (2005) Root-freezing damage in the containerized nursery: impact on plantation sites—a review. New For 30:167–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Gonzalez A, D’Aoust AL, Hébert C (1996) Frost hardiness, bud phenology and growth of containerized Picea mariana seedlings grown at three nitrogen levels and three temperature regimes. New For 12:243–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Ryyppö A, Lindström A, Stattin E (2001) Cold acclimation and deacclimation of shoots and roots of conifer seedlings. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 57–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Christersson L (1978) The influence of photoperiod and temperature on the development of frost hardiness in seedlings of Pinus silvestris and Picea abies. Physiol Plant 44:288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo SJ (1990) Bud dormancy status, frost hardiness. Shoot moisture content, and readiness of Black spruce container seedlings for frozen storage. J Am Soc Hort Sci 115:302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo SJ (1994) Timing of cold temperature exposure affects root and shoot frost hardiness of Picea mariana container seedlings. Scand J For Res 9:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo SJ, Webb DP, Glerum C (1982) Cold hardiness and bud development under short days in black spruce and white spruce seedlings. In: Scarret JB, Glerum C, Plexman CA (eds) Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, Toronto, Ontario, pp 171–176

  • Colombo SJ, Glerum C, Webb DP (1989) Winter hardening in first-year black spruce (Picea mariana) seedlings. Physiol Plant 76:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo SJ, Menzies MI, O’Reilly C (2001) Influence of nursery cultural practices on cold hardiness of coniferous forest tree seedlings. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 223–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursolle C, Bigras FJ, Margolis HA, Hébert C (1997) Dehardening and second-year growth of white spruce provenances in response to duration of long-night treatments. Can J For Res 27:1168–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalen LS, Johnsen Ø, Ogner G (2001) CO2 enrichment and development of freezing tolerance in Norway spruce. Physiol Plant 113:533–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dormling I (1979) Influences of light intensity and temperature on photoperiodic responses in Norway spruce provenances. In: Proceedings IUFRO joint meeting of working parties on Norway spruce provenances and Norway spruce breeding. Lower Saxony Forest Research Institute, pp 398–408

  • Dormling I (1982) Frost resistance during bud flushing and shoot elongation in Picea abies. Silva Fenn 16:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormling I (1993) Bud dormancy, frost hardiness, and frost drought in seedlings of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. In: Li PH, Christersson L (eds) Advances in plant cold hardiness. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 285–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormling I, Gustafsson Å, von Wettstein D (1968) The experimental control of the life cycle in Picea abies (L.) Karst. I. Some basic experiments on the vegetative cycle. Silvae Genet 17:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez A, Couvillon GA, Hendershott CH (1979) Quantitative chilling enhancement and negation in Peach buds by high temperatures in a daily cycle. J Am Soc Hort Sci 104:536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Fløistad IS, Patil GG (2002) Growth and terminal bud formation in Picea abies seedlings grown with alternating diurnal temperature and different light qualities. Scand J For Res 17:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glerum C (1973) Annual trends in frost hardiness and electrical impedance for seven coniferous species. Can J Plant Sci 53:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glerum C (1976) Frost hardiness of forest trees. In: Cannell MGR, Last FT (eds) Tree physiology and yield improvement. Academic Press, London, pp 403–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer DH, Warrington IJ (1982) Effect of photoperiod, night temperature, and frost incidence on development of frost hardiness in Pinus radiata. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer DH, Stanley CJ, Warrington IJ (1989) Photoperiod control of the initial phase of frost hardiness development in Pinus radiata. Plant Cell Environ 12:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hänninen H (2006) Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiol 26:889–898

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BJ (1993) Photoperiod and night frost influence the frost hardiness of Chamaecyparis nootkatensis clones. Can J For Res 23:1408–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide OM (1974) Growth and dormancy in Norway spruce ecotypes. II. After-effects of photoperiod and temperature on growth and development in subsequent years. Physiol Plant 31:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen Ø (1989a) Freeze-testing young Picea abies plants: a methodological study. Scand J For Res 4:351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen Ø (1989b) Phenotypic changes in progenies of northern clones of Picea abies (L.) Karst. grown in a southern seed orchard. I. Frost hardiness in a phytotron experiment. Scand J For Res 4:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen Ø, Skrøppa T (2000) Provenances and families show different patterns of relationship between bud set and frost hardiness in Picea abies. Can J For Res 30:1858–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen Ø, Dæhlen OG, Østreng G, Skrøppa T (2005) Daylength and temperature during seed production interactively affect adaptive performance of Picea abies progenies. New Phytol 168:589–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson A, Eriksson G, Dormling I, Ifver J (1981) Studies on frost hardiness of Pinus contorta Dougl. seedlings grown in climate chambers. Stud For Suec 157:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Junttila O, Kaurin Å (1990) Environmental control of cold acclimation in Salix pentandra. Scand J For Res 5:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohmann K, Johnsen Ø (2007) Effects of early long-night treatment on diameter and height growth, second flush and frost tolerance in two-year-old Picea abies container seedlings. Scand J For Res 22:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutzsch P (1973) Norway spruce development of buds. IUFRO S2.02.11. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, p 6

  • Kvaalen H, Johnsen Ø (2008) Timing of bud set in Picea abies is regulated by a memory of temperature during zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. New Phytol 177:49–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • L’Hirondelle SJ, Simpson DG, Binder WD (2006) Overwinter storability of conifer planting stock: operational testing of fall frost hardiness. New For 32:307–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavender DP, Wareing PF (1972) Effects of daylength and chilling on the response of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco) seedlings to root damage and storage. New Phytol 71:1055–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Chilling, freezing, and high temperature stresses. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Physiological ecology. Academic Press, London, p 497

