Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with major comorbidities often are denied laparoscopic colorectal resections because they are thought to be at too “high risk.” Paradoxically, these patients generally have the most to gain from a minimally invasive surgical approach. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal resection to determine whether it is contraindicated for “high-risk” patients.

Methods

From August 1996 to February 2004, 368 consecutive patients (95 men) undergoing a laparoscopic colorectal procedure by a single surgeon were prospectively studied with regard to pre-, peri-, and postoperative events. High-risk patients (n = 190) were defined as elderly (age, >80 years; n = 28), morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI], >30 kg/m2; n = 55), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 3 or 4 (n = 130), and recipients of preoperative radiotherapy (n = 54). Multiple risk factors were found for 67 patients, 7 of whom had three risk factors. The median age of the patients was 66 years (range, 19–92 years). The diagnoses included rectal cancer (n = 48), diverticulitis (n = 43), colon cancer (n = 34), benign polyp (n = 26), and other (n = 39). The following procedures were performed: colon resection (n = 114; left, 63; right, 41; total abdominal colectomy, 10), rectal resection (low anterior resection or pouch) (n = 49), coloanal anastomosis (n = 23), and other (n = 4). Data regarding intent to treat, operative events, morbidity, mortality, and outcomes were analyzed and form the basis of this report.

Results

No mortalities occurred. The major morbidity rate was 2%. There were no anastomotic leaks. The cases were laparoscopically performed (94%) or laparoscopically assisted, or were converted to open procedure (3%). The median estimated blood loss was 200 ml, and only 5% required perioperative transfusion. The perioperative course involved the following median periods: 2 days until flatus, 3 days until bowel movement, 1 day until clear liquid diet, 3 days until a regular diet, and 5 days until hospital discharge.

Conclusion

In experienced hands, laparoscopic colorectal resection can be performed safely for “high-risk” surgical patients. The better than expected outcomes in this patient population reinforce the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for this patient group and argues against using parameters of increased age, morbid obesity, high ASA class, or preoperative radiation alone as contraindications to even complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29:733–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fielding LP, Phillips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 1:595–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Isbister WH (1997) Colorectal surgery in the elderly: an audit of surgery in octogenarians. Aust N Z J Surg 67:557–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wise WE Jr, Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR (1991) Abdominal colon and rectal operations in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 34:959–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whittle J, Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Herbert R (1992) Results of colectomy in elderly patients with colon cancer, based on Medicare claims data. Am J Surg 163:572–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spivak H, Maele DV, Friedman I, Nussbaum M (1996) Colorectal surgery in octogenarians. J Am Coll Surg 183:46–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bender JS, Maguson TH, Zenilman ME, Smith-Meek MM, Ratner LE, Jones CE, Smith GW (1996) Outcome following colon surgery in the octogenarian. Am Surg 62:276–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenlund KJ, Zheng ZJ, Keenan NL, Giles WH, Casper ML, Mensah GA, Croft JB (2004) Trends in self-reported multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors among adults in the United States, 1991–1999. Arch Intern Med 164:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kushner RF (2002) Medical management of obesity. Semin Gastrointest Dis 13:123–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1997) Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg 163:175–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamagucki T, Martinez S, Chen W, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16:855–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 163:324–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts JV, Bates T (1992) The use of body mass index in studies of abdominal wound infection. J Hosp Infect 20:217–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group (1990) Preoperative short-term radiation therapy in operable rectal carcinoma. Cancer 66:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg P, Nicholls R, Porter N, Love S, Grimsey J (1994) Long-term results of a randomized trial of short-course low-dose adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: reduction in local treatment failure. Eur J Cancer 30A:1597–1599

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marijnen CAM, Kapiteijn E, Van de Velde CJH, Martijn H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Klein Kranenbarg E, Leer JWH (2002) Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 20:817–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Firzgibbons RJ Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peters WR, Bartels TL (1993) Minimally invasive colectomy: are the potential benefits realized? Dis Colon Rectum 36:751–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Bords JM, Taura P, Grande L, Fuster J, Pacheco JL (1995) Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 9:1101–1105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP, Lube MW (1996) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 39:148–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman P, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39(Suppl):S35–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookian C, Tsushima C, Phillips EH (1998) Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 41:832–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Muller JM (1998) Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1131–1136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Muller JM (1998) Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:49–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134:6–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ, Pikarsky AJ, Alabaz O, Nogueras JJ, Nessim A, Weiss EG (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis colon Rectum 43:61–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F; Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schlacta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seshadri PA, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2001) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 15:802–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch H (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dean PA, Beart RW Jr, Nelson H, Elftmann TD, Schlinkert RT (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted segmental colectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 69:834–840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Colorectal Surgery, The Lankenau Hospital and Institute for Medical Research, 100 Lancaster Avenue, Lankenau Medical Office Building West, Suite 330, Wynnewood, PA, 19096, USA

    John H. Marks, Wajdi Hamdan & Gerald Marks

  2. Rouge Valley Health System, Centenary Site, Toronto, ON, Canada, M1E 5E9

    Ulana B. Kawun

Authors
  1. John H. Marks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulana B. Kawun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wajdi Hamdan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerald Marks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Marks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marks, J.H., Kawun, U.B., Hamdan, W. et al. Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 22, 1899–1904 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9828-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9828-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation