Skip to main content
Log in

Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

An increasing number of techniques are emerging in the literature describing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). The advent of a new surgical approach is a reminder of the increase in bile duct injuries in the past when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was first introduced. With this in mind, the authors describe a safe and reproducible approach to SILC.

Methods

Between August 2008 and August 2009, 20 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC using a totally transumbilical fundus-first approach with an intraoperative cholangiogram. Data including pain scores were collected prospectively.

Results

In this initial series, the median operative time was 103 min (range, 55–177 min), including the time for two patients undergoing additional procedures at the time of surgery. Intraoperative cholangiograms were completed for 18 of 19 patients. Additional ports were required in four patients for safe completion of the procedure. The mean pain score 12 h postoperatively was 2.5 on a visual analogue scale with a range of 0–10. There was no morbidity or mortality.

Conclusion

According to the findings, SILC with an intraoperative cholangiogram can be performed safely using a fundus-first approach. However, for SILC to become the operation of choice for the treatment of gallbladder disease, evidence is required to demonstrate its advantage over laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McMahon AJ, Fullarton G, Baxter J, O’Dwyer P (1995) Bile duct injuries and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82:307–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Connor S (2009) Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat. World J Surg 33:1020–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chow A, Purayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print

  6. Hong T, You Y, Lee K (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1393–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrotos A, Molinelli B (2009) Single-incision multiport laparoendoscopic (SIMPLE) surgery: early evaluation of SIMPLE cholecystectomy in a community setting. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print

  8. Podolsky E, Rottman S, Poblete M, King A, Curcillo P (2009) Single-port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A19:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print, June

  11. Psaila J, Agrawal S, Fountain U, Whitfield T, Murgatroyd B, Dunsire F, Gonzalez JG, Patel AG (2008) Day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors influencing same-day discharge. World J Surg 32:76–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuschieri A (1992) The spectrum of laparoscopic surgery. World J Surg 16:1089–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin IG, Dexter PL, Marton J, Gibson J, Asker J, Firullo A, McMahon MJ (1995) Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9:203–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Massarweh NN, Devlin A, Elrod J, Symons R, Flum D (2008) Surgeon knowledge, behavior, and opinions regarding intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 207:821–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cengiz Y, Janes A, Grehn A, Israelsson LA (2005) Randomized clinical trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:810–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun S, Yang K, Gao M, He X, Tian J, Ma B (2009) Three-port versus four-port cholecystectomy: metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Surg 33:1904–1908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print 20, February

  19. Horvath K (1993) Strategies for the prevention of laparoscopic common bile duct injuries. Surg Endosc 7:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

A. G. Patel, B. Murgatroyd, K. Carswell, and A. Belgaumkar have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameet G. Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, A.G., Murgatroyd, B., Carswell, K. et al. Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 25, 954–957 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1240-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1240-6

Keywords

Navigation