Abstract
Background
Despite the significant improvements in surgical care in developed countries, the adoption of laparoscopy in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) has been sporadic and minimal. Although the most quoted explanation for this has been an apparent lack of resources and training, recent studies have demonstrated that these constraints may not be the only significant barrier. The overall aim of this study was to analyze barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery at a hospital in an LMIC.
Methods
Using an exploratory case study design, this investigation identified barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery in an LMIC. More than 600 hours of participant observation as well as 13 in-depth interviews and document analyses were collected over a 12-week period.
Results
Three overarching barriers emerged from the data: (1) the organizational structure for funding laparoscopic procedures, (2) the hierarchical nature of the local surgical culture, and (3) the expertise and skills associated with a change in practice. The description of the first barrier shows how the ongoing funding structure, rather than upfront costs, of the laparoscopic program limited the number of laparoscopic cases. The description of the second barrier highlights the importance of understanding the local surgical culture in attempts to adopt new technology. The description of the third barrier emphasizes the fact that due to the generalist nature of surgical practice, surgeons were less willing to practice more technically complicated and time-consuming procedures.
Conclusion
This exploratory case study examining the barriers hindering the adoption of laparoscopy in an LMIC represents a novel approach to addressing issues that have plagued surgeons across LMICs for many years. These findings not only further understanding of how to improve the adoption of laparoscopy in LMICs but also challenge the economic-centric notions of the problems that affect the transfer of innovation across social, economic, and geographic boundaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrus CH, Cosgrove JM, Longo WE (1998) Minimally invasive surgery: principles and outcomes. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
Jones DB, Wu JS, Soper NJ (2004) Laparoscopic surgery: principles and procedures, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1997) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12:315–321
Naude AM, Heyns CF, Matin SF (2005) Laparoscopic urology training in South Africa. J Endourol 19:1180–1184
Raiga J et al (1994) Introduction of gynecologic endoscopic surgery in an African setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 46:261–264
Hamamci EO et al (2002) Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:253–258
Nande AG et al (2002) Modified technique of gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing country: a 5-year experience. Dig Surg 19:366–371; discussion 372
Okrainec A, Smith L, Azzie G (2009) Surgical simulation in Africa: the feasibility and impact of a 3-day fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery course. Surg Endosc 23(11):2493
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2013) SAGES global affairs. http://www.sages.org/projects/global_affairs/. Accessed 8 Feb 2013
Baigrie RJ, Stupart D (2010) Introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in developing nations. Br J Surg 97:625–627
Yin RK (2009) Case Study research: design and methods, vol 5. SAGE Inc., Thousand Oaks
Feagin J, Orum A, Sjoberg G (1991) A case for case study. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Savage J (2006) Ethnographic evidence the value of applied ethnography in healthcare. J Res Nurs 11:383–393
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing ethnographic field notes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rice P, Ezzy D (1999) In-depth interviews, in qualitative research methods: a health focus. Chapter 3. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 51–70
Kondracki N, Wellman N (2002) Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 34:224–230
Tobin GA, Begley CM (2004) Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs 48:388–396
Patton MQ (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34(5):1189–1208
Flick U (2009) An introduction to qualitative research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., London
Katz P (1999) The scalpel’s edge. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Goffman E (1961) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis
Fox NJ (1991) The social meaning of surgery. Open University, Buckingham
Prentice R (2007) Drilling surgeons: the social lessons of embodied surgical learning. Sci Technol Hum Values 32:534–553
Bhandari M et al (2003) Challenges to the practice of evidence-based medicine during residents’ surgical training: a qualitative study using grounded theory. Acad Med 78:1183–1190
Kitto S et al (2010) Evidence-based medicine training and implementation in surgery: the role of surgical cultures. J Eval Clin Pract 17:819–826
Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Bruyns J (1996) Laparoscopic surgery and the third world. Surg Endosc 10:957–958
Winter DC (2009) The cost of laparoscopic surgery is the price of progress. Br J Surg 96:327–328
Baird DR et al (1992) An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Am Surg 58:206–210
Kitto SC, Gruen RL, Smith JA (2009) Imagining a continuing interprofessional education program (CIPE) within surgical training. J Continuing Educ Health Prof 29:185–189
Jin CJ et al (2012) Pressures to “measure up” in surgery: managing your image and managing your patient social pressures and clinical judgment. Ann Surg 256(6):989–993
Kellogg KC et al (2006) Resistance to change in surgical residency: an ethnographic study of work hours reform. J Am Coll Surg 202:630–636
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
Asbun HJ et al (1996) Successfully establishing laparoscopic surgery programs in developing countries: clinical results and lessons learned. Surg Endosc 10:1000–1003
Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S-T, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14
Peters JH, Ellison CE, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213:3–12
Wherry DC et al (1994) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 220:626–634
Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W (2008) Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 337:512–514
Teerawattananon Y, Mugford M (2005) Is it worth offering a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in developing countries? A Thailand case study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 3:10
Disclosures
Ian Choy, Simon Kitto, Nii Adu-Aryee, and Allan Okrainec have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choy, I., Kitto, S., Adu-Aryee, N. et al. Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc 27, 4009–4015 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3019-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3019-z