Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Decreased blood perfusion is an important risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL). Fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) provides a real-time assessment of intestinal perfusion. This study evaluated the utility of ICG fluorescence imaging in determining the transection line of the proximal colon during laparoscopic colorectal surgery with double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis.

Methods

This was a prospective single-institution study of 68 patients with left-sided colorectal cancers who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery between August 2013 and December 2014. After distal transection of the bowel, the specimen was extracted extracorporeally and then the mesentery was divided along the planned transection line determined by the surgeons’ judgement under normal q. After ICG was injected intravenously, intestinal perfusion of the proximal colon was assessed in the fluorescent imaging mode. Intestinal perfusion was examined in relation to the patient-, tumor- and surgery-related variables using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

ICG fluorescence imaging showed that intestinal perfusion was present at 3 mm (median) distal to the initially planned transection line. ICG fluorescence imaging resulted in a proximal change of the transection line by more than 5 mm in 18 patients (26.5 %) and, particularly, by more than 50 mm in 3 patients (4.4 %), compared with the initially planned transection line. Univariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus, anticoagulation therapy, preoperative chemotherapy and operative time were significantly associated with poor intestinal perfusion. Multivariate analysis identified anticoagulation therapy (P = 0.021) and preoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.019) as independent risk factors for poor intestinal perfusion. Three patients (4.5 %) with a change of transection line developed AL.

Conclusions

ICG fluorescence imaging is useful for determining the transection line in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Anticoagulation therapy and preoperative chemotherapy are important risk factors for poor intestinal perfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS (2015) Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3608–3617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257:665–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43:76–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH, Young HL (1987) Tissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 30:867–871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kologlu M, Yorganci K, Renda N, Sayek I (2000) Effect of local and remote ischemia-reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Surgery 128:99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakayama S, Hasegawa S, Nagayama S, Kato S, Hida K, Tanaka E, Itami A, Kubo H, Sakai Y (2011) The importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear stapler. Surg Endosc 25:2382–2386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama S, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y (2015) Obtaining secure stapling of a double stapling anastomosis. J Surg Res 193:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasegawa S, Nakayama S, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y (2015) Effect of tri-staple™ technology and slow firing on secure stapling using an endoscopic linear stapler. Dig Surg 32:353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2988–2995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Urbanavicius L, Pattyn P, de Putte DV, Venskutonis D (2011) How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: a review of techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg 3:59–69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A, Kennedy RH, Faiz O (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28:2513–2530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Hoer JJ (2010) Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1025–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3003–3008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, Lagares-Garcia JA (2014) The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28:1695–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA, Lee SW, Senagore AJ, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220:82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Still J, Law E, Dawson J, Bracci S, Island T, Holtz J (1999) Evaluation of the circulation of reconstructive flaps using laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green. Ann Plast Surg 42:266–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Waseda K, Ako J, Hasegawa T, Shimada Y, Ikeno F, Ishikawa T, Demura Y, Hatada K, Yock PG, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ, Takahashi M (2009) Intraoperative fluorescence imaging system for on-site assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:604–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spinoglio G, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Lucido FS, Licciardello A, Maglione V, Grosso F, Quarati R, Ravazzoni F, Lenti LM (2013) Real-time near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): a single-institutional prospective study. Surg Endosc 27:2156–2162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2009) International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sakai Y, Kitano S (2015) Practice guidelines on endoscopic surgery for qualified surgeons by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system. Asian J Endosc Surg 8:103–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hasegawa S, Nagayama S, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Sakai Y (2008) Multimedia article. Autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision in the laparoscopic era. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1279–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Yamaguchi T, Muto T (2008) Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 22:557–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Foster ME, Brennan SS, Morgan A, Leaper DJ (1985) Colonic ischaemia and anastomotic healing. Eur Surg Res 17:133–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sherwinter DA, Gallagher J, Donkar T (2013) Intra-operative transanal near infrared imaging of colorectal anastomotic perfusion: a feasibility study. Colorectal Dis 15:91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Tonder JJ, Boon JM, Becker JH, van Schoor AN (2007) Anatomical considerations on Sudeck’s critical point and its relevance to colorectal surgery. Clin Anat 20:424–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Watanabe J, Ota M, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Suwa H, Momiyama M, Ishibe A, Watanabe K, Masui H, Nagahori K, Ichikawa Y, Endo I (2015) Evaluation of the intestinal blood flow near the rectosigmoid junction using the indocyanine green fluorescence method in a colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M (2015) Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 58:582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miwa M (2010) The principle of ICG fluorescence mode. Open Surg Oncol J 2:26–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank medical staffs and residents of Kyoto University Hospital gastrointestinal surgery for their participation in this study. We could not have completed the study without their diligence and support. This study was supported by a Grant from JFE (The Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy) (to K. Kawada). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Kawada.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Kenji Kawada, Suguru Hasegawa, Toshiaki Wada, Ryo Takahashi, Shigeo Hisamori, Koya Hida and Yoshiharu Sakai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawada, K., Hasegawa, S., Wada, T. et al. Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 31, 1061–1069 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5064-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5064-x

Keywords

Navigation