Skip to main content
Log in

Transgastric small bowel resection and anastomosis: a survival study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recently, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery has emerged with new ideas of a transgastric access. The authors have evaluated the possibility of transgastric bowel resection with several modifications. This study aimed to evaluate transgastic small bowel resection using an automated stapling device via an assisting trocar. In a survival experiment, the possible technical problems, medical complications, and safety of the procedure were investigated as well as the postoperative course and follow-up care.

Methods

The study protocol was submitted to the animal research committee and approved. A total of 13 swine with a body weight of 25 kg (range, 20–46 kg) were investigated and entered into the study. General anesthesia was induced by certified personnel using ketamine, halothan, oxygen, and nitrous oxide. One trocar was used for laparoscopic assistance. A needleknife was used to complete a 1.5-cm-long gastrotomy. The gastroscope was advanced into the peritoneal cavity, and a small bowel loop was identified. Through the second channel of the scope, a coag-grasper was used to dissect the mesentery. A linear stapler was inserted through the assisting trocar, and the resection was performed. Afterward, the bowel ends were reopened, and the stapler was reinserted for a side-to-side anastomosis. The specimen was removed via the stomach. Gastric closure was completed using laparoscopic mini-instruments. All problems were prospectively documented. Follow-up evaluation was performed over 2 weeks. The animals were killed and reopened, and evidence of adhesions, infection, and abscess formation was evaluated.

Results

In this study, 13 female animals with a body weight of 25 kg (range, 20–46 kg) underwent surgery. No mortality or postoperative complications occurred. The animals had stable weight development. After a follow-up period of 2 weeks, the animals were killed. The findings included minor adhesions, no abscess, and no inflammation.

Conclusion

Transgastric bowel resection with minor laparoscopic assistance is a safe experimental procedure when performed by surgeons with adequate and extensive training. These experimental procedures should be evaluated carefully and critically in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath S, Niiyama H, Scorpio D, Magee CA, Kalloo A (2005) Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park PO, Bergström M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rattner D, Kalloo AN, ASGE/SAGES working Group (2006) White paper on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S, Fiolka A, Can S, von Hann Weyhenn C, Schneider A, Feussner H (2007) An innovative, safe, and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES. Endoscopy 39:401–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Kuhl HJ, Schulz T, Dignaß A (2010) Experience with a training program for transgastric procedures in NOTES. Surg Endosc 24:601–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Ikeda K, Swain P (2006) Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 63:302–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Onders R, McGee MF, Marks J, Chak A, Schilz R, Rosen MJ, Ignagni A, Faulx A, Elmo MJ, Schomisch S, Ponsky J (2007) Diaphragm pacing with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: potential for difficult-to-wean intensive care unit patients. Surg Endosc 21:475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Swanstrom LL, Whiteford M, Kajanchee Y (2008) Developing essential tools to enable transgastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:600–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Auyang ED, Vaziri K, Volckmann E, Martin JA, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2008) NOTES: cadaveric rendevous hybrid small bowel resection. Surg Endosc 22:2277–2278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Peretta S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 23:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M (1992) Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 163:63–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sylla P, Willingham FF, Sohn DK, Brugge WR, Rattner DW (2008) NOTES rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with transgastric endoscopic assistance: a pilot study in swine. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1717–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Denk PM, Swanstrom LL, Whiteford MH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical platform for natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 68:954–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanstrom LL (2009) A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc 23:2720–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a EURO-NOTES Grant 2008, and the results were presented at the EURO-NOTES 2009 meeting in Barcelona. The authors thank the EURO-NOTES Foundation and Olympus-Europe for their support.

Disclosures

Karl-Hermann Fuchs has been a consultant regarding NOTES techniques for Olympus Europa Holding GmbH, Hamburg.Wolfram Breithaupt, Thomas Schulz, Sandor Ferencz, Gabor Varga, and Georg Weber have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl-Hermann Fuchs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, KH., Breithaupt, W., Schulz, T. et al. Transgastric small bowel resection and anastomosis: a survival study. Surg Endosc 25, 1791–1796 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1464-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1464-5

Keywords

Navigation