Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inguinal hernia recurrence after surgical repair is a major concern. The authors report their experience with open and laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed with the charts of 197 patients who had undergone surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias from January 2000 through August 2009, and the data for 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Surgical variables and clinical outcomes were compared using Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

Results

The review showed that 172 patients had undergone either open mesh repair (n = 61) or laparoscopic mesh repair (n = 111) for recurrent inguinal hernias. Postoperative complications were experienced by 8 patients in the open group and 17 patients in laparoscopic group (p = 0.70). Five patients (8.2%) in the open group and four patients (3.6%) in the laparoscopic group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p = 0.28). Four patients in the open group (9.5%) and no patients in the laparoscopic group had recurrence during long-term follow-up evaluation (p = 0.046). In the laparoscopic group, 76 patients (68.5%) underwent total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, and 35 patients (31.5%) had transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Postoperative complications were experienced by 13 patients in the TEP group and 4 patients in the TAPP group (p = 0.44). Two patients (2.6%) in the TEP group and two patients (5.7%) in the TAPP group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p = 0.59).

Conclusions

This retrospective review showed no statistical difference in the re-recurrence rate between the two techniques during short-term follow-up evaluation. However, the laparoscopic technique had a significantly lower re-recurrence rate than the open technique during long-term follow-up evaluation. Both procedures were comparable in terms of intra- and postoperative complications. Among laparoscopic techniques, TEP and TAPP repair are acceptable methods for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. A multicenter prospective randomized control trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE (2009) Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology 136:376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE (2009) Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part II: lower gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology 136:741–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaap HM, van de Pavoordt HD, Bast TJ (1992) The preperitoneal approach in the repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:460–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aufenacker TJ, de Lange DH, Burg MD, Kuiken BW, Hensen EF, Schoots IG, Gouma DJ, Simons MP (2005) Hernia surgery changes in the Amsterdam region 1994–2001: decrease in operations for recurrent hernia. Hernia 9:46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T, Danish Hernia Database C (2001) Quality assessment of 26, 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358:1124–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2008) Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia: a nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg 247:707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haapaniemi S, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, Nilsson E (2001) Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair. Ann Surg 234:122–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper C, Binnebosel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10:309–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus nonmesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data (corrected). Hernia 6:130–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engstrom P, Gunnarsson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberod A (1998) Reoperation as surrogate end point in hernia surgery: a three year follow-up of 1, 565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen PL, Klinge U, Jansen M, Junge K (2009) Risk factors for early recurrence after inguinal hernia repair. BMC Surg 9:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards SK, Earnshaw JJ (2003) Management of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia by surgeons from the South West of England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:402–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kouhia ST, Huttunen R, Silvasti SO, Heiskanen JT, Ahtola H, Uotila-Nieminen M, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T (2009) Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 249:384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards SK, Vipond MN, Earnshaw JJ (2004) Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia. Hernia 8:144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kald A, Smedh K, Anderberg B (1995) Laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results of 200 consecutive herniorraphies. Br J Surg 82:618–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Topal B, Hourlay P (1997) Totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 84:61–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gianetta E, Cuneo S, Vitale B, Camerini G, Marini P, Stella M (2000) Anterior tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernia under local anesthesia: a 7-year experience in a teaching hospital. Ann Surg 231:132–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 317:103–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ, Coala Trial G (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C, Christofides T, Kouraklis G (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1099–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Geis WP, Crafton WB, Novak MJ, Malago M (1993) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: results and technical aspects in 450 consecutive procedures. Surgery 114:765–772 discussion 72–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Roman J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study). Ann Surg 230:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordea A, Champault G (2003) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases. Hernia 7:125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Beets GL, Dirksen CD, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1999) Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 13:323–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Hulkko A (1998) A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:338–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sayad P, Ferzli G (1999) Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar S, Nixon SJ, MacIntyre IM (1999) Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit’s experience. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:301–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feliu X, Jaurrieta E, Vinas X, Macarulla E, Abad JM, Fernandez-Sallent E (2004) Recurrent inguinal hernia: a ten-year review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:362–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Rasmussen I, Spangen L, Wickbom G, Wingren U, Montgomery A (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 21:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Scheuerlein H, Schiller A, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Kockerling F (2003) Totally extraperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1072–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF (1984) The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 64:269–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, I Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program I (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:1122–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Massaron S, Bona S, Fumagalli U, Battafarano F, Elmore U, Rosati R (2007) Analysis of postsurgical pain after inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study of 1, 440 operations. Hernia 11:517–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Feliu-Pala X, Martin-Gomez M, Morales-Conde S, Fernandez-Sallent E (2001) The impact of the surgeon’s experience on the results of laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 15:1467–1470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Motson RW (2002) Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy? BMJ 324:1092–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Neumayer L, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Investigators CSP (2006) Laparoscopic hernia in the light of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 456: more rigorous studies are needed. Surg Endosc 20:1144–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Nilay R. Shah, Dean J. Mikami, Charles Cook, Andrei Manilchuk, Clayton Hodges, Vanchad R. Memark, Eric T. Volckmann, Clinton R. Hall, Steven Steinberg, Bradley Needleman, Jeffrey W. Hazey, W. Scott Melvin, and Vimal K. Narula have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilay R. Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, N.R., Mikami, D.J., Cook, C. et al. A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 25, 2330–2337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1564-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1564-2

Keywords

Navigation