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Junttila O, Palva ET (2004) Environmental regulation and physiological basis of freezing tolerance in woody plants. Acta Physiol Plant 26:213–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström A, Stattin E (1994) Root freezing tolerance and vitality of Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings; influence of storage duration, storage temperature, and prestorage root freezing. Can J For Res 24:2477–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoranen J, Lahti M, Rikala R (2008) Frost hardiness of nutrient-loaded two-year-old Picea abies seedlings in autumn and at the end of freezer storage. New For 35:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm DC, Pymar CF (1975) The influence of temperature on the cessation of height growth of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) provenances. Silvae Genet 24:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay HM, Mason WL (1991) Physiological indicators of tolerance to cold storage in Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir seedlings. Can J For Res 21:890–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nienstaedt H (1967) Chilling requirements in seven Picea species. Silvae Genet 16:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørgaard Nielsen CC, Rasmussen HN (2009) Frost hardening and dehardening in Abies procera and other conifers under differing temperature regimes and warm-spell treatments. Forestry 82:43–59. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpn048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly C, McCarthy N, Keane M, Harper CP (2000) Proposed dates for lifting Sitka spruce planting stock for fresh planting or cold storage, based on physiological indicators. New For 19:117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Odlum KD, Colombo SJ (1989) The influence of night temperature under declining photoperiod on bud initiation in black spruce seedlings. Can J For Res 19:274–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens JN, Molder M (1976) Bud development in Sitka spruce. I. Annual growth cycle of vegetative buds and shoots. Can J Bot 54:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owston PW, Kozlowski TT (1981) Growth and cold hardiness of container-grown Douglas-fir, noble fir, and Sitka spruce seedlings in simulated greenhouse regimes. Can J For Res 11:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard DFW (1974) Bud morphogenesis of white spruce Picea glauca seedlings in a uniform environment. Can J Bot 52:1569–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qamaruddin M, Dormling I, Ekberg I, Eriksson G, Tillberg E (1993) Abscisic acid content at defined levels of bud dormancy and frost tolerance in two contrasting populations of Picea abies grown in a phytotron. Physiol Plant 87:203–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen M, Repo T, Lehto T (2006) Effect of thawing time, cooling rate and boron nutrition on freezing point of the primordial shoot in Norway spruce buds. Ann Bot 97:593–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen M, Repo T, Lehto T (2007) Cold acclimation was partially impaired in boron deficient Norway spruce seedlings. Plant Soil 292:271–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA (1984) Effect of freezer storage on bud dormancy release in Douglas-fir seedlings. Can J For Res 14:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA (1986) Relationships among bud dormancy status, cold hardiness, and stress resistance in 2 + 0 Douglas-fir. New For 1:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronco F (1973) Food reserves of Engelmann spruce planting stock. For Sci 19:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostad H (1988) Frost resistance during shoot elongation in Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings in relation to the growth environment of the previous growing period. Silva Fenn 22:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostad H, Granhus A, Fløistad IS, Morgenlie S (2006) Early summer frost hardiness in Picea abies seedlings in response to photoperiod treatment. Can J For Res 36:2966–2973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai A, Eiga S (1985) Physiological and ecological aspects of cold acclimation of boreal conifers. In: Kaurin Å, Junttila O, Nilsen J (eds) Plant production in the north. Norwegian University Press, Oslo, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Silim SN, Lavender DP (1994) Seasonal patterns and environmental regulation of frost hardiness in shoots of seedlings of Thuja plicata, Chamaecyparis nootkatensis, and Picea glauca. Can J Bot 72:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson DG (1990) Frost hardiness, root growth capacity, and field performance relationships in interior spruce, lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir, and western hemlock seedlings. Can J For Res 20:566–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard G (2008) Dormancy and frost hardiness in Norway spruce seedlings. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, 53 p 42 + app

  • Søgaard G, Johnsen Ø, Nilsen J, Junttila O (2008) Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 28:311–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stattin E, Hellqvist C, Lindström A (2000) Storability and root freezing tolerance of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings. Can J For Res 30:964–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmis R, Worral J (1975) Environmental control of cold acclimation in Douglas fir during germination, active growth and rest. Can J For Res 5:464–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Driessche R (1969) Influence of moisture supply, temperature and light on frost-hardiness changes in Douglas-fir seedlings. Can J Bot 47:1765–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Driessche R (1970) Influence of light intensity and photoperiod on frost-hardiness development in Douglas-fir seedlings. Can J Bot 48:2129–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser CJ (1970) Cold resistance and injury in woody plants. Science 169:1269–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall J, Mergen F (1967) Environmental and genetic control of dormancy in Picea abies. Physiol Plant 20:733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder LR, Lanphaer FO (1966) The influence of temperature and light on the cold hardiness of Taxus cuspidata. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 89:706–713

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the staff at the Centre for Plant Research in Controlled Climate at Ås for valuable discussions in the planning and accomplishment of the experiment. We also want to thank H. Odde and G. Østreng for technical assistance. The study was funded by the Research Council of Norway through Project no. 155041/140.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunnhild Søgaard.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Junttila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Søgaard, G., Granhus, A. & Johnsen, Ø. Effect of frost nights and day and night temperature during dormancy induction on frost hardiness, tolerance to cold storage and bud burst in seedlings of Norway spruce. Trees 23, 1295–1307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0371-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0371-7

Keywords

Navigation