Abstract
Background
We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and costs associated with laparoscopic resection within an elective colorectal practice.
Method
Over a 12-month period data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing elective colorectal resection under the care of a single consultant surgeon. Thirty patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were case-matched by type of resection, disease process, and, where appropriate, cancer stage to patients having open surgery. A cost analysis was carried out incorporating cost of surgical bed stay, theater time, and specific equipment costs.
Results
In the 30 patients having laparoscopic resection, a conversion rate of 13% was observed. Surgery was performed for colorectal cancer in 83% of patients, and 53% of resections were rectal. No significant differences were found in age (65 versus 69 years, p = 0.415), BMI (27.4 versus 26.1, p = 0.527), POSSUM physiology score (16 versus 16.5, p = 0.102), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (2 versus 2, p = 0.171), or length of theater time (160 min versus 160 min, p = 0.233) between the laparoscopic and open patients. Hospital stay was reduced in the laparoscopic group (5 versus 9 days, p < 0.001). Average cost of surgical equipment used for a laparoscopic resection was greater than for open surgery (£912.39 versus £276.41, p = 0.001). Cost of hospital stay was significantly less (£1259.75 versus £2267.55, p < 0.001). Cost of operating room time was similar for the two groups (£2066.63 versus £1945.07, p = 0.152). Overall no significant cost difference could be found between open and laparoscopic resection (£4560.9 versus £4348.45, p = 0.976). More postoperative complications were seen in the open resection group (14 versus 4, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Intraoperative equipment costs are greater for laparoscopic resection than for open surgery. However, benefits can be seen in terms of quicker recovery and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery is a financially viable alternative to open resection in selected patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander J, Jacques JB, Mitchell K (1993) Laparoscopic assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 341: 249–250
COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic asssisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059
COST Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484
Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238: 67–72
EAES Consensus Conference (2002) Lisbon, Consensus Proceedings, Laparoscopic resection of colonic carcinoma. http://www.eaes-eur.org/conststem/rescolcar.html
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 1718–1726
Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150
Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookion C, Tsushima G, Phillips EH (1998) Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 832–838
Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139: 39–42
Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229
Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1187–1192
Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, D’Ambrosio G (2002) Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16: 596–602
Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10: 15–18
Musser DJ, Boorse RC, Madera F, Reed JF 3rd (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost? Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 1–5
Nduka C, Monson J, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A (1994) Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 81: 648–652
Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bagge E (1997) Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg 21: 214–217
Psaila J, Bulley SH, Ewings P, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (1998) Outcome following laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 85: 662–664
Vardulaki KA, Bennett-Lloyd BD, Parfitt J, Normand C, Paisley S, Darzi A, Reeves B (2000) A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: London
Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela RL (2001) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 15: 450–454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noblett, S.E., Horgan, A.F. A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21, 404–408 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9016-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9016-8