Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to determine whether independent virtual endoscopic training accelerates the acquisition of endoscopic skill by novice surgical interns.
Methods
Nine novice surgical interns participated in a prospective study comparing colonoscopy performance in a swine model before and after an independent simulator curriculum. An independent observer evaluated each intern for the ability to reach the cecum within 20 min and technical ability as determined by Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills—Colonoscopy (GAGES-C) score and performance compared. In addition, at the conclusion of training, a post test of two basic simulated colonoscopy modules was completed and metrics evaluated. As a control, three attending physicians who routinely perform colonoscopy also completed colonoscopy in the swine model.
Results
Prior to endoscopic training, one (11 %) intern successfully intubated the cecum in 19.56 min. Following training, six (67 %) interns reached the cecum with mean time of 9.2 min (p < 0.05). Statistically significant improvement was demonstrated in four out of five GAGES-C criteria. All three experts reached the cecum, with a mean time of 4.40 min. Comparison of expert and post-curriculum intern times demonstrated the experts to be significantly faster (p < 0.05). Comparison of interns who were and were not able to reach the cecum following the simulator curriculum demonstrated significantly improved GI Mentor™ performance in the efficiency (79 vs. 67.1 %, p = 0.05) and time to cecum (3.37 vs. 5.59 min, p = 0.01) metrics. No other significant difference was demonstrated in GAGES-C categories or other simulator parameter.
Conclusion
Simulator training on the GI Mentor™ alone significantly improved endoscopic skills in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model. This study also identified parameters on the GI Mentor™ that could indicate ‘clinical readiness’. This study supports the role for endoscopic simulator training in surgical resident education as an adjunct to clinical experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Subhas G, Gupta A, Mittal VK (2010) Necessity for improvement in endoscopy training during surgical residency. Am J Surg 199(3):331–334
Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, Botden SM et al (2008) Expert and construct validity of the SimbionixGI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 22(1):158–162
Fayez R, Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Fried GM (2010) Testing the construct validity of the SimbionixGI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters. Surg Endosc 24(5):1060–1065
Sugden C, Aggarwal R, Banerjee A, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S, Williams CB, Darzi A (2012) The development of a virtual reality training curriculum for colonoscopy. Ann Surg 256(1):188–192
Haycock A, Koch A, Familiari P, van Delft F et al (2006) Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedsidetraining. Gastrointest Endosc 71(2):298–307
Cohen J, Cohen S, Vora K, Xue X et al (2006) Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64(3):361–368
Vassiliou M, Kaneva P, Poulose B, Dunkin B et al (2010) Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841
Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC, Carnahan H (2012) Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008237
Sutton E, Chase SC, Klein R, Zhu Y, Godinez C, Youssef Y, Park A (2013) Development of simulator guidelines for resident assessment in flexible endoscopy. Am Surg 79(1):14–22
Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT (2009) Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ 66(4):201–207
Phitayakorn R, Marks JM, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP (2009) Expert benchmark for the GI Mentor II. Surg Endosc 23(3):611–614
Fried GM (2006) Lessons from the surgical experience with simulators: incorporation into training and utilization in determining competency. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16(3):425–434
Phillips MS, Marks JM (2011) Overview of methods for flexible endoscopic training and description of a simple explant model. Asian J Endosc Surg 4(2):45–52
Ansell J, Mason J, Warren N, Donnelly P, Hawkes N, Dolwani S, Torkington J (2012) Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation. Surg Endosc 26(11):3040–3052
Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, Watson MO, Karamatic R, Basit TA, Wallis GM, Riek S, Burgess-Limerick R, Hewett DG (2012) Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):631–640
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by The Fellowship Council and a the Partners Health System Center of Expertise Medical Education Research Grant.
Disclosures
Drs. Dana A. Telem, David W. Rattner, and Denise Gee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to this research publication to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Telem, D.A., Rattner, D.W. & Gee, D.W. Endoscopic simulator curriculum improves colonoscopy performance in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model. Surg Endosc 28, 1494–1499 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3339-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3339-z