Skip to main content
Log in

Crown architecture and dynamics in Abies procera as influenced by cutting for greenery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Greenery production from 13 to 17 years old Abies procera was studied in three localities differing in soil and tree provenance. Two alternative clipping strategies for greenery were applied during 8 years. Subsequently, destructive crown analyses were carried out on the trees sampled from these and traditionally cut plots. Regeneration occurred from stubs or bases of cut primary branches. In cases when stubs were removed, proliferation took place around the scar; these branches compensated in numbers but not in biomass for the absence of stub branches. More severe cutting regimes resulted in an overall biomass reduction, most notably with shorter and lighter whorl branches. Interwhorl branches and branches issued from the base of primary branches were able to extend progressively in response to severe cutting. Base branches were apparently recruited along most of the trunk, the latency of growth points thus being up to at least 10 years. Competition among interwhorl branches, as well as more complicated interactions between whorl branches and secondary branches arising from their base, are indicated by the data. Reiteration directly from the stem could not be provoked and the results suggest that optimum greenery yield depends on careful stub management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bang C (1986) Branching habit of Abies procera. Det Forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark 41: 1–34

  • Bégin C, Filion L (1999) Black spruce (Picea mariana) architecture. Can J Bot 77:664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan JA, Lanner RM (1981) Epicormic branching in Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 11:190–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane LA, Ford ED (1978) Growth of a sitka spruce plantation: analysis and stochastic description of the development of the branching structure. J Appl Ecol 15:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco M (1986) The influence of neighbours on the growth of modular organisms with an example from trees. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B 313:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DA (1962) Apical and radial growth of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) at Chalk River, Ontario, Canada. Can J Bot 40:659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber F (1987) Zur Proventivtriebbildung der Fichte. Allg Forst Zeitsch 42:1285–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical trees and forests. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller B (2002) Nobilis grenery—production by different clipping methods [in Danish]. Abstracts for Skov & Landskabskonferencen 2002. Forest & Landscape Denmark, Hørsholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Little CHA (1970) Apical dominance in long shoots of white pine (Pinus strobus). Can J Bot 48:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel DG, Hinckley M, Schaap W (1991) The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel DG (2002) When branch autonomy fails: Milton’s law of resource availability and allocation. Tree Physiol 22:1119–1124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Kurth W, Lanwert D (1995) Biometrische Grundlagen für ein dynamisches Architekturmodell der Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) Allg Forst Jagdztg 166:177–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was made possible by the support of the “Production Fee Foundation for Christmas Trees and Greenery,” grant no. 2001-0009. We are grateful to a former colleague for originally setting up the experiment, carrying the treatments into effect, and making the greenery yield assessment (Keller 2002), as well as to the administration and staff of the forest districts who provided the study areas and a greater part of the technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanne N. Rasmussen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmussen, H.N., Nielsen, C.N. & Jørgensen, F.V. Crown architecture and dynamics in Abies procera as influenced by cutting for greenery. Trees 19, 619–627 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0425-4

Keywords

Navigation