Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided hepaticoesophagostomy (EUS-HES) for malignant biliary obstruction: the first case series

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

EUS-guided hepaticoesophagostomy (EUS-HES) was reported as an alternative procedure when puncture through the esophagus was inevitable. However, the existing data is very limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-HES in patients with difficult malignant biliary obstruction.

Methods

All cases who underwent EUS-HES at our institute were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 11 patients underwent EUS-HES from January 2011 to December 2017. Five were male, and the mean age was 57.9 ± 6.3 years. The majority of the patients (8 out of 11 patients) had a biliary obstruction caused by cholangiocarcinoma. The technical success was 100%. The mean procedure time was 73.2 ± 37.6 min. The main reason for EUS-HES was the improper alignment of the bile duct due to left lobe hypertrophy. The clinical success was 90.9%. The mean overall survival was 97.8 ± 68.5 days. No major procedure-related complication, particularly pneumomediastinum, occurred.

Conclusions

EUS-HES is a technically feasible and safe procedure to provide biliary drainage, especially in patients with left hepatic lobe hypertrophy. Using a bougie dilator instead of balloon dilation can avoid previously reported complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teoh AYB, Dhir V, Kida M, Yasuda I, Jin ZD, Seo DW et al (2018) Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut 67(7):1209–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z (2016) Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 83(6):1218–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH, Khan S, Kocak M, Alastal Y et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 61(3):684–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):904–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prachayakul V, Aswakul P (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as an alternative to percutaneous drainage and surgical bypass. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwashita T, Doi S, Yasuda I (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a review. Clin J Gastroenterol 7(2):94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lakhtakia S, Chavan R, Ramchandani M, Nabi Z, Reddy DN (2018) Crossing the minefield: EUS-guided transesophageal biliary rendezvous in the presence of esophageal varices and ascites. VideoGIE 3(4):129–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2011) EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 74(6):1276–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Horaguchi J, Koshita S et al (2012) Temporary endosonography-guided biliary drainage for transesophageal placement of a metal stent in recurrent cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Endosc 24(3):191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Will U, Meyer F, Schmitt W, Dollhopf M (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal cholangiodrainage and consecutive endoscopic transhepatic Wallstent insertion into a jejunal stenosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(3):412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharaiha RZ, Kalloo AN, Khashab MA (2012) EUS-guided hepatoesophagostomy for transesophageal biliary drainage (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 76(1):227–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, Hijioka S, Kuwahara T, Tajika M et al (2017) Risks of transesophageal endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage. Int J Gastrointest Interv 6(1):82–84

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khashab MA, Levy MJ, Itoi T, Artifon ELA (2015) EUS-guided biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 82(6):993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khashab MA, Giovannini M (2019) How I do therapeutic EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 90(2):183–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varayu Prachayakul.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Manus Rugivarodom, Dr. Pitulak Aswakul, Dr. Karjpong Techathuvanan, Dr. Arunchai Chang, and Dr.Varayu Prachayakul have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rugivarodom, M., Aswakul, P., Techathuvanan, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided hepaticoesophagostomy (EUS-HES) for malignant biliary obstruction: the first case series. Surg Endosc 36, 1117–1122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08378-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08378-1

Keywords

Navigation