Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A robotic flexible endoscope with shared autonomy: a study of mockup cholecystectomy

  • 2019 EAES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscope is the eye of surgeon in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Prevailing handheld endoscopes are manually steered, which can cause endoscope-instrument fencing. Robotic endoscopes can reduce the fatigue but could not reduce collisions. Handheld endoscopes with a flexible bending tip can reduce the shaft pivoting and collisions. However, its steering is challenging. In this paper, we present a robotic flexible endoscope with auto-tracking function and compare it with the conventional rigid endoscopes.

Methods

A robotic flexible endoscope (RFE) with shared autonomy is developed. The RFE could either track the instruments automatically or be controlled by a foot pedal. A mockup cholecystectomy was designed to evaluate the performance. Five surgeons were invited to perform the mockup cholecystectomy in an abdominal cavity phantom with a manual rigid endoscope (MRE), a robotic rigid endoscope (RRE), and the RFE. Space occupation, time consumption, and questionnaires based on the NASA task load index were adopted to evaluate the performances and compare the three endoscope systems. An ex vivo experiment was conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of using the RFE in a biological tissue environment.

Results

All surgeons completed the mockup cholecystectomy with the RFE independently. Failure occurred in the cases involving the RRE and the MRE. Inside the body cavity, the space occupied when using the RFE is 17.28% and 23.95% (p < 0.05) of that when using the MRE and the RRE, respectively. Outside the body cavity, the space occupied when using the RFE is 14.60% and 15.53% (p < 0.05) of that by using MRE and RRE. Time consumed in the operations with MRE, RRE, and RFE are 28.3 s, 93.2 s and 34.8 s, respectively. Questionnaires reveal that the performance of the RFE is the best among the three endoscope systems.

Conclusions

The RFE provides a wider field of view (FOV) and occupies less space than rigid endoscopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuchs KH (2002) Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 34(02):154–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vitiello V, Lee SL, Cundy TP, Yang GZ (2012) Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 6:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17:574–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A (2013) Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:396–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Y (1996) Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning. CIM-INT MANUF 12(4):372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor RH, Funda J, Eldridge B, Gomory S, Gruben K, LaRose D, Talamini M, Kavoussi L, Anderson J (1995) A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 14(3):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert JM (2009) The EndoAssist™ robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(5):389–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Voros S, Haber GP, Menudet JF, Long JA, Cinquin P (2010) ViKY robotic scope holder: initial clinical experience and preliminary results using instrument tracking. IEEE-ASME T MECH 15(6):879–886

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taniguchi K, Nishikawa A, Sekimoto M, Yasui M, Takiguchi S, Seki Y, Monden M, Miyazaki F (2006) Design of a novel wearable laparoscope manipulator: SMART (Synthetic Muscle Actuator based Robotic Technology). Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirbagheri A, Farahmand F, Meghdari A, Karimian F (2011) Design and development of an effective low-cost robotic cameraman for laparoscopic surgery: RoboLens. Sci Iran 18(1):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristin J, Geiger R, Kraus P, Klenzner T (2015) Assessment of the endoscopic range of motion for head and neck surgery using the SOLOASSIST endoscope holder. Int J Med Robot 11(4):418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wijsman PJ, Broeders IA, Brenkman HJ, Szold A, Forgione A, Schreuder HW, Consten EC, Draaisma WA, Verheijen PM, Ruurda JP, Kaufman Y (2018) First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device. Surg Endosc 32(5):2560–2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W (1998) One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 13(10):2748–2750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arezzo A, Ulmer F, Weiss O, Schurr M, Hamad M, Buess GF (2000) Experimental trial on solo surgery for minimally invasive therapy. Surg Endosc 14(10):955–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holländer SW, Klingen HJ, Fritz M, Djalali P, Birk D (2014) Robotic camera assistance and its benefit in 1033 traditional laparoscopic procedures: prospective clinical trial using a joystick-guided camera holder. Surg Technol Int 25:19–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozaki R, Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, Matsuoka S, Jinushi M, Kono A, Takeda S (2011) Beneficial use of ENDOCAMELEON a novel optical devise for single port laparoscopic surgery for large ovarian cyst. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):S113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ronald C, Rami L, Marc S, Brett C, Marcos M, Todd W (2014) Improving precision and accuracy in laparoscopy using the ENDOEYE FLEX 3D articulating videoscope. https://www.generalsurgerynews.com/Monographs-Whitepapers/Article/04-14/Improving-Precision-and-Accuracy-in-Laparoscopy-Using-the-ENDOEYE-FLEX-3D-Articulating-Videoscope/27350. Accessed 22 Mar 2014

  18. Li Z, Oo MZ, Nalam V, Thang VD, Ren H, Kofidis T, Yu H (2016) Design of a novel flexible endoscope—cardioscope. J Mech Robot 8(5):051014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko SY, Kim J, Lee WJ, Kwon DS (2007) Compact laparoscopic assistant robot using a bending mechanism. ADV Robot 21(5–6):689–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo RC, Wang J, Chang CK, Perng YW (2014, August) Surgeon’s third hand: an assistive robot endoscopic system with intuitive maneuverability for laparoscopic surgery. In: 5th Proceedings of the IEEE RAS EMBS International Conference Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp 138–143

  21. Kazanzides P, Chen Z, Deguet A, Fischer GS, Taylor RH, DiMaio SP (2014, May) An open-source research kit for the da Vinci® Surgical System. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 6434–6439

  22. Li Z, Du R (2013) Design and analysis of a bio-inspired wire-driven multi-section flexible robot. IJARS 10(4):209

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li Z, Ren H, Chiu PWY, Du R, Yu H (2016) A novel constrained wire-driven flexible mechanism and its kinematic analysis. MMT 95:59–75

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma X, Song C, Chiu WYP, Li Z (2019) Autonomous flexible endoscope for minimally invasive surgery with enhanced safety. IEEE Robot Autom Lett (RA-L) 4(3):2607–2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Liu Z, Ma Q, Cheng A, Liu YH, Kim S, Deguet A, Reiter A, Kazanzides P, Taylor RH (2017) Vision-based calibration of dual RCM-based robot arms in human-robot collaborative minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett (RA-L) 3(2):672–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O'Donnell CRD, Thomas Eggemeier F (1986) Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance. Cognitive processes and performance, vol II. Wiley-interscience, New York, p 42-1–42-43

  27. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol 52:139–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D (2010) Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul Healthc 5(5):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) with Project Numbers (14212316, 14207017 and 24204818) and CUHK-SJTU Joint Research Collaboration Fund.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chengzhi Song, Xin Ma and Zheng Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR

    Chengzhi Song, Xianfeng Xia, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Charing Ching Ning Chong & Zheng Li

  2. Chow Yuk Ho Technology Centre for Innovative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR

    Xin Ma, Philip Wai Yan Chiu & Zheng Li

Authors
  1. Chengzhi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianfeng Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip Wai Yan Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charing Ching Ning Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Philip Waiyan Chiu serves as the scientific advisory board member of Aptorum Co Ltd and scientific advisory board member of EndoMASTER Pte Ltd. Chengzhi SONG, Xin MA, Xianfeng XIA, Charing CN CHONG, and Zheng LI have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, C., Ma, X., Xia, X. et al. A robotic flexible endoscope with shared autonomy: a study of mockup cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 34, 2730–2741 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07241-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07241-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation