Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure—a comparative retrospective analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure has traditionally required laparotomy. This study compares our experience with laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Study design

All laparoscopic and open Hartmann’s reversal procedures performed between January 1998 and June 2006 were reviewed. Patients with laparoscopic reversal were retrospectively matched by age, body mass index (BMI), and indication to controls with open reversal. Demographic data, perioperative course, and postoperative complications were documented.

Results

We identified 41 patients who underwent laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure and these were matched to 41 patients with open reversal. The groups had similar average age and BMI. The predominant indication for surgery in both groups was diverticular disease. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in eight patients (19.5%), and was due to dense adhesions or difficulty in identification of the rectal stump. Adhesions were significantly greater in the conversion group (p <0.05), and the rectal stump was not marked in any of these cases. The most common short-term complications were ileus and surgical site infection. There were no anastomotic leaks and no mortalities. The mean operative times in the laparoscopic and open groups were 193 versus 209 min, respectively (p = 0.33). The laparoscopic group had a significantly lower estimated blood loss of 166 versus 326 mL (p < 0.0005), shorter time to bowel function return (4.1 versus 5.2 days, p < 0.05), and a shorter hospital stay (6.4 versus 8.0 days, p < 0.05). The major complication rate was also significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (4.8% versus 12.1%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure is a safe and practical alternative to open reversal. It can be performed with similar operative time, fewer complications, and a faster recovery time. Conversion during the reversal procedure was significantly impacted by severity of adhesions and marking of the rectal stump.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

body mass index

LAHR:

laparoscopic-assisted Hartmann’s reversal

OHR:

open Hartmann’s reversal

PCA:

patient-controlled analgesia

SICU:

surgical intensive care unit

References

  1. Hartmann H (1923) Note sur un procédé nouveau d'extirpation des cancers de la partie du côlon. Bull Mem Soc Chir Paris 49:1474–1477

    Google Scholar 

  2. Desai DC, Brennan EJ, Reilly JF, Smink RD (1998) Utility of the Hartmann procedure. Am J Surg 175:152–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demetriades D, Pezikis A, Melissas J, Parekh D, Pickles G (1988) Factors influencing the morbidity of colostomy closure. Am J Surg 155:594–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schilling MK, Maurer CA, Kollmar O, Buchler MW (2001) Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:699–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghorra SG, Rzeczycki TP, Natarajan R, Pricolo VE (1999) Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity. Am Surg 65:266–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Degiuli M, Mineccia M, Bertone A, Arrigoni A, Pennazio M, Spandre M, Cavallero M, Calvo F (2004) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 18:427–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alves A, Panis Y, Slim K, Heyd B, Kwiatkowski F, Mantion G, Association Française de Chirurgie (2005) French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Br J Surg 92:1520–1525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145

  11. Anderson CA, Fowler DL, White S, Wintz N (1993) Laparoscopic colostomy closure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:69–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorey TF, O’Connell PR, Waldron D, Cronin K, Kerin M, Fitzpatrick JM (1993) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 80:109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Costantino GN, Mukalian GG (1994) Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:429–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: a comparative analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:895–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A, Brown C, Brodribb AJ (1991) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 78:1167–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keck JO, Collopy BT, Ryan PJ, Fink R, Mackay JR, Woods RJ (1994) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety. Dis Colon Rectum 37:243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khosraviani K, Campbell WJ, Parks TG, Irwin ST (2000) Hartmann procedure revisited. Eur J Surg 166:878–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Livingston DH, Miller FB, Richardson JD (1989) Are the risks after colostomy closure exaggerated? Am J Surg 158:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mosdell DM, Doberneck RC (1991) Morbidity and mortality of ostomy closure. Am J Surg 162:633–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasukic S, Mesic D, Dizdarevic E, Keser D, Hadziselimovic S, Bazardzanovic M (2002) Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16:163–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Puente I, McKenney MG, Hartmann R (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 37:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Regadas FS, Siebra JA, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Reis Neto JA (1998) Complications in laparoscopic colorectal resection: main types and prevention. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:189–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vacher C, Zaghloul R, Borie F, Laporte S, Callafe R, Skawinski P, Leynau G, Domergue J (2002) Laparoscopic re-establishment of digestive continuity following Hartmann’s procedure. Retrospective study of the French Society of Endoscopic Surgery] Ann Chir 127:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khaikin M, Zmora O, Rosin D, Bar-Zakai B, Goldes Y, Shabtai M, Ayalon A, Munz Y (2006) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Endosc 20(12):1883–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG (2003) Adhesion Study Group Steering Committee. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1310–1319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, Corman M, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Becker JM, Monson JR, Kaufman HS, Beck DE, Bailey HR, Ludwig KA, Stamos MJ, Darzi A, Bleday R, Dorazio R, Madoff RD, Smith LE, Gearhart S, Lillemoe K, Gohl J (2006) Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

    Haggi Mazeh

  2. Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 East 98th Street, 1259, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Alexander J. Greenstein, Kristin Swedish, Scott Q. Nguyen, Aaron Lipskar, Kaare J. Weber, Edward H. Chin & Celia M. Divino

Authors
  1. Haggi Mazeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander J. Greenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristin Swedish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott Q. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aaron Lipskar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kaare J. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edward H. Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Celia M. Divino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia M. Divino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazeh, H., Greenstein, A.J., Swedish, K. et al. Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure—a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 23, 496–502 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0052-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0052-4

Key words

Search

Navigation