Abstract
Studies were performed on the effect of CaCO3 and CaCl2 supplementation to fermentation medium for ethanol production from xylose, glucose, or their mixtures using Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis. Both of these chemicals were found to improve maximum ethanol concentration and ethanol productivity. Use of xylose alone resulted in the production of 20.68 ± 0.44 g L−1 ethanol with a productivity of 0.17 ± 0.00 g L−1 h−1, while xylose plus 3 g L−1 CaCO3 resulted in the production of 24.68 ± 0.75 g L−1 ethanol with a productivity of 0.21 ± 0.01 g L−1 h−1. Use of xylose plus glucose in combination with 3 g L−1 CaCO3 resulted in the production of 47.37 ± 0.55 g L−1 ethanol (aerobic culture), thus resulting in an ethanol productivity of 0.39 ± 0.00 g L−1 h−1. These values are 229 % of that achieved in xylose medium. Supplementation of xylose and glucose medium with 0.40 g L−1 CaCl2 resulted in the production of 44.84 ± 0.28 g L−1 ethanol with a productivity of 0.37 ± 0.02 g L−1 h−1. Use of glucose plus 3 g L−1 CaCO3 resulted in the production of 57.39 ± 1.41 g L−1 ethanol under micro-aerophilic conditions. These results indicate that supplementation of cellulosic sugars in the fermentation medium with CaCO3 and CaCl2 would improve economics of ethanol production from agricultural residues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dewey DYR, Kim YJ, Kim JH (1984) Effect of Air Supplement on the Performance of Continuous Ethanol Fermentation System. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:12–16
Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL (2006) Nitrogen sources and mineral optimization enhance D-xylose conversion to ethanol by the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:1285–1296
Azam MM, Ezeji TC, Qureshi N (2014) Novel technologies for enhanced production of ethanol: Impact of high productivity on process economics. Eur Chem Bull 3(9):904–910
Casey GP, Ingledew M (1986) Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Crit Rev Microbiol 13:219–290
Vega JL, Clausen EC, Gaddy JL (1987) Acetate addition to an immobilized yeast column for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:429–435
U.S. ethanol production and the renewable fuel standard RIN bank (2013) http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=11551 (website accessed Aug. 5, 2015)
Saha BC (2003) Hemicellulose bioconversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:279–291
Dien BS, Nichols NN, O’Bryan PJ, Bothast RJ (2000) Development of new ethanologenic Escherichia coli strains for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84:181–196
Qureshi N, Dien BS, Liu S, Saha BC, Cotta MA, Hughes S, Hector R (2012) Genetically engineered Escherichia coli FBR5: Part II. Ethanol production from xylose and simultaneous product recovery. Biotechnol Prog 28:1179–1185
Qureshi N, Dien BS, Liu S, Saha BC, Hector R, Cotta MA, Hughes S (2012) Genetically engineered Escherichia coli FBR5: Part I. Comparison of high cell density bioreactors for enhanced ethanol production from xylose. Biotechnol Prog 28:1167–1178
Mancilha IMD, Pearson AM, Waller GJ, Hogaboam BB (1984) Increasing alcohol yield by selected yeast fermentation of sweet sorghum: 1. Evaluation of yeast strains for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:632–634
Knauf M (2006) Specific yeasts developed for modern ethanol production. Sugar Industry 131:753–758
Cheryan M, Mehaia MA (1984) Ethanol production in a membrane recycle bioreactor: conversion of glucose using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 19:204–208
Afschar AS, Biebl H, Schaller K, Schugerl K (1985) Production of acetone and butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in continuous culture with cell recycle. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 22:394–398
Rogers PL, Lee KJ, Skotnicki ML, Tribe DE (1982) Ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. In: Fiechter A (ed) Adv Biochem Eng 23:37–84
Lee JM, Pollard JF, Coulman GA (1983) Ethanol fermentation with cell recycling: computer simulation. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:497–511
Hahn-Hägerdal B, Jeppsson H, Skoog K, Prior BA (1994) Biochemistry and physiology of xylose fermentation by yeasts. Enz Microb Technol 16:933–943
du Preez JC, van Driessel B, Prior BA (1989) Ethanol tolerance of Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae strains in fed-batch cultures at controlled low dissolved oxygen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 30:53–58
Lee T-Y, Kim M-D, Kim K-Y, Park K, Ryu Y-W, Seo J-H (2000) A parametric study on ethanol production from xylose by Pichia stipitis. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 5:27–31
Qureshi N, Liu S, Ezeji TC (2013) Cellulosic butanol production from agricultural biomass and residues: Recent advances in technology. In: Lee JW (ed) Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 247–265
Qureshi N, Hodge D, Vertes A (2014) Biorefineries: Integrated biochemical processes for liquid biofuels. Elsevier, New York
Dominguez DC (2004) Calcium signaling in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 54:291–297
Ikura M, Osawa M, Ames JB (2002) The role of calcium binding proteins in the control of transcription structure and function. BioEssays 24:625–636
Mekalanos JJ (1992) Environment signals controlling expression of virulence determinants in bacteria. J Bacteriol 174:1–7
Han B, Ujor V, Lai LB, Gopalan V, Ezeji TC (2013) Use of proteomic analysis to elucidate the role of calcium on acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation in Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:282–293
Acknowledgments
NQ would like to thank Bruce Dien (United States Department of Agricultural, National Center for Agricultural utilization, Peoria, IL, USA) for reading this manuscript and providing constructive comments. MMA would like to thank the US–INDIA Education Foundation, New Delhi, India, and Fulbright Commission, Washington DC, USA for the Fulbright Fellowship and financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Funding information
Additional financial support was from the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), and the Hatch grant (Project No. OHO01333).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing scientific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okonkwo, C.C., Azam, M.M., Ezeji, T.C. et al. Enhancing ethanol production from cellulosic sugars using Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis . Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 1023–1032 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1580-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1580-2