Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are found in 10% of patients who undergo elective laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease and in 10–20% of patients who present with acute cholecystitis (AC). For the latter, the role of laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common duct (LTCE) as part of a single-stage procedure is still unknown.

Methods

This study, based on a “laparoscopy first” policy, included 201 subjects with cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 104 underwent a scheduled laparoscopic surgery (group A), and 97 where admitted for AC and had urgent laparoscopy (group B). Group B patients were significantly older (68.4 vs. 62.1 years; P = 0.0045), had a higher proportion of women (56% vs. 41%; P = 0.0345), and included more patients in the ASA III–IV class (39% vs. 21%; P = 0.0006). LTCE was performed by using basket-wired catheters. CBD clearance, operating time, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality, postoperative hospital stay, readmission, and residual CBD stones were the main outcome measures.

Results

Clearance of CBD was obtained in 84% of patients of group A and in 80% of patients of group B (P = not significant). Time spent in the operating room was longer for group B (175 vs. 141 min; P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences for postoperative hospital stay (group A 4.9 vs. group B 5.2 days), readmission rate (3.7% vs. 3.7%), and residual CBD stones (2.8% vs. 3.1%). Need to convert and morbidity occurred more frequently in group B (11.7% vs. 4.6% and 28.7% vs. 16.8%, respectively), but differences were not significant. In group A, one patient died from MOFS.

Conclusions

LTCE has proved to be a simple technique with a high yield of CBD clearance in the acute setting. Courses are comparable to those observed for the same procedure in elective surgery despite the fact that patients with AC are more at risk for drawbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson AG, Hosking SW (1987) Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 74:555–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR (1999) Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 117:632–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gracie WA, Ransohoff DF (1982) The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstones is not a myth. N Engl J Med 307:798–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20:S441–S445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiarugi M, Galatioto C, Lippolis PV, Puglisi A, Battini A, Scassa F, Zocco G, Seccia M (2006) Simultaneous laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective study. Chir Ital 58:709–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 19(2):CD003327

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC + LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145(1):28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stromberg C, Nilsson M, Leijonmarck CE (2008) Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 22:1194–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giurgiu DI, Margulies DR, Carroll BJ, Gabbay J, Iida A, Takagi S, Fallas MJ, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Long-term outcome. Arch Surg 134:839–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Memon MA, Hassaballa H, Memon MI et al (2000) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present, the future. Am J Surg 179:309–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vecchio R, MacFadyen BV (2002) Laparoscopic common duct exploration. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 387:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tokumura I, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Perretta S, Lezoche E (2007) Thirteen years’ experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Surg Endosc 21:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M, British Society of Gastroenterology (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips EH, Toouli J, Pitt HA, Soper NJ (2008) Treatment of common bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:624–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Abdel Samie M, Nassar A (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bove A, Bongarzoni G, Palone G, Di Renzo RM, Calisesi EM, Corradetti L, Di Nicola M, Corbellini L (2009) Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis. Surg Endosc 23:1470–1475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavina E, Franceschi M, Sidoti F, Goletti O, Buccianti P, Chiarugi M (1998) Laparo-endoscopic “rendezvous”: a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1430–1435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr, Lechner C, Le Roux S, Lointier P, Chipponi J (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial. World J Surg 21:540–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB, Capurso L (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2006) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005440

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, Lau WY (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18(9):1323–1327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH (2009) Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(89):26–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marín López ER, Cesin-Sánchez R, Roman GR, Gómez C (2003) Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Surg 7(4):492–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Borzellino G, Sauerland S, Minicozzi AM, Verlato G, Di Pietrantonj C, De Manzoni G, Cordiano C (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzegarld E, O’Sullivan G (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Chiarugi, Galatioto, Decanini, Puglisi, Lippolis, Bagnato, Pancicucci, Pelosini, Iacconi and Seccia have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Chiarugi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiarugi, M., Galatioto, C., Decanini, L. et al. Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 26, 124–129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1837-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1837-4

Keywords

Navigation