Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The incidence of aberrant bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not yet been adequately examined. This study aimed to clarify the types of normal cystic ducts and the incidence of aberrant extrahepatic bile ducts, and to search for a method of avoiding injuries during LC.

Methods

Aberrant hepatic ducts were retrospectively categorized into five types according to the pattern of the cystic ducts and the accessory hepatic ducts by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or multidetector three-dimensional computed tomography using drip infusion cholangiography. The aberrant bile ducts were classified as type A (merging at the right side of the common bile duct), type B (merging at the anterior side), or type C (merging at the posterior left side).

Results

The intrahepatic bile ducts and cystic duct were clearly shown for 1,044 of the 1,278 patients who underwent LC. Secondary branches of aberrant cystic ducts were observed in 37 cases (3.5%), and accessory hepatic ducts were observed in 30 cases (2.9%). A comparison of the difficulties encountered with LC for each type based on the merging patterns of cystic ducts showed that type C needed a much longer operation time for LC than the other types.

Conclusions

A preoperative evaluation of the bile duct tract and the accessory hepatic duct before LC is important. Patients with a cystic duct merging normally into the posterior left side of the common hepatic duct (type C) experienced difficulty when undergoing LC. The authors have safely performed LC with the use of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in type D cases (cystic duct merging with the right hepatic duct), in type IV cases (cystic duct merging with an accessory hepatic duct).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184: 571–5782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andren-Sandberg A, Johansson S, Bengmark S (1985) Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy: II. Results of treatment. Ann Surg 201: 452–4553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berci G, Hamlin JA (1995) Corrective treatment and anatomic considerations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries. J Am Coll Surg 180: 765–7664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Tsalis K, Demetriades C, Betsis D (2002) Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-related and operative risk factors. Endoscopy 34: 286–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN (1998) Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 85: 1364–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Edye M, Dalvi A, Canin-Endres J, Baskin-Bey E, Salky B (2002) Intraoperative cholangiography is still indicated after preoperative endoscopic cholangiography for gallstone disease. Surg Endosc 16: 799–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischmann D, Ringl H, Schofl R, Potzi R, Kontrus M, Henk C, Bankier AA, Kettenbach J, Mostbeck GH (1996) Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology; 198: 861–868

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyazaki T, Matsuda Y (1997) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 1123–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashmonai M, Kopelman D (1995) An anomaly of the extrahepatic biliary system. Arch Surg 130: 673–67510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirao K, Miyazaki A, Fujimoto T, Isomoto I, Hayashi K (2000) Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 713–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury: surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132: 826–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamshidi M, Obermeyer RJ, Garcia G, Hashmi M (1999) Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leak secondary to an accessory duct of Luschka. Int Surg 84: 86–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinami S, Yao T, Kurachi M, Ishizaki Y (1999) Clinical evaluation of 3D-CT cholangiography for preoperative examination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastroenterol 34: 111–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Svanvik J, Anderberg B (1996) Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 83: 171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwon AH, Inui H, Imamura A, Uetsuji S, Kamiyama Y (1998) Preoperative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: feasibility of using spiral computed tomography. Ann Surg 227: 351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Longmire WP Jr, Tompkins RK (1975) Lesions of the segmental and lobar hepatic ducts. Ann Surg 182: 478–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12: 315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McMahon AJ, Fullarton G, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82: 307–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mergener K, Strobel JC, Suhocki P, Jowell PS, Enns RA, Branch MS, Baillie J (1999) The role of ERCP in diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 50: 527–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seibert D, Matulis SR, Griswold F (1996) A rare right hepatic duct anatomical variant discovered after laparoscopic bile duct transection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 61–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Suhocki PV, Meyers WC (1999) Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 955–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Kawai M, Ueno M, Yamaue H (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238: 97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H (2002) Indication and procedure for treatment of hepatolithiasis. Arch Surg 137: 149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H (2004) Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 51: 346–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, Onishi H, Yamaue H (2002). Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1594–1597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vezakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, Martin IG, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (2000) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14: 1118–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright KD, Wellwood JM (1998) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Br J Surg 85: 191–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong YC, Wang LJ, Chen RJ, Chen CJ (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of extrahepatic bile duct disruption. Eur Radiol 12: 2488–2490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan

    K. Uchiyama, M. Tani, M. Kawai, M. Ueno, T. Hama & H. Yamaue

Authors
  1. K. Uchiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Tani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Kawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Hama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Yamaue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Yamaue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uchiyama, K., Tani, M., Kawai, M. et al. Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20, 1119–1123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0689-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0689-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation