Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Reduction in hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative pain and complications are common findings after laparoscopic liver resection, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach may be a suitable alternative to open surgery. Some concerns have been raised regarding cost effectiveness of this procedure and potential implications of its large-scale application. Our aim has been to determine cost effectiveness of laparoscopic liver surgery by a case-matched, case–control, intention-to-treat analysis of its costs and short-term clinical outcomes compared with open surgery.

Methods

Laparoscopic liver segmentectomies and bisegmentectomies performed at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School between 2005 and 2007 were considered. Resections involving more than two Couinaud segments, or involving any synchronous procedure, were excluded. An operation-magnitude-matched control group was identified amongst open liver resections performed between 2004 and 2007. Hospital costs were obtained from the Scottish Health Service Costs Book (ISD Scotland) and average national costs were calculated. Cost of theatre time, disposable surgical devices, hospital stay, and high-dependency unit (HDU) and intensive care unit (ICU) usage were the main endpoints for comparison. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test, χ 2 and Fisher exact test as most appropriate.

Results

Twenty-five laparoscopic liver resections were considered, including atypical resection, segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy, and they were compared to 25 matching open resections. The two groups were homogeneous by age, sex, coexistent morbidity, magnitude of resection, prevalence of liver cirrhosis and indications. Operative time (p < 0.03), blood loss (p < 0.0001), Pringle manoeuvre (p < 0.03), hospital stay (p < 0.003) and postoperative complications (p < 0.002) were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group. Overall hospital cost was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group by an average of £2,571 (p < 0.04).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic liver segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy are feasible, safe and cost effective compared to similar open resections. Large-scale application of laparoscopic liver surgery could translate into significant savings to hospitals and health care programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Descottes B, Lachachi F, Sodji M, Valleix D, Durand-Fontanier S, Pech de Laclause B, Grousseau D (2000) Early experience with laparoscopic approach for solid liver tumors: initial 16 cases. Ann Surg 232:641–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cherqui D (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 90:644–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stephan F, Bensaid S, Rotman N, Fagniez PL (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buell JF, Koffron AJ, Thomas MJ, Rudich S, Abecassis M, Woodle ES (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 200:472–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Troisi R, Montalti R, Smeets P, Van Huysse J, Van Vlierberghe H, Colle I, De Gendt S, de Hemptinne B (2008) The value of laparoscopic liver surgery for solid benign hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc 22:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Lovegrove R, Jiao L, Antoniou A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms—a meta-analysis. Surgery 141:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buell JF, Thomas MJ, Doty TC, Gersin KS, Merchen TD, Gupta M, Rudich SM, Woodle ES (2004) An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery. Surgery 136:804–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morino M, Morra I, Rosso E, Miglietta C, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 17:1914–1918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rau HG, Buttler E, Meyer G, Schardey HM, Schildberg FW (1998) Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy—a prospective analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 45:2333–2338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mala T, Edwin B, Gladhaug I, Fosse E, Soreide O, Bergan A, Mathisen O (2002) A comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases. Surg Endosc 16:1059–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Farges O, Jagot P, Kirstetter P, Marty J, Belghiti J (2002) Prospective assessment of the safety and benefit of laparoscopic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez PL (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138:763–769; discussion 769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Otsuka Y, Tsuchiya M, Tamura A, Katagiri T, Maeda T, Shiba T (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL (2003) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case–control study. J Am Coll Surg 196:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J, Goergen M, Ceuterick M, Morino M, Etienne J, Marescaux J, Mutter D, van Krunckelsven L, Descottes B, Valleix D, Lachachi F, Bertrand C, Mansvelt B, Hubens G, Saey JP, Schockmel R (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236:90–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392 discussion 392–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagher I, Lainas P, Carloni A, Caillard C, Champault A, Smadja C, Franco D (2008) Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 22:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A, Richa H, Tranchart H, Franco D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients. Surg Endosc 21:619–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 21:2004–2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Topal T, Aerts R, Penninckx F (2007) Laparoscopic intrahepatic Glissonian approach for right hepatectomy is safe, simple, and reproducible. Surg Endosc 21:2111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY, Peng SY (2008) Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc Epub ahead of print.

  22. Chen HY, Juan CC, Ker CG (2008) Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15:800–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ardito F, Tayar C, Laurent A, Karoui M, Loriau J, Cherqui D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease. Arch Surg 142:1188–1193; discussion 1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang S, Laurent A, Tayar C, Karoui M, Cherqui D (2007) Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy. Br J Surg 94:58–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuschieri A, Ferreira E, Goh P, Idezuki Y, Maddern G, Marks G, Stiegmann G, Taylor B (1997) Guidelines for conducting economic outcomes studies for endoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 11:308–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Taheri PA, Butz DA, Greenfield LJ (2000) Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission. J Am Coll Surg 191:123–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Noblett SE, Horgan AF (2007) A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21:404–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Buggy DJ, Smith G (1999) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia: better outcome after major surgery? Growing evidence suggests so. BMJ 319:530–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V (2007) Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost–benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:464–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost–benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–5 discussion 895–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91:409–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Franks PJ, Longman RJ, Kendrick AH, Kipling RM, Kennedy RH (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, Gage H, Lovell DP, Rockall TA (2007) Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:908–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Longman RJ, Kipling RM, Franks PJ, Sheffield JP, Evans LB, Soulsby M, Bulley SH, Kennedy RH (2006) The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:506–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of HPB and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK

    Francesco M. Polignano, Aaron J. Quyn, Rodrigo S. M. de Figueiredo, Nikola A. Henderson, Christoph Kulli & Iain S. Tait

Authors
  1. Francesco M. Polignano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aaron J. Quyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo S. M. de Figueiredo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikola A. Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christoph Kulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Iain S. Tait
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco M. Polignano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polignano, F.M., Quyn, A.J., de Figueiredo, R.S.M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22, 2564–2570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0110-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0110-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation