Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motion analysis

A tool for assessing laparoscopic dexterity in the performance of a laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The ability to make an objective evaluation of a surgeon’s operative ability remains an elusive goal. In this study, we used motion analysis as a measure of dexterity in the performance of a simulated operation.

Methods

Fifteen surgeons performed a total of 45 laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomies on a cadaveric porcine liver model. Subjects were assigned to one of three groups according to their level of experience in human laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Electromagnetic tracking devices were used to analyze the surgeon’s hand movements as they performed the procedure. Movement data (time, distance, number of movements, and speed of movement) were then compared.

Results

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) movement scores across the three groups showed significantly better performance among the experienced laparoscopic surgeons than the novices. Learning curves across repetititions of procedures were plotted. Novices made more improvement than experts.

Conclusions

Motion analysis provides useful data for the assessment of laparoscopic dexterity, and the porcine liver model is a valid simulation of the real procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treasure T (1998) Lessons from the “Bristol Case”: more openness on risks and on individual surgeons’ performance. Br Med J 316: 1685–1686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanna GB, Drew T, Clinch P, Hunter B, Cuschieri A (1998) Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg Endosc 12: 997–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanna GB, Drew T, Cuschieri A (1997) Technology for psychomotor skills testing in endoscopic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 4: 120–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg 174: 410–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Macmillan AI, Cuschieri A (1999) Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 177: 274–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reznick RK, Colliver J, Williams RG, Folse JR (1989) Reliability of different grading systems used in evaluating surgical studients. Am J Surg 157: 346–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenbaum DA (1991) Psychological foundations. Human motor control. Academic Press London, pp 79–118

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Royston C, Lansdown M, Brough W (1994) Teaching laparoscopic surgery: the need for guidelines. Br Med J 308: 1023–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders AF (1991) Simulation as a toll in the measurement of human performance. Ergonomics 34: 995–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith R (1998) All changed, changed utterly: British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. Br Med J 316: 1917–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith S, Wan A, Taffinder N, Read S, Emery R, Darzi A (1999) Early experience and validation work with Procedicus VA: the Prosolvia virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy trainer. Stud Health Technol Inform 62: 337–343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spencer F (1978) Teaching and measuring surgical techniques: the technical evaluation of competence. Bull Am Coll Surg 63: 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taffinder N, McManus I, Russell R, Darzi A (1998) An objective assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: the effect of a training course on performance. Surg Endos 12: 493

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taffinder NJ, McManus IC, Jansen J, Russell RCG, Darzi A (1998) An objective assessment of surgeons’ psychomotor skills: validation of the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. Br J Surg 85 (Suppl): 75

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taffinder N, Smith S, Mair J, Russell R, Darzi A (1999) Can a computer measure surgical precision? reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endos 13 (Suppl 1): 81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Academic Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, 10th Floor, St. Mary’s Hospital, Praed Street, W2 1NY, London, UK

    S. G. T. Smith, J. Torkington, T. J. Brown, N. J. Taffinder & A. Darzi

Authors
  1. S. G. T. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Torkington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. J. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. J. Taffinder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Darzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, S.G.T., Torkington, J., Brown, T.J. et al. Motion analysis. Surg Endosc 16, 640–645 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080081

Key words

Search

Navigation