Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accelerated start-up of moving bed biofilm reactor by using a novel suspended carrier with porous surface

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel suspended carrier with porous surface was firstly prepared by coating a sponge on the inside and outside of a hard polyethylene ring. Herein the effects of the sponge thickness (0, 2, 4, 6 mm) and pore size (17, 45, 85 pores per inch, ppi) on the performance of the start-up stage in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) were investigated. The results indicated that the home-made carrier with the sponge thickness of 4 mm and the pore size of 45 ppi, defined as SC4-45, showed the best performance, which obtained high biomass concentration of 2,136.6 mg/L, oxygen uptake rate for COD of 150.1 mg O2/h and oxygen uptake rate for NH4 +-N of 17.4 mg O2/h. The DGGE profiles of the biofilms obtained in SC4-45 and a commercial carrier showed a similar community as the Dice similarity coefficients between two samples was 0.72. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis reveals dominance of Sphaerotilus sp. and Aeromonas sp. in the community of both samples. Moreover, for the MBBR based on SC4-45, COD and NH4 +-N removal rates reached 99.5 ± 1.1 and 93.6 ± 2.3 % at the end of the start-up stage, much higher than those of the commercial carrier, 74.9 ± 2.7 and 40.0 ± 1.8 %, respectively. These indicated the novel carrier obtained a quick start-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daigger GT, Boltz JP (2011) Trickling filter and trickling filter-suspended growth process design and operation: a state-of-the-art review. Water Environ Res 83:388–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou L, Zhang Z, Jiang W, Guo W, Ngo HH, Meng X, Fan J, Zhao J, Xia S (2008) Effects of low-concentration Cr (VI) on the performance and the membrane fouling of a submerged membrane bioreactor in the treatment of municipal wastewater. Biofouling 30(1):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mixtli CP, Karim AA, Jesus Alberto MG, Marcela MT, Rolando TM, Luz MM, Marcelo V, Roberto PS (2012) Time and cost efficient biodegradation of diesel in a continuous-upflow packed bed biofilm reactor and effect of surfactant GAELE. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:1131–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Filho JLRP, Sader LT, Damianovic MHRZ, Foresti E, Silva EL (2010) Performance evaluation of packing materials in the removal of hydrogen sulfide in gas-phase biofilters: polyurethane foam, sugarcane bagasse, and coconut fiber. Chem Eng J 158:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pokhrel D, Hettiaratchi P, Patrick KS (2011) Methane diffusion coefficient in compost and soil-compost mixtures in gas phase biofilter. Chem Eng J 169:200–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sevillano X, Isasi JR, Penas FJ (2012) Performance of a fluidized-bed bioreactor with hydrogel biomass carrier under extremely low-nitrogen availability and effect of nitrogen amendments. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:402–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Papadikis K, Gu S, Bridgwater AV (2010) A CFD approach on the effect of particle size on char entrainment in bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Biomass Bioenerg 34:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu XB, Xu K, Wang Z, Ding LL, Ren HQ (2013) Characteristics of biofilm attaching to carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor used to treat vitamin C wastewater. Scanning 35:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tawfik A, El-Gohary F, Temmink H (2010) Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33:267–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Currie JA, Harrison NR, Wang L, Jones MI, Brooks MS (2007) A preliminary study of processing seafood shells for eutrophication control. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2:460–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gapes DJ, Keller J (2009) Impact of oxygen mass transfer on nitrification reactions in suspended carrier reactor biofilms. Process Biochem 44:43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aygun A, Nas B, Berktay A (2008) Influence of high organic loading rates on COD removal and sludge production in moving bed biofilm reactor. Environ Eng Sci 25:1311–1316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Araujo MM Jr, Lermontov A, Araujo PL, Zaiat M (2013) Reduction of sludge generation by the addition of support material in a cyclic activated sludge system for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 143:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tawfik A, Badr N, Abu Taleb E, El-Senousy W (2012) Sewage treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sponge reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor based on polyurethane carrier material. Desalin Water Treat 37:350–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, Wu M, Xing M, Yang J, Gao N, Pan M (2014) Impacts of temperature and nitrifying community on nitrification kinetics in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating polluted raw water. Chem Eng J 236:242–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zekker I, Rikmann E, Tenno T, Saluste A, Tomingas M, Menert A, Loorits L, Lemmiksoo V, Tenno T (2012) Achieving nitritation and anammox enrichment in a single moving-bed biofilm reactor treating reject water. Environ Technol 33:703–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zekker I, Rikmann E, Tenno T, Lemmiksoo V, Menert A, Loorits L, Vabamäe P, Tomingas M, Tenno T (2012) Anammox enrichment from reject water on blank biofilm carriers and carriers containing nitrifying biomass: operation of two moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR). Biodegradation 23:547–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zekker I, Rikmann E, Tenno T, Vabamäe P, Kroon K, Loorits L, Saluste A, Tenno T (2012) Effect of HCO3− concentration on anammox nitrogen removal rate in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Environ Technol 33:2263–2271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen TT, Ngo H, Guo W, Johnston A, Listowski A (2010) Effects of sponge size and type on the performance of an up-flow sponge bioreactor in primary treated sewage effluent treatment. Bioresour Technol 101:1416–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Garcia ML, Lapa KR, Foresti E, Zaiat M (2008) Effects of bed materials on the performance of an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating domestic sewage. J Environ Manag 88:1471–1477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valdivia A, Gonzalez-Martinez S, Wilderer PA (2007) Biological nitrogen removal with three different SBBR. Water Sci Technol 55:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Delatolla R, Berk D, Tufenkji N (2008) Rapid and reliable quantification of biofilm weight and nitrogen content of biofilm attached to polystyrene beads. Water Res 42:3082–3088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zekker I, Kroon K, Rikmann E, Tenno T, Tomingas M, Vabamäe P, Vlaeminck SE, Tenno T (2012) Accelerating effect of hydroxylamine and hydrazine on nitrogen removal rate in moving bed biofilm reactor. Biodegradation 23:739–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertin L, Lampis S, Todaro D, Scoma A, Vallini G, Marchetti L, Majone M, Fava F (2010) Anaerobic acidogenic digestion of olive mill wastewaters in biofilm reactors packed with ceramic filters or granular activated carbon. Water Res 44:4537–4549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hille A, He M, Ochmann C, Neu TR, Horn H (2009) Application of two component biodegradable carriers in a particle-fixed biofilm airlift suspension reactor: development and structure of biofilms. Bioprocess Biosystems Eng 32:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Odegaard H, Gisvold B, Strickland J (2000) The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process. Water Sci Technol 41:383–391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Comett I, Gonzalez-Martinez S, Wilderer P (2004) Treatment of leachate from the anaerobic fermentation of solid wastes using two biofilm support media. Water Sci Technol 49:287–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rasmussen K, Lewandowski Z (1998) Microelectrode measurements of local mass transport rates in heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:302–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei FS (2002) Monitoring and analysis method of water and wastewater. National Environmental Protection Agency, 4th edn. China Environmental Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chaiwat R, Tawan L, Benedict L, Eakalak K (2010) Relationship between respirometric activity and community of entrapped nitrifying bacteria: implications for partial nitrification. Enzyme Microb Technol 46:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorgensa JF, Van Zylb WH, Knoetze JH (2005) Reliability of methods for the determination of specific substrate consumption rates in batch culture. Biochem Eng J 25:109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan C, Ma F, Qiu S (2013) Impact of carbon to nitrogen ratio on nitrogen removal at a low oxygen concentration in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Water Sci Technol 67:612–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tay JH, Liu QS, Liu Y (2001) The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:227–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Beer DD, Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z (1996) Liquid flow and mass transport in heterogeneous biofilms. Water Res 30:2761–2765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Awong J, Bitton G, Koopman B (1985) ATP oxygen uptake rate and INT-dehydrogenase activity of actinomycete foams. Water Res 19:917–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nsabimana E, Belan A, Bohatier J (1999) Analysis at the genomospecies level of microbial populations changes in activated sludge: the case of Aeromonas. Water Res 34:1696–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jassby D, Xiao Y, Schuler AJ (2014) Biomass density and filament length synergistically affect activated sludge settling: systematic quantification and modeling. Water Res 48(1):457–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu B, Liao X, Lian R, Ding L, Xu K, Ren H (2011) COD removal from expanded granular sludge bed effluent using a moving bed biofilm reactor and their microbial community analysis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:915–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen Q, Qu L, Tong G, Ni J (2011) Simultaneous nutrients and carbon removal from low-strength domestic wastewater with an immobilized microorganism biological aerated filter. Water Sci Technol 63:885–890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang F (2006) Biological properties of material and structure of suspended bio-carriers and cage-type bioreactor. Dissertation for Ph.D. South China University of Technology

  41. Qiao XL, Chen QX, Zhang ZJ (2008) Comparative study of nitrification performances of immobilized cell fluidized bed reactor and contact oxidation biofilm reactor in treating high strength ammonia wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83:84–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rahimi Y, Torabian A, Mehrdadi N, Shahmoradi B (2011) Simultaneous nitrification–denitrification and phosphorus removal in a fixed bed sequencing batch reactor (FBSBR). J Hazard Mater 185:852–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Walters E, Hille A, He M, Ochmann C, Horn H (2009) Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in a biofilm airlift suspension (BAS) reactor with biodegradable carrier material. Water Res 43:4461–4468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gong L, Jun L, Yang Q, Wang S, Ma B, Peng Y (2012) Biomass characteristics and simultaneous nitrification–denitrification under long sludge retention time in an integrated reactor treating rural domestic sewage. Bioresour Technol 119:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang S, Yang F, Fu Z, Lei R (2009) Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 100:2369–2374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Khan SJ, Ilyas S, Javid S, Visvanathan C, Jegatheesan V (2011) Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol 102:5331–5336

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Nature Science Foundations of China (20977117, 21107146), Nature Foundations of Guangdong Province (92510027501000005), Science and Technology Research Programs of Guangzhou City (2012J4300118) and Project of Education Bureau of Guangdong Province (cgzhzd1001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (121pgy20) and Innovative Talents Training Funding of Doctoral Students of Sun Yat-sen University and Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student Granted by Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, People’s Republic of China

    Xin Chen, Lingjun Kong, Xingyu Wang, Shuanghong Tian & Ya Xiong

  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, Guangzhou, 510275, People’s Republic of China

    Xin Chen, Lingjun Kong, Xingyu Wang, Shuanghong Tian & Ya Xiong

Authors
  1. Xin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lingjun Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xingyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuanghong Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ya Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuanghong Tian or Ya Xiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Kong, L., Wang, X. et al. Accelerated start-up of moving bed biofilm reactor by using a novel suspended carrier with porous surface. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 273–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1266-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1266-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation