Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is a widely used procedure that is generally considered to be safe. Methods: Of a total of 33,854 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during 1999 under the care of surgeons in Scotland, 153 (0.004%) died. We reviewed the case notes of these 153 patients. Results: Death was directly related to endoscopy in 20 of 153 cases (13%), most commonly due to gastrointestinal perforation or acute pancreatitis. Ninety-one percent (139) of the patients undergoing endoscopy were American Society of Anesthesiologists grades (ASA) 3–5, and 88% received intravenous sedation; an anesthetist was present in 31 cases (20%). Oxygen was administered to 45% of patients during the endoscopy. In 56% of the procedures, there was monitoring of electrocardiograms (ECG), pulse oximetry, or blood pressure readings. Conclusions: Although deaths after endoscopy may be unavoidable, clinicians undertaking upper GI endoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in ASA 3–5 patients should provide oxygen therapy and cardiovascular monitoring, and keep accurate records. The involvement of an anesthetist in airway management and the administration of intravenous sedation should be actively considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IR Appadurai RJ Delicta PD Carey (1995) ArticleTitleMonitoring during endoscopy: attention to sedation techniques may reduce mortality. BMJ 311 452–453 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA28jpsFE%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. GD Bell GP Spickett PA Reeve A Moren RI , Logan (1987) ArticleTitleIntraveous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age and sex of the patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol . .

    Google Scholar 

  3. GD Bell RF McCloy JE Charleton D Campbell NA Dent MWL Gear RF Logan CH Swan (1991) ArticleTitleRecommendations for the standards of sedation and patient monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 32 823–827 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6A3cbpt1M%3D Occurrence Handle1855692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. InstitutionalAuthorNameBritish Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee (2002) ArticleTitleNon-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines. Gut 51 IssueIDsuppl 4 1–6 Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.51.1.1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zjtl2rtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12077078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MF Chan (1996) ArticleTitleComplications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 6 287–303

    Google Scholar 

  6. AC Clarke L Chiragakis LC Hillman GL Kaye (2002) ArticleTitleSedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists. Med J Aust 76 158–161

    Google Scholar 

  7. GA Clarke BC Jacobson RJ Hammett DL Carr-Locke (2001) ArticleTitleThe indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort. Endoscopy 33 580–584 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2001-15313 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FisFKmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11473328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R Enns MA Eloubedi K Mergener PS Jowell MS Branch TM Pappas J Baillie (2002) ArticleTitleERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 34 293–298 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2002-23650 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387pvFegtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11932784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ML Freeman DB Nelson S Sherman GB Haber ME Herman PJ Dorsher JP Moore MB Fennerty ME Ryan MJ Shaw (1996) ArticleTitleComplications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 909–918 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199609263351301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA28rislE%3D Occurrence Handle8782497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ML Freeman JA DiSario DB Nelson MB Fennerty JG Lee DJ Bjorkman CS Overby J Aas ME Ryan GS Bochna et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRisk factors for post ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicentre study. Gastrointest Endosc 54 425–434 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mge.2001.117550 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrlt1CisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11577302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JB Gross (2002) ArticleTitlePractice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesiology 96 1004–1017

    Google Scholar 

  12. R Hart M Classen (1991) ArticleTitleComplications of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 23 245–246

    Google Scholar 

  13. G Larson T Schmidt J Gott S Bond CA O’Connor JD Richardson (1987) ArticleTitleUpper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: predictors of outcome. Surgery 100 765–773

    Google Scholar 

  14. R McCloy (1992) ArticleTitleAsleep on the job: sedation and monitoring during endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 192 97–101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD28fgtFM%3D Occurrence Handle1439577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. M Michalodimitrakis P Cristodoulou AM Tsatsakis I Askoxilakis I Stiakakis I Mouzas (1999) ArticleTitleDeath related to midazolam overdose during endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Am J Forens Med Pathol 20 93–97 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000433-199903000-00022 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3itlShug%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MA Quine GD Bell RF McCloy JE Charlton HB Devlin A Hopkins (1995) ArticleTitleProspective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods. Gut 35 462–467

    Google Scholar 

  17. O Reiertsen J Skjoto CD Jacobsen AR Rosseland (1987) ArticleTitleComplications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy—five year experience in a central hospital. Endoscopy 19 1–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC287mslQ%3D Occurrence Handle3493897

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. TA Rockall RF Logan HB Devlin TC Northfield (1995) ArticleTitleIncidence of and mortality from acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. BMJ 311 222–226 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA2MzhtF0%3D Occurrence Handle7627034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. TA Rockall RF Logan HB Devlin TC Northfield (1996) ArticleTitleSelection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: national audit of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 347 1138–1140 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MfjvVY%3D Occurrence Handle8609747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. SJ Rudolph BK Landsverk ML Freeman (2003) ArticleTitleEndotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI haemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 57 58–61 Occurrence Handle12518132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. AM Thompson KGM Park F Kerr A Munro (1992) ArticleTitleSafety of fibreoptic endoscopy: analysis of cardiorespiratory events. Br J Surg 79 1046–1049 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD2crjsFE%3D Occurrence Handle1422716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. GC Vitale M George K McIntyre GM Larson TJ Wieman (1996) ArticleTitleEndoscopic management of benign and malignant biliary strictures. Am J Surg 171 553–557 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00031-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1M7hslc%3D Occurrence Handle8678198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. InstitutionalAuthorNameBritish Society of Gastroenterology, Working Party Report (2001) Provision of endoscopy related services in district general hospitals. British Society of Gastroenterology London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gillian McPhillips, BSc (Hons) and Zeg Ashraf, MA (Hons) for statistical advice and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland , UK

    A. M. Thompson

  2. Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons, 232–242 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5RJ, Scotland, UK

    A. M. Thompson, W. Murray, G. L. Ritchie, H. D. Burton & P. A. Stonebridge

  3. Department of Anaesthetics, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK

    D. J. Wright

  4. Department of Surgery, The Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland, UK

    W. Murray

Authors
  1. A. M. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. J. Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. L. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. D. Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. A. Stonebridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, A., Wright, D., Murray, W. et al. Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?. Surg Endosc 18, 22–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9069-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9069-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation