Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard technique for most indications. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive factors of intra- and postoperative complications in order to inform the orientation of patient to a surgeon with more experience in adrenal surgery.
Methods
From January 1994 to December 2013, 520 consecutive patients benefited from LA at Huriez Hospital, Lille, France. Each complication was graded according to the Dindo–Clavien-grade scale. The predictive factors of complications were determined by logistic regression.
Results
Fifty-two surgeons under the supervision of 5 senior surgeons (individual experience >30 LA) participated. Postoperative complications with a grade of ≥2 occurred in 52 (10 %) patients (29 (5.6 %) medical, 19 (3.6 %) surgical, and 4 (0.8 %) mixed complications) leading to 12 (2.3 %) reoperations. There was no postoperative death. Intraoperative complication happened in 81 (15.6 %) patients responsible for conversion to open adrenalectomy (OA) [odds ratio (OR) 13.9, CI 95 % 4.74–40.77, p < 0.001]. History of upper mesocolic or retroperitoneal surgery was predictive of intraoperative complication (OR 2.02, 1.05–3.91, p = 0.036). Lesion diameter ≥45 mm was predictive of intraoperative complication (OR 1.94, 1.19–3.15, p = 0.008), conversion to OA (OR 7.46, 2.18–25.47, p = 0.001), and adrenal capsular breach (OR 4.416, 1.628–11.983, p = 0.004). Conversion to OA was the main predictive factor of postoperative complications (OR 5.42, 1.83–16.01, p = 0.002). Under adequate supervision, the surgeon’s individual experience and initial adrenal disease were not considered predictive of complications.
Conclusion
Lesion diameter over 45 mm is the determinant parameter for guidance of patients to surgeons with more extensive experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327:1033
Brunt LM et al (1996) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg 183:1–10
Assalia A, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 91:1259–1274
Bickenbach KA, Strong VE (2012) Laparoscopic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy. J Surg Oncol 106:611–618
Gaujoux S et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 98:1392–1399
Shen ZJ et al (2007) Predictive factors for open conversion of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a 13-year review of 456 cases. J Endourol Endourol Soc 21:1333–1337
Gupta PK et al (2011) Outcomes after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 25:784–794
Bergamini C, Martellucci J, Tozzi F, Valeri A (2011) Complications in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the value of experience. Surg Endosc 25:3845–3851
Saunders BD et al (2003) Who performs endocrine operations in the United States? Surgery 134:924–931 (discussion 931)
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Mercan S, Seven R, Ozarmagan S, Tezelman S (1995) Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery 118:1071–1075 (discussion 1075–1076)
Walz MK et al (2006) Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy—results of 560 procedures in 520 patients. Surgery 140:943–948 (discussion 948–950)
Zhang X et al (2007) Technique of anatomical retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy with report of 800 cases. J Urol 177:1254–1257
Seifman BD, Dunn RL, Wolf JS (2003) Transperitoneal laparoscopy into the previously operated abdomen: effect on operative time, length of stay and complications. J Urol 169:36–40
Berber E et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal lateral versus posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery 146:621–625 (discussion 625–626)
Rubinstein M et al (2005) Prospective, randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 174:442–445 (discussion 445)
Nigri G et al (2013) Meta-analysis of trials comparing laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery 153:111–119
Brandao LF et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65:1154–1161
Taskin HE, Berber E (2013) Robotic adrenalectomy. Cancer J Sudbury Mass 19:162–166
Henry JF, Sebag F, Iacobone M, Hubbard J, Maweja S (2002) Lessons learned from 274 laparoscopic adrenalectomies. Ann Chir 127:512–519
Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2009) Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960(144):1060–1067
Cougard P, Peix JL, Peschaud F, Goudet P (2001) Acute pancreatitis after bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Ann Chir 126:336–338
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Mullerat P, Davidson BR (2007) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006004.pub3
Icard P et al (2001) Adrenocortical carcinomas: surgical trends and results of a 253-patient series from the French Association of Endocrine Surgeons study group. World J Surg 25:891–897
Donatini G et al (2014) Long-term survival after adrenalectomy for stage I/II adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): a retrospective comparative cohort study of laparoscopic versus open approach. Ann Surg Oncol 21:284–291
Brix D et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome in 152 patients. Eur Urol 58:609–615
Porpiglia F et al (2010) Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for stage I and II adrenocortical cancer. Eur Urol 57:873–878
Walz MK et al (2005) Endoscopic treatment of large primary adrenal tumours. Br J Surg 92:719–723
Parnaby CN et al (2008) The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater. Surg Endosc 22:617–621
Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, Pharand D, Lacroix A (1997) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann. Surg. 226:238–246 (discussion 246–247)
Lezoche E et al (2008) Perioperative results of 214 laparoscopic adrenalectomies by anterior transperitoneal approach. Surg Endosc 22:522–526
Shen WT, Grogan R, Vriens M, Clark OH, Duh Q-Y (2010) One hundred two patients with pheochromocytoma treated at a single institution since the introduction of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960(145):893–897
Donkervoort SC, Dijksman LM, Versluis PG, Clous EA, Vahl AC (2014) Surgeon’s volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 59:39–45
Yamamoto M et al (2013) Evaluating the learning curve associated with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Am Surg 79:366–371
Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PHG, Ko CY, Yeh MW (2007) Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery 142:887–899 (discussion 887–899)
Turrentine FE et al (2007) Adrenalectomy in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204:1273–1283
Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280:1747–1751
Birkmeyer JD, Skinner JS, Wennberg DE (2002) Will volume-based referral strategies reduce costs or just save lives? Health Aff Proj Hope 21:234–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Thibaut Coste, Robert Caiazzo, Fanelly Torres, Marie Christine Vanthygem, Bruno Carnaille, and François Pattou have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5437-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coste, T., Caiazzo, R., Torres, F. et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by transabdominal lateral approach: 20 years of experience. Surg Endosc 31, 2743–2751 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4830-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4830-0