Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the blood supply using the indocyanine green fluorescence method and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of anastomosis of the gastric tube during esophagectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative anastomotic leakage is a severe complication after gastric tube reconstruction during esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of postoperative endoscopic assessment of anastomosis and its correlation with intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence assessment of the gastric tube.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive patients who underwent gastric tube reconstruction using the ICG fluorescence method during esophagectomy. Forty-six patients underwent the ICG line-marking method (LMM group; ICG before gastric tube creation). The other 26 underwent the conventional procedure and comprised the control group (ICG after gastric tube creation). Postoperative endoscopic assessment (PEA) of anastomosis was performed 7 days after surgery and results were classified as follows: grade 1 (normal or partial white coat), grade 2 (ulcer comprising less than half the circumference), and grade 3 (ulcer comprising more than half the circumference).

Results

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7 of 72 patients (9.7%). The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the LMM group was tended to be lower than those in the control group (6.5% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.244). Of the 40 patients who underwent PEA, 3 (7.5%) had leakage. PEA grading was significantly associated with anastomotic leakage (P < 0.001). Better intraoperative ICG assessment was significantly associated with better endoscopic assessment grade (P = 0.041).

Conclusion

Intraoperative ICG assessment of the gastric tube was associated with PEA grading on anastomosis during esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nozaki I, Kato K, Igaki H, Ito Y, Daiko H, Yano M, Udagawa H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Nakamura K, Kitagawa Y (2015) Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:3519–3526

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, Tomita N, Nakagoe T, Shimada M, Sugihara K, Mori M (2014) A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 260:259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goense L, van Dijk WA, Govaert JA, van Rossum PS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2017) Hospital costs of complications after esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:696–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nederlof N, de Jonge J, de Vringer T, Tran TC, Spaander MC, Tilanus HW, Wijnhoven BP (2017) Does routine endoscopy or contrast swallow study after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction change patient management? J Gastrointest Surg 21:251–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okada T, Kawada K, Nakajima Y, Tokairin Y, Nagai K, Kawano T (2013) Internal pressure of the conduit during endoscopy on the day after esophagectomy. Dig Surg 30:183–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maish M, DeMeesters S, Choustoulakis E, Briel JW, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Lipham JC, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2005) The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19:1093–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Munekage M, Akimori T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2015) Visualization of the stomach’s arterial networks during esophageal surgery using the HyperEye Medical System. Anticancer Res 35:6201–6205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Namikawa T, Sato T, Hanazaki K (2015) Recent advances in near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging surgery using indocyanine green. Surg Today 45:1467–1474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Namikawa T, Uemura S, Kondo N, Yamamoto M, Maeda H, Nishimori H, Sato T, Orihashi K, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2014) Successful preservation of the mesenteric and bowel circulation with treatment for a ruptured superior mesenteric artery aneurysm using the HyperEye Medical System. Am Surg 80:E359–E361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juloori A, Tucker SL, Komaki R, Liao Z, Correa AM, Swisher SG, Hofstetter WL, Lin SH (2014) Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol 9:534–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Imamura Y, Kamiya S, Yamashita K, Kurogochi T, Mine S (2017) Preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin levels predict anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. World J Surg 41:200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goense L, van Rossum PS, Weijs TJ, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD, van Leeuwen MS, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP, Kouwenhoven EA (2016) Aortic calcification increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 102:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauvanet A, Baltar J, Le Mee J, Belghiti J (1998) Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 85:1446–1449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaible A, Sauer P, Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, Radeleff B, Büchler MW, Werner J (2014) Radiologic versus endoscopic evaluation of the conduit after esophageal resection: a prospective, blinded, intraindividually controlled diagnostic study. Surg Endosc 28:2078–2085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujiwara H, Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Tokairin Y, Miyawaki Y, Okada T, Nagai K, Kawano T (2016) Endoscopic assessment 1 day after esophagectomy for predicting cervical esophagogastric anastomosis-relating complications. Surg Endosc 30:1564–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Oguma J, Kazuno A, Yamazaki Y, Ninomiya Y, Ochiai H, Tachimori Y (2016) Blood flow speed of the gastric conduit assessed by indocyanine green fluorescence: new predictive evaluation of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e4386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsutomu Namikawa.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Tsutomu Namikawa, Jun Iwabu, Kazune Fujisawa, Sunao Uemura, Sachi Tsuda, and Kazuhiro Hanazaki have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitagawa, H., Namikawa, T., Iwabu, J. et al. Assessment of the blood supply using the indocyanine green fluorescence method and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of anastomosis of the gastric tube during esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 32, 1749–1754 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5857-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5857-6

Keywords

Navigation