Abstract
Background
Minimizing the number and scope of ports used to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy attempts to build on the improvements in postoperative pain control, rapid return to activity and work, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic result achieved by the laparoscopic method.
Methods
We studied 141 patients in two sequential studies: the first a prospective randomized trial with 41 patients, and the second an examination of the more minimal procedure in 100 patients. In the randomized trial, patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports: three 5-mm ports or two 10-mm ports and one 5-mm port. The 100 patients underwent the three 5-mm port procedure.
Results
In the randomized trial, differences were not statistically significant. However, on the average, the group with three 5-mm ports required less medication over less time, had less postoperative pain, and took less time to return to activity than the second group with larger ports. A statistically significant difference was found in incisional pain between the smaller group (21 patients) with two 10-mm ports and one 5-mm port and the larger group (100 patients) with three 5-mm ports, whether the measure was overall incisional pain (p=0.014) or a comparison based on specific ports (p=0.001). The percentage of cases requiring port enlargement to remove the gallbladder was not significantly different between the groups. There were no conversions to an open procedure, no fourth trocars added, and no complications. No patient required overnight hospitalization.
Conclusions
Reducing the number and size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy sustains or enhances the improvements initiated by performing laparoscopic rather than open cholecystectomy. In a comparison of microlaparoscopic procedures, patients undergoing the procedure with the shorter incisions experienced significantly less pain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MA, Goresky CA, Meakins JL, and the McGill Gallstone Treatment Group (1992) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. Lancet 340: 1116–1119
Beduschi R, Beduschi MC, Williams AL, Wolf JS Jr (1999) Pneumoperitoneum does not potentiate the nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides in rats. Urology 53: 451–454
Brown E, Hawasli A, Lloyd L (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: morbidity and mortality in a community teaching hospital. J Laparoendosc Surg 3: 13–18
Cala Z (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three trocars. Surg Endosc 8: 476 [abstract]
Catheline JM, Gaillard JL, Rizk N, Barrat C, Champault G (1998) Risk factors and prevention of thromboembolic risk in laparoscopy. Ann Chir 52: 890–895 [abstract]
Chernew M, Fendrick AM, Hirth RA (1997) Managed care and medical technology: implications for cost growth. Health Aff 16: 196–206
Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ (1999) Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 376–381
Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211: 60–62
Herbst CA, Elliott L, Koruda M, Maxwell JG (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of university and community experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 95–99
Hieronymus PJD, van de Berg M, Russler CH, Wereldsma JCJ (1997) Clinical and financial aspects of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic versus open technique. World J Surg 21: 91–97
Kane RL, Lurie N, Borbas C, Morris N, Flood S, McLaughlin B, Nemanich G, Schultz A (1995) The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies. J Am Coll Surg 180: 136–145
McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Ramsay G, Sunderland G, Baxter JN, Anderson JR, Galloway D, O’Dwyer PJ (1994) Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing post-operative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery 115: 533–539
Mealy K, Gallagher H, Barry M, Lennon F, Traynor O, Hyland J (1992) Physiological and metabolic responses to open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 79: 1061–1064
Moncure M, Salem R, Moncure K, Testaiuti M, Marburger R, Ye X, Brathwaite C, Ross SE (1999) Central nervous system metabolic and physiologic effects of laparoscopy. Ann Surg 65: 168–172
Mouret P (1996) How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 25: 744–747
Mühe E (1992) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24: 754–758
Mushinski M (1995) Average charges for cholecystectomy open and laparoscopic procedures, 1994. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co 5: 21–30
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, CarcoForo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84: 695
Ortega AE, Peters JH, Incarbone R, Estrada L, Ehsan A, Kwan Y, Spencer CJ, Moore-Neffries E, Kuchta K, Nicoloff JT (1996) A prospective randomized comparison of the metabolic and stress hormonal responses of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 183: 249–256
Perissat J, Collet D, Belliard R (1990) Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment—cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy, and lithotripsy: our own technique. Surg Endosc 4: 1–5
Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, Rossman L, Brunicardi FC (1999) Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg 23: 128–132
Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 3: 131–133
Rubio PA (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience in 500 consecutive cases. Int Surg 78: 277–279
Sanabria JR, Clavien PA, Cywes R, Strasberg SM (1993) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study. Can J Surg 36: 295–296
Sariego J, Spitzer L, Matsumoto T (1993) The “learning curve” in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg 78: 1–3
Scriven MW, Williamson MER, Foster ME (1994) Audit of patients’ experiences of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic and open operations compared. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39: 232–234
Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL (1992) Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Gynecol Obstet 174: 114–118
Toouli J, Cox MR (1995) Minimal access surgery of the gastrointestinal tract. Aust NZ J Surg 65: 525–532
Vandenbergh HC, Wilson T, Adams SE, Inglis M (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: its impact on national health economics. Med J Australia 162: 587–590
Vittimberga FJ, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP (1998) Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227: 326–334
Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Yasuhito A, Horiuchi A, Doi T (1997) Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy—the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC? Eur J Surg 164: 623–625
Williams LF, Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC (1993) Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 165: 459–465
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leggett, P.L., Churchman-Winn, R. & Miller, G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14, 32–36 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900006
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900006