Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is believed that BE is caused by chronic gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) restores the competency of the cardia and may thereby change the natural course of BE. We studied the impact of LARS on the histological profile of BE and on the control of GERD.

Methods

We identified all patients with BE who underwent LARS from 1994 to 2007 and contacted them to assess post-operative GERD symptoms via questionnaire. Endoscopy findings, histology, 24 hour pH monitoring, and manometry were also collected using our prospectively maintained database. Histological regression was defined as either loss of dysplasia or disappearance of BE.

Results

Two hundred and fifteen patients met the initial inclusion criteria; in 82 of them histology from post-operative endoscopy was available for review. Endoscopy was performed a median of 8 years (range, 1–16 years) after surgery. Regression of BE occurred in 18 (22 %) patients while in 6 (7 %) BE progressed to dysplasia or cancer. Thirty-six (43 %) patients underwent pre- and post-operative manometry. The median lower esophageal sphincter pressure increased from 9 to 17 mmHg in these patients. Thirty-four (41 %) patients underwent pre- and post-operative pH studies. The median DeMeester score decreased from 54 to 9. Sixty-seven (82 %) of 82 patients completed the post-operative questionnaire; 86 % of these patients reported improvement in heartburn and regurgitation.

Conclusions

LARS was associated with both physiologic and symptomatic control of GERD in patients with BE. LARS resulted in regression of BE in 22 % of patients and progression in 7 %. Thus, continued surveillance of Barrett’s is needed after LARS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, Ang Y, Kang JY, Watson P, Trudgill N, Patel P, Kaye PV, Sanders S, O’Donovan M, Bird-Lieberman E, Bhandari P, Jankowski JA, Attwood S, Parsons SL, Loft D, Lagergren J, Moayyedi P, Lyratzopoulos G, de Caestecker J (2014) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s columnar-lined oesophagus. Gut 63(1):7–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Ayazi S, Costales JL, Augustin F, Oezcelik A, Lipham JC, Sohn HJ, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR (2010) Long-term follow-up after anti-reflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 14(10):1483–1491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sikkema M, Looman CW, Steyerberg EW, Kerkhof M, Kastelein F, van Dekken H, van Vuuren AJ, Bode WA, van der Valk H, Ouwendijk RJ, Giard R, Lesterhuis W, Heinhuis R, Klinkenberg EC, Meijer GA, ter Borg F, Arends JW, Kolkman JJ, van Baarlen J, de Vries RA, Mulder AH, van Tilburg AJ, Offerhaus GJ, ten Kate FJ, Kusters JG, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2011) Predictors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 106(7):1231–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, Oleynikov D, Pellegrini CA (2003) Clinical and pathologic response of Barrett’s esophagus to laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 238(4):458–464

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofstetter WL, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Crookes PF, Tsai P, Banki F, Bremner CG (2001) Long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 234(4):532–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang EY, Morris CD, Seltman AK, O’Rourke RW, Chan BK, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2007) The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with Barrett esophagus: a systematic review. Ann Surg 246(1):11–21

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kauer WKH, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Ireland AP, Bremner CG, Hagen JA (1995) Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone: the need for surgical therapy re-emphasized. Ann Surg 222(4):525–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parilla P, Martínez de Haro LF, Ortiz A, Munitiz V, Molina J, Bermejo J, Canteras M (2003) Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 237(3):291–298

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rees JRE, Lao-Sirieix P, Wong A, Fitzgerald RC (2011) Treatment for Barrett’s oesophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi:10.1002/14651858

  10. Wassenaar EB, Oelschlager BK (2010) Effect of medical and surgical treatment of Barrett’s metaplasia. World J Gastroenterol 16(30):3773–3779

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldblum JR, Lauwers GY (2002) Dysplasia arising in Barrett’s esophagus: diagnostic pitfalls and natural history. Semin Diagn Pathol 19(1):12–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ (2011) American gastroenterological association technical review on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 140(3):e18–e52

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma FalkGW, Weston AP, Reker D, Johnston M, Sampliner RE (2006) Dysplasia and cancer in a large multicenter cohort of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(5):566–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, Sorensen HT, Funch-Jensen P (2011) Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. New Engl J Med 365:1375–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Millind R, Attwood SE (2012) Natural history of Barrett’s esophagus. World J Gastroenterol 18(27):3483–3491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curvers WL, Ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, Visser M, Elzer B, Baak LC, Bohmer C, Mallant-Hent RC, van Oijen A, Naber AH, Scholten P, Busch OR, Blaauwgeers HG, Meijer GA, Bergman JJ (2010) Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1523–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ajumobi A, Bahjri K, Jackson C, Griffin R (2010) Surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus: an audit of practice. Dig Dis Sci 55(6):1615–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ana Martin for her work on the prospectively maintained Center for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery database. This study was funded by a SAGES grant.

Disclosures

Dr. Oelschlager has the following relationships, none of which are related to the content of this study: Covidien (Resident education grant, consulting), Torax Medical (Research grant), EndoGastric Solutions (Consultant and research grant), VisionGate (Research grant), Cook BioMedical (Instructor/consultant), Web MD (Advisory Board/consultant). Drs. Morrow, Wassenaar, Hinojosa, Loviscek, Pellegrini and Mr. Bushyhead have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brant Oelschlager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morrow, E., Bushyhead, D., Wassenaar, E. et al. The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Surg Endosc 28, 3279–3284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3601-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3601-z

Keywords

Navigation