Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with fewer postoperative complications than open colectomy. However, it is unclear whether this is true for the most severe complications typically requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU). The authors hypothesized that laparoscopic colectomy patients have fewer of the most severe complications even after adjustment for comorbidity risk.
Methods
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) public use files for 2005–2008, the authors identified all laparoscopic (n = 12,455) and open (n = 33,190) colectomies by current procedural terminology (CPT) code. Using the Clavien classification for postoperative complications, they identified NSQIP data points most consistent with Clavien grade 4 complications requiring ICU care (postoperative septic shock, postoperative dialysis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, prolonged ventilatory requirements, need for reintubation) or grade 5 complication (mortality). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Odds ratios were calculated to compare laparoscopic and open colectomy regarding the probability of having any Clavien class 4 or 5 complication. Logistic regression was performed to account for the effect of preoperative conditions (American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, gender, preoperative functional status, preoperative albumin level, azotemia, thrombocytopenia, emergency case, and age >70 years) on complications.
Results
The univariate odds ratio showed a 2.27- to 5.52-fold greater likelihood that a patient would have a complication requiring ICU admission if open rather than laparoscopic surgery was performed (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression accounting for preoperative comorbidities that might affect outcome showed persistence of an increase in complications, with an odds ratio range of 1.63 to 2.21.
Conclusion
Evaluation of the NSQIP database demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy confers an independent protective effect on the frequency of ICU-level (Clavien grade 4) complications and mortality. The protective effect remained evident after correction for preoperative conditions that might have affected outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johanson OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34
Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662
Heikkinen T, Msika S, Desvignes G, Schwander O, Schiedeck TH, Shekarriz H, Bloechle CH, Baca I, Weiss O, Morino M, Giraudo G, Bonjer HJ, Schouten WR, Lange JF, Van Der Harst E, Plaiser P, Bertleff MJO, Cuesta MA, Van Der Broek W, Meijerink JWHJ, Jakimowicz JJ, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Maring J, Kivit J, Janssen IMC, Spillenaar-Bilgen EJ, Berends F, Lacy AM, Delgado S, Maraculla Akerlund JE, Smedh K, Montgomery A, Skullman S, Nystrom PO, Kald A, Wanstrom A, Dalen J, Svedberg I, Edlund G, Kressner U, Oberg AN, Lundberg O, Lindmark GE, Campbell KL, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Hop WCJ, Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Van Buuren A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a demised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484
Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschielr A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowica JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185
Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1315
Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 196:403–406
Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72
Martense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EGJM, Gouma DG, Hommes DW, Sprangers MA, Bemelman WA (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243:143–149
Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, Van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Gouma DJ (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients. Surg Endosc 14:911–914
Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824
Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: a match-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332
Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031–1033
McNicol L, Story DA, Myles PS, Fink M, Seltno AC, Clavisi O, Poustie SJ (2007) Postoperative complications and mortality in older patients having non-cardiac surgery at three Melbourne teaching hospitals. Med J Aust 186:447–452
Haller G, Myles PS, Wolfe R, Weeks AM, Stoelwinder J, McNeil J (2005) Validity of unplanned admission to an intensive care unit as a measure of patient safety in surgical patients. Anesthesthesiology 103:1121–1129
Dino D, Dematines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Story DA, Leslie K, Myles PS, Poustie SJ, Forbes A, Yap S, Beavis V, Kerridge R (2010) Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Anesthesiology 65:1022–1030
Antolovic D, Koch M, Hinz U, Schottler D, Schmidt T, Heger U, Schmidt J, Buckler MW, Weitz J (2008) Ischemic colitis: analysis of risk factors for postoperative mortality. Langenbeck Arch Surg 393:507–512
Leung JM, Dzanick S (2001) Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1080–1085
Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS (1991) Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 91:152S–157S
Halpin VJ, Soper NJ (2006) Decision to convert to open methods. In: Whelan RL, Fleshman JW Jr, Fowler DL (eds) The SAGES manual: perioperative care in minimally invasive surgery. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, pp 230–296
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Ms. Sarah Whitehouse for her assistance with the editing of this report.
Disclosures
Shawn Webb, Ilan Rubinfeld, Vic Velanovich, H. Mathilda Horst, and Craig Reickert have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used in this report. They have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, S., Rubinfeld, I., Velanovich, V. et al. Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for risk adjustment to compare Clavien 4 and 5 complications in open and laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 26, 732–737 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1944-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1944-2