Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic esophagogastroplasty: a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy in the surgical management of megaesophagus with axis deviation

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The results of cardiomyotomy in patients of achalasic megaesophagus with axis deviation are not satisfactory, and several authors have advocated an esophagectomy in these patients. We describe the technical details and outcomes of a novel technique of laparoscopic esophagogastroplasty for end-stage achalasia.

Methods

Patients with end-stage achalasia, characterized by tortuous megaesophagus were selected. The surgery was performed in supine position using five abdominal ports. The steps included mobilization of the gastroesophageal junction and lower intrathoracic esophagus, straightening and anchoring the pulled intrathoracic esophagus into the abdomen, and a side-side esophagogastroplasty.

Results

Four patients with megaesophagus due to end-stage achalasia underwent this procedure. The average duration of surgery was 177.5 (range, 120–240) min. All patients could be ambulated on the first postoperative day. Oral feeding was initiated by the third postoperative day, and all patients had significant improvements in their dysphagia scores. All patients had excellent cosmetic results and were discharged by the fifth postoperative day. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study done at 6 weeks after surgery did not show any hold up of contrast, and there was decrease in the convolutions and diameter of the esophagus. At a mean follow-up of 10.5 (range, 3–15) months, all patients are euphagic without significant symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic esophagogastroplasty is an effective option for relieving dysphagia in megaesophagus due to achalasia with axis deviation and is a reasonable alternative before subjecting to a major and potentially morbid esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, Takata M, Gadenstätter M, Lin F, Ciovica R (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 249(1):45–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE (1996) Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology 111(3):648–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woltman TA, Pellegrini CA, Oelschlager BK (2005) Achalasia. Surg Clin North Am 85(3):483–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaezi MF, Richter JE (1999) Diagnosis and management of achalasia. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameter Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 94(12):3406–3412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Devaney EJ, Lannettoni MD, Orringer MB, Marshall B (2001) Esophagectomy for achalasia: patient selection and clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 72(3):854–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, Maheshkumaar GS, Vijay Anand N (2008) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for ‘sigmoid’ megaesophagus following failed cardiomyotomy: experience of 11 patients. Dig Dis Sci 53(6):1513–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gockel I, Kneist W, Eckardt VF, Oberholzer K, Junginger T (2004) Subtotal esophageal resection in motility disorders of the esophagus. Dig Dis 22(4):396–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pechlivanides G, Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Tsiaoussis J, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E (2001) Laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy and Dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: possible factors predicting outcome. Arch Surg 136(11):1240–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell TM, Kohn GP, Augenstein V, Fanelli RD, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2012) SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 26(2):296–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu HS, Wang CY, Hsieh CC, Huang MH (2003) Short-segment colon interposition for end-stage achalasia. Ann Thorac Surg 76(5):1706–1710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banki F, Mason RJ, DeMeester SR, Hagen JA, Balaji NS, Crookes PF, Bremner CG, Peters JH, DeMeester TR (2002) Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: a more physiologic alternative. Ann Surg 236(3):324–335 discussion 335-336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Amit Javed and Anil K. Agarwal have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of GI Surgery, GB Pant Hospital & MAM College, Delhi University, New Delhi, 110002, India

    Anil K. Agarwal & Amit Javed

Authors
  1. Anil K. Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amit Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil K. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, A.K., Javed, A. Laparoscopic esophagogastroplasty: a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy in the surgical management of megaesophagus with axis deviation. Surg Endosc 27, 2238–2242 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2751-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2751-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation