Skip to main content
Log in

Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Stereo-endoscopy has become a commonly used technology. In many comparative studies striking advantages of stereo-endoscopy over two-dimensional presentation could not be proven. To show the potential and fields for further improvement of this technology is the aim of this article.

Method

The physiological basis of three-dimensional vision limitations of current stereo-endoscopes is discussed and fields for further research are indicated. New developments in spatial picture acquisition and spatial picture presentation are discussed.

Results

Current limitations of stereo-endoscopy that prevent a better ranking in comparative studies with two-dimensional presentation are mainly based on insufficient picture acquisition.

Conclusion

Devices for three-dimensional picture presentation are at a more advanced developmental stage than devices for three-dimensional picture acquisition. Further research should emphasize the development of new devices for three-dimensional picture acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Arezzo T Kees W Kunert M Gregori ParticleDe G Buess (2000) ArticleTitle[Shadow optic. An endoscpoe with optimized light]. Chir Ital 52 451–453 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ltlemsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11190539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H Becker A Melzer MO Schurr G Buess (1993) ArticleTitle3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1 40–46 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czis1amtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8050009

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DH Birkett LG Josephs J Este-McDonald (1994) ArticleTitleA new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8 1448–1451 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7osVSltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7878517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MF Catalano J Dam ParticleVan R Bedford RM Cothren MV Sivak SuffixJr (1993) ArticleTitlePreliminary evaluation of the prototype stereoscopic endoscope: precise three-dimensional measurement system. Gastrointest Endosc 39 23–28 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s3gt1ektg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8454141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AC Chan SC Chung AP Yim JY Lau EK Ng AK Li (1997) ArticleTitleComparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11 438–440 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3pvVWrug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9153170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WK Cheah JE Lenzi J So F Dong CK Kum P Goh (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Ecndosc 15 990–991 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrlvVCrtw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. YJ Chee SW Lee K Park (1999) ArticleTitleNewly developing endoscopic devices—shadow optics and micromachine. Yonsei Med J 40 550–553 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7is1yktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10661031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. G Crosthwaite T Chung P Dunkley S Shimi A Cuschieri (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 82 849–851 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2MzltlKlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7627529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Cuschieri (1991) ArticleTitleMinimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy. Am J Surg 161 404–407 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7lvVSqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1825768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. YM Dion F Gaillard (1997) ArticleTitleVisual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems. Surg Endosc 11 995–1000 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitFKjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9381356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DW Eby ML Braunstein (1995) ArticleTitleThe perceptual flattening of three-dimensional scenes enclosed by a frame. Perception 24 981–993 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287hslCnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8552462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. I Fine RA Jacobs (2002) ArticleTitleComparing perceptual learning across tasks: A review. J Vis 2 190–203 Occurrence Handle12678592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WP Geis (1996) ArticleTitleHead-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report. Surg Endosc 10 768–770 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283otFKisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8662438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. AG Gordon AL Magos (1989) ArticleTitleThe development of laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 3 429–449 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c7isFertg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2533004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. GB Hanna SM Shimi A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351 248–251 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hvVaktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9457094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J Harms A Schneider (2002) ArticleTitle[Optoelectronic display system for minimal invasive laparoscopic operations: initial experiences with new face-mounted display video eyeglasses]. Biomed Tech (Berlin) 47 38–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jvF2mtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DM Herron JC Lantis J Maykel C Basu SD Schwaitzberg (1999) ArticleTitleThe 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 13 751–755 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlvF2jtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10430678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J Hofmeister TG Frank A Cuschieri NJ Wade (2001) ArticleTitlePerceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 8 12–24 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzps1agtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11337734

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J Holden TG Frank A Cuschieri (1997) ArticleTitleDeveloping technology for suspended imaging for minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 4 74–79 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BC2sbgs12mtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10401143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DB Jones JD Brewer NJ Soper (1996) ArticleTitleThe influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6 191–197 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zjt12qtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8743361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. W Kunert E Flemming MO Schurr GF Buess (1997) ArticleTitle[Optics with natural appearing added illumination]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 114 1232–1234 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jsFCktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9574387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. E Matouschek H Becker (1995) ArticleTitle[The value of 3D video endoscopy for surgical procedures]. Bildgebung 62 174–178 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fkt1Oguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7496113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EM McDougall JJ Soble JS Wolf SuffixJr SY Nakada OM Elashry RV Clayman (1996) ArticleTitleComparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 10 371–374 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fis1Gmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8872737

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. TN Mitchell J Robertson AG Nagy A Lomax (1993) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional endoscopic imaging for minimal access surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38 285–292 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7htFSmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7506780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. JR Monson (1993) ArticleTitleAdvanced techniques in abdominal surgery. Br Med J 307 1346–1350 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FotVWntg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. U Morgenstern R Freyer (1997) ArticleTitleVisualisierung medizinischer Daten mittels Dresdner Autostereoskopischem Display. Biomed Tech Ber 42 IssueIDSuppl 341–342

    Google Scholar 

  27. MD Mueller C Camartin E Dreher W Hanggi (1999) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13 469–472 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksVOnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10227944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. UD Muller-Richter A Limberger P Weber WJ Spitzer M Schilling (2003) ArticleTitleComparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display. Surg Endosc 17 502–504

    Google Scholar 

  29. UD Muller-Richter HJ Malig A Schwerdtner M Lang K Hille KW Ruprecht (1999) ArticleTitle[Initial clinical experiences with the Dresden 3D display in conjunction with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT)]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 215 182–185 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslGqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10528284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Müller-Richter UDA (2001) Die Vorteile des auf Echtzeitbildverarbeitung basierenden autostereoskopischen Dresdner 3D-Displays bei der Analyse von Geometriedaten, die mit dem Heidelberg Retina Tomographen gewonnen wurden. Dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes

  31. E Neugebauer H Troidl CK Kum E Eypasch M Miserez A Paul (1995) ArticleTitleThe E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements—September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 9 550–563 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mvgs1yhuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7676385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. E Neugebauer BM Ure R Lefering EP Eypasch H Troidl (1994) ArticleTitleTechnology assessment of endoscopic surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 61 13–19 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ovFWhsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. GS Oshinsky AD Smith (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic needles and trocars: an overview of designs and complications. J Laparoendosc Surg 2 117–125 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383ot1Witg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1534491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. K Peitgen MV Walz MV Walz G Holtmann FW Eigler (1996) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44 262–267 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FjvFOqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8885344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. A Pietrabissa E Scarcello A Carobbi F Mosca (1994) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2 315–317 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M3hvFCisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7704553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. RM Satava (1993) ArticleTitle3-D vision technology applied to advanced minimally invasive surgery systems. Surg Endosc 7 429–431 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FisVCqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8211624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. J Sheedy N Bergstrom (2002) ArticleTitlePerformance and comfort on near-eye computer displays. Optom Vis Sci 79 306–312 Occurrence Handle12035988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. N Taffinder SG Smith J Huber RC Russell A Darzi (1999) ArticleTitleThe effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13 1087–1092 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivVCjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10556444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Turner S (2002) Coupling retinal scanning displays to the human visual system: visual system response and engineering considerations. Doctoral Thesis, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  40. P Bergen Particlevan W Kunert J Bessell GF Buess (1998) ArticleTitleComparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 12 948–954 Occurrence Handle9632868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. P Bergen Particlevan W Kunert GF Buess (1999) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional (3-D) video systems: bi-channel or single-channel optics? Endoscopy 31 732–737 Occurrence Handle10604615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. P Bergen Particlevan W Kunert GF Buess (2000) ArticleTitleThe effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 14 71–74 Occurrence Handle10653241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. M Vierra (1995) ArticleTitleMinimally invasive surgery. Ann Rev Med 46 147–158 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXkvFSksrc%3D Occurrence Handle7598451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. E Viirre R Johnston H Pryor S Nagata TA Furness SuffixIII (1997) ArticleTitleLaser safety analysis of a retinal scanning display system. J Laser Appl 9 253–260 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXntlGmur4%3D Occurrence Handle10174266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. E Viirre H Pryor S Nagata III Furness TA (1998) ArticleTitleThe virtual retinal display: a newtechnology for virtual reality and augmented vision in medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 50 252–257 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mt1anug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10180549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. NJ Wade M Swanston (1991) An introduction to visual perception Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  47. R Wenzl R Lehner U Vry N Pateisky P Sevelda P Husslein (1994) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional video-endoscopy: clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet 344 1621–1622 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FnsFWruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7983998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yy Yeh LD Silverstein (1990) ArticleTitleLimits of fusion and depth judgment in stereoscopic color displays. Hum Factors 32 45–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czjtVeitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2376407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. YY Yeh LD Silverstein (1992) ArticleTitleSpatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Hum Factors 34 583–600 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FptlKjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1459568

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. J Zobel (1993) ArticleTitleBasics of three-dimensional endoscopic vision. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1 36–39 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czis1amsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8050008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. FW Zonneveld AG Huitema AH Joel MA Fernandez PF Van-Waes B Ter-Haar-Romeny (1996) ArticleTitleLenticular system: full-color, limited-angle, autostereoscopic alternative to holography. Radiographics 16 393–400 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ksVWhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8966295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. D. A Mueller-Richter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller-Richter, U.D.A., Limberger, A., Weber, P. et al. Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy. Surg Endosc 18, 942–947 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9097-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9097-6

Keywords

Navigation