Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the significant improvements in surgical care in developed countries, the adoption of laparoscopy in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) has been sporadic and minimal. Although the most quoted explanation for this has been an apparent lack of resources and training, recent studies have demonstrated that these constraints may not be the only significant barrier. The overall aim of this study was to analyze barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery at a hospital in an LMIC.

Methods

Using an exploratory case study design, this investigation identified barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery in an LMIC. More than 600 hours of participant observation as well as 13 in-depth interviews and document analyses were collected over a 12-week period.

Results

Three overarching barriers emerged from the data: (1) the organizational structure for funding laparoscopic procedures, (2) the hierarchical nature of the local surgical culture, and (3) the expertise and skills associated with a change in practice. The description of the first barrier shows how the ongoing funding structure, rather than upfront costs, of the laparoscopic program limited the number of laparoscopic cases. The description of the second barrier highlights the importance of understanding the local surgical culture in attempts to adopt new technology. The description of the third barrier emphasizes the fact that due to the generalist nature of surgical practice, surgeons were less willing to practice more technically complicated and time-consuming procedures.

Conclusion

This exploratory case study examining the barriers hindering the adoption of laparoscopy in an LMIC represents a novel approach to addressing issues that have plagued surgeons across LMICs for many years. These findings not only further understanding of how to improve the adoption of laparoscopy in LMICs but also challenge the economic-centric notions of the problems that affect the transfer of innovation across social, economic, and geographic boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrus CH, Cosgrove JM, Longo WE (1998) Minimally invasive surgery: principles and outcomes. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones DB, Wu JS, Soper NJ (2004) Laparoscopic surgery: principles and procedures, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1997) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naude AM, Heyns CF, Matin SF (2005) Laparoscopic urology training in South Africa. J Endourol 19:1180–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raiga J et al (1994) Introduction of gynecologic endoscopic surgery in an African setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 46:261–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamamci EO et al (2002) Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nande AG et al (2002) Modified technique of gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing country: a 5-year experience. Dig Surg 19:366–371; discussion 372

    Google Scholar 

  8. Okrainec A, Smith L, Azzie G (2009) Surgical simulation in Africa: the feasibility and impact of a 3-day fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery course. Surg Endosc 23(11):2493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2013) SAGES global affairs. http://www.sages.org/projects/global_affairs/. Accessed 8 Feb 2013

  10. Baigrie RJ, Stupart D (2010) Introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in developing nations. Br J Surg 97:625–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin RK (2009) Case Study research: design and methods, vol 5. SAGE Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feagin J, Orum A, Sjoberg G (1991) A case for case study. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savage J (2006) Ethnographic evidence the value of applied ethnography in healthcare. J Res Nurs 11:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing ethnographic field notes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Rice P, Ezzy D (1999) In-depth interviews, in qualitative research methods: a health focus. Chapter 3. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 51–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kondracki N, Wellman N (2002) Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 34:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tobin GA, Begley CM (2004) Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs 48:388–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patton MQ (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34(5):1189–1208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Flick U (2009) An introduction to qualitative research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katz P (1999) The scalpel’s edge. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goffman E (1961) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fox NJ (1991) The social meaning of surgery. Open University, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prentice R (2007) Drilling surgeons: the social lessons of embodied surgical learning. Sci Technol Hum Values 32:534–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhandari M et al (2003) Challenges to the practice of evidence-based medicine during residents’ surgical training: a qualitative study using grounded theory. Acad Med 78:1183–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitto S et al (2010) Evidence-based medicine training and implementation in surgery: the role of surgical cultures. J Eval Clin Pract 17:819–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Bruyns J (1996) Laparoscopic surgery and the third world. Surg Endosc 10:957–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Winter DC (2009) The cost of laparoscopic surgery is the price of progress. Br J Surg 96:327–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baird DR et al (1992) An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Am Surg 58:206–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kitto SC, Gruen RL, Smith JA (2009) Imagining a continuing interprofessional education program (CIPE) within surgical training. J Continuing Educ Health Prof 29:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jin CJ et al (2012) Pressures to “measure up” in surgery: managing your image and managing your patient social pressures and clinical judgment. Ann Surg 256(6):989–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kellogg KC et al (2006) Resistance to change in surgical residency: an ethnographic study of work hours reform. J Am Coll Surg 202:630–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asbun HJ et al (1996) Successfully establishing laparoscopic surgery programs in developing countries: clinical results and lessons learned. Surg Endosc 10:1000–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S-T, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Peters JH, Ellison CE, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213:3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wherry DC et al (1994) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 220:626–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W (2008) Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 337:512–514

    Google Scholar 

  38. Teerawattananon Y, Mugford M (2005) Is it worth offering a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in developing countries? A Thailand case study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 3:10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Ian Choy, Simon Kitto, Nii Adu-Aryee, and Allan Okrainec have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Choy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choy, I., Kitto, S., Adu-Aryee, N. et al. Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc 27, 4009–4015 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3019-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3019-z

Keywords

Navigation