Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: a Korea nationwide study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In 2014, the results derived from the nationwide data of the Korean Anti-reflux Surgery Study (KARS) demonstrated short-term feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery. This study aimed to update the longer-term safety and feasibility of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery up to 1-year follow-up with the KARS nationwide cohort.

Methods

The data of 310 patients with GERD who received anti-reflux surgery up to 2018 were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics, postoperative symptom resolution, and postoperative complications were evaluated at postoperative 3 months and 1 year using the questionnaire designed by KARS. We divided the patients into two groups according to the operation period (up to and after 2014) to identify changes in the trends of the characteristics of surgical patients and operative qualities.

Results

The typical preoperative symptoms were present in 275 patients (91.7%), and atypical symptoms were present in 208 patients (71.0%). Ninety-seven (35.5%) and 124 patients (46.1%) had inadequate PPI responses and hiatal hernia, respectively. At postoperative 1 year, typical and atypical symptoms were either completely or partially controlled in 90.3% and 73.5.0% of patients, respectively. Moderate-to-severe dysphagia, inability to belch, gas bloating, and flatulence at postoperative 1 year were identified in 23.5%, 29.4%, 23.2%, and 22.0% of patients, respectively. The number of surgical patients continuously increased from 2011 to 2018 in Korea. The proportion of patients with hiatal hernia and comorbidities increased (p < 0.01, p = 0.053), and the operation time decreased significantly (p < 0.01) in the late period (2015–2018) as compared with the early period (2011–2014). Symptom control and complication rate were equivalent between the two periods.

Conclusions

Anti-reflux surgery was effective with > 90% of typical symptom resolution and posed a comparable postoperative complication rate with those in Western studies with mid-term to long-term follow-up. This result supports the feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery as a treatment for GERD in the Korean population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jung H-K (2011) Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia: a systematic review. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 17:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim KM, Cho YK, Bae SJ, Kim DS, Shim KN, Kim JH, Jung SW, Kim N (2012) Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Korea and associated health-care utilization: a national population-based study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:741–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y (2013) Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19:5598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaheen N, Ransohoff DF (2002) Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer: scientific review. JAMA 287:1972–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fass R, Shapiro M, Dekel R, Sewell J (2005) Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease–where next? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22:79–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park S, Kwon J-W, Park J-M, Park S, Seo KW (2020) Treatment pattern and economic burden of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease patients in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park S, Park S, Park J-M, Ryu S, Hwang J, Kwon J-W, Seo KW (2020) Anti-reflux surgery versus proton pump inhibitors for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness study in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anvari M, Allen C (2003) Five-year comprehensive outcomes evaluation in 181 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg 196:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C, Layer P, Zornig C (2008) Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 22:21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Richter JE, Kumar A, Lipka S, Miladinovic B, Velanovich V (2018) Efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication vs transoral incisionless fundoplication or proton pump inhibitors in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 154:1298–1308.e1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J-H, Park J-M, Han S-U, Kim J-J, Song KY, Ryu SW, Seo KW, Kim H-I, Kim W, Group KASSK (2016) Antireflux surgery in Korea: a nationwide study from 2011 to 2014. Gut Liver 10:726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rakita S, Villadolid D, Thomas A, Bloomston M, Albrink M, Goldin S, Rosemurgy A (2006) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication offers high patient satisfaction with relief of extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am Surg 72:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slivers S, Vaezi M, Vakil N, Raymond A, Schmalz M, Higginbotham T (2016) Prospective study of upper esophageal sphincter assist device for treating extraesophageal reflux. Otolaryngol Open J 2:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amaris M, Dua KS, Naini SR, Samuel E, Shaker R (2012) Characterization of the upper esophageal sphincter response during cough. Chest 142:1229–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamdy E, El Nakeeb A, Hamed H, El Hemaly M, ElHak NG (2014) Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in non-responders to proton pump inhibitors. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1557–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lundell L, Bell M, Ruth M (2014) Systematic review: laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in partial responders to proton pump inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol 20:804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, Hunter JG, Smith CD (2007) Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 21:1978–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tandon A, Rao R, Hotouras A, Nunes QM, Hartley M, Gunasekera R, Howes N (2017) Safety and effectiveness of anti-reflux surgery in obese patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:515–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdelrahman T, Latif A, Chan DS, Jones H, Farag M, Lewis WG, Havard T, Escofet X (2018) Outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery related to obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 51:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bashir Y, Chonchubhair HN, Duggan SN, Memba R, Ain QU, Murphy A, McMahon J, Ridgway PF, Conlon KC (2019) Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of obesity on recurrence after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Surg-J R Coll Surg E 17:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE (2016) Frailty and postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 16:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cowgill SM, Arnaoutakis D, Villadolid D, Al-Saadi S, Arnaoutakis D, Molloy DL, Thomas A, Rakita S, Rosemurgy A 2nd (2006) Results after laparoscopic fundoplication: does age matter? Am Surg 72:778–783 (Discussion 783-774)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernando HC, Schauer PR, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, Close JM, Luketich JD (2003) Outcomes of minimally invasive anti-reflux operations in the elderly: a comparative review. JSLS 7:311–315

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Irino T, Takeuchi H, Ozawa S, Saikawa Y, Oyama T, Hiraiwa K, Yoshikawa T, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y (2010) Age and body mass index: significant predictive factors for successful laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Surg Today 40:1137–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brehant O, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP, Delattre JF, Meyer C, Baulieux J, Mosnier H (2006) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in the elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Addo A, Sanford Z, Broda A, Zahiri HR, Park A (2020) Age-related outcomes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: is there a “too old” for anti-reflux surgery? Surg Endosc [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 13]

  27. Broeders JA, Roks DJ, Ali UA, Watson DI, Baigrie RJ, Cao Z, Hartmann J, Maddern GJ (2013) Laparoscopic anterior 180-degree versus nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Surg 257:850–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baigrie R, Cullis S, Ndhluni A, Cariem A (2005) Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 92:819–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Pechlivanides G, Tzortzinis A, Mantides A, Xynos E (2004) The effect of total and anterior partial fundoplication on anti-reflux mechanisms of the gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg 188:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, Kim H-I, Han S-U, Kim Y-W, Ryu KW, Park S (2019) comprehensive learning curve of robotic surgery: discovery from a multicenter prospective trial of robotic gastrectomy. Ann Surg [published online ahead of print, 2019 Sep 9]

  32. Desai KM, Frisella MM, Soper NJ (2003) Clinical outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with and without preoperative endoscopic esophagitis. J Gastrointest Surg 7:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwameis K, Oh D, Green KM, Lin B, Zehetner J, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2020) Clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with GERD and PPI refractory heartburn. Dis Esophagus 33(4):doz099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Staehelin A, Zingg U, Devitt PG, Esterman AJ, Smith L, Jamieson GG, Watson DI (2014) Preoperative factors predicting clinical outcome following laparoscopic fundoplication. World J Surg 38:1431–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hahnloser D, Schumacher M, Cavin R, Cosendey B, Petropoulos P (2002) Risk factors for complications of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 16:43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Park J-M, Kim BJ, Kim JG, Chi K-C (2017) Factors predicting outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: experience at a single institution in Korea. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hopkins R, Irvine T, Jamieson G, Devitt P, Watson D (2020) Long-term follow-up of two randomized trials comparing laparoscopic Nissen 360° with anterior 90° partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 107:56–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lord RV, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Elyssnia D, Sheth CT, DeMeester TR (2009) Hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of Nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 13:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Warren HF, Reynolds JL, Lipham JC, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz NA, Taiganides PA, Mickley J, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Louie BE (2016) Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 30:3289–3296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spechler SJ (2017) The durability of antireflux surgery. JAMA 318:913–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Maret-Ouda J, Wahlin K, El-Serag HB, Lagergren J (2017) Association between laparoscopic antireflux surgery and recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux. JAMA 318:939–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maret-Ouda J, Yanes M, Konings P, Brusselaers N, Lagergren J (2016) Mortality from laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in a nationwide cohort of the working-age population. Br J Surg 103:863–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant No. HC17C0050), and by a Grant from Korea University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. Study conception and design: SP and SWH. Data collection: JHL, HMP, JJK, KYS, SWR, KWS, HK, DJK, SP, and SUH. Statistical analysis: YO and MSK. Data interpretation: YO, MSK, and SP. Drafting of the manuscript: MSK and YO. Critical revision: SP and SUH.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sungsoo Park or Sang-Uk Han.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Sungsoo Park was supported by a Grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant No. HC17C0050), and by a Grant from Korea University. Min Seo Kim, Youjin Oh, Jun-Hyun Lee, Joong-Min Park, Jin-Jo Kim, Kyo Young Song, Seung Wan Ryu, Kyung Won Seo, Hyoung-Il Kim, and Sang-Uk Han have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.S., Oh, Y., Lee, JH. et al. Trends in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: a Korea nationwide study. Surg Endosc 35, 4241–4250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07909-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07909-6

Keywords

Navigation