Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Costs and benefits of late nesting in cliff swallows

  • Population ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many organisms of temperate latitudes exhibit declines in reproductive success as the breeding season advances. Experiments can delay the onset of reproduction for early breeders to investigate the consequences of late nesting, but it is rarely possible to observe a distinct second round of nesting in species that normally nest only once. The colonial cliff swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) is a migratory songbird that has a relatively short breeding season in the western Great Plains, USA, with birds rarely nesting late in the summer. Previous work suggested that ectoparasitism is a primary reason why reproductive success in this species declines over the summer. At colony sites where nests were fumigated to remove ectoparasitic swallow bugs (Oeciacus vicarius), cliff swallows frequently undertook a distinct round of late nesting after previously fledging young that year. Mark-recapture revealed that late-nesting pairs at these colonies produced fewer offspring that survived to the next breeding season, and that survival of late-nesting adults was lower during the next year, relative to pairs nesting earlier in the season. These reproductive costs applied in the absence of ectoparasites and likely reflect other environmental costs of late nesting such as seasonal declines in food availability or a delayed start of fall migration. Despite the costs, the estimated fitness for perennial early-and-late nesters in the absence of ectoparasites was equivalent to that of birds that nested only early in the season. The collective disadvantages of late nesting likely constrain most cliff swallows to raising a single brood in the middle latitudes of North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brinkhof MWG, Cave AJ, Perdeck AC (1997) The seasonal decline in the first-year survival of juvenile coots: an experimental approach. J Anim Ecol 66:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR (1978) Double-broodedness in purple martins in Texas. Wilson Bull 90:239–247, 657

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1986) Ectoparasitism as a cost of coloniality in cliff swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). Ecology 67:1206–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1995) Cliff swallow (Hirundo pyrrhonota). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DC

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1996) Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1999) Fitness components associated with laying date in the cliff swallow. Condor 101:230–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (2004a) Empirical measurement of parasite transmission between groups in a colonial bird. Ecology 85:1619–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (2004b) Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival probability in a colonial bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:498–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB, Moore A, Komar N (2007) Bird movement predicts Buggy Creek virus infection in insect vectors. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 7:304–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB, Roche EA (2013) Spatial and temporal unpredictability of colony size in cliff swallows across 30 years. Ecol Monogr 83:511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownie C, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Robson DS (1985) Statistical inference from band recovery data―a handbook, 2nd edn. Research publication 156. United States Department of the Interior, Washington DC

  • Chapman BR, George JE (1991) The effects of ectoparasites on cliff swallow growth and survival. In: Loye JE, Zuk M (eds) Bird–parasite interactions: ecology. evolution and behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DH, Moore J (1997) Host-parasite evolution: general principles and avian models. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson A, Hinsley SA, Ferns PN, Bonser RHC, Eccleston L (2000) Rate of moult affects feather quality: a mechanism linking current reproductive effort to future survival. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2093–2098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Lope F, González G, Pérez JJ, Møller AP (1993) Increased detrimental effects of ectoparasites on their bird hosts during adverse environmental conditions. Oecologia 95:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Demong NJ (1975) Adaptive significance of synchronized breeding in a colonial bird: a new hypothesis. Science 188:1029–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geupel GR, DeSante DF (1990) Incidence and determinants of double brooding in wrentits. Condor 92:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (2000) The quality and the timing hypotheses evaluated using data on great reed warblers. Oikos 90:575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochachka W (1990) Seasonal decline in reproductive performance of song sparrows. Ecology 71:1279–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husby A, Kruuk LEB, Visser ME (2009) Decline in the frequency and benefits of multiple brooding in great tits as a consequence of a changing environment. Proc R Soc B 276:1845–1854

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imlay TJ, Crowley JF, Argue AM, Steiner JC, Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM (2010) Survival, dispersal and early migration movements of captive-bred juvenile eastern loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus migrans). Biol Conserv 143:2578–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs AC, Reader LL, Fair JM (2013) What determines the rates of double brooding in the western bluebird? Condor 115:386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp H (1970) The determinants of clutch size in birds: a review. Ardea 58:1–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapolla A, Buckley LJ (2005) Hatch date distributions of young-of-year haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus in the Gulf of Maine/Georges Bank region: implications for recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 290:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loye JE, Zuk M (eds) (1991) Bird-parasite interactions: ecology, evolution and behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Santema P, Bouwman KM, Brinkhuizen DM, Griffith SC, Langemore NE (2009) Seasonal decline in reproductive performance varies with colony size in the fairy martin, Petrochelidon ariel. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony NA, Vander Haegen WM, Walker BL, Krannitz PG (2001) Male incubation and multiple brooding in sagebrush Brewer’s sparrows. Wilson Bull 113:441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1990) Effects of parasitism by a haematophagous mite on reproduction in the barn swallow. Ecology 71:2345–2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Allander K, Dufva R (1990) Fitness effects of parasites on passerine birds: a review. In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Merino S, Brown CR, Robertson RJ (2001) Immune defense and host sociality: a comparative study of swallows and martins. Am Nat 158:136–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe AP, Hallinger KK, Brasso RL, Cristol DA (2008) Occurrence and implications of double brooding in a southern population of tree swallows. Condor 110:382–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy LR, Holmes RT (2005) To double-brood or not? Individual variation in the reproductive effort in black-throated blue warblers (Dendroica caerulescens). Auk 122:902–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson JA, Svensson E (1996) The cost of reproduction: a new link between current reproductive effort and future reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan V Jr (1978) The ecology and behavior of the prairie warbler Dendroica discolor. Ornithol Monogr 26. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DC

  • Perrins CM (1970) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons. Ibis 112:242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell LA (2007) Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. Condor 109:949–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price T, Kirkpatrick M, Arnold SJ (1988) Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240:798–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramstack JM, Murphy MT, Palmer MR (1998) Comparative reproductive biology of three species of swallows in a common environment. Wilson Bull 110:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Richner H, Heeb P (1995) Are clutch and brood size patterns in birds shaped by ectoparasites? Oikos 73:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche EA, Brown CR, Brown MB, Lear KM (2013) Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance. PLoS One 8:e58092

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Ludwig D, Schluter D (1994) Time, condition, and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am Nat 143:698–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ (1999) Seasonal variation in reproductive success and post-nuptial moult of blue tits in southern Europe: an experimental study. Oecologia 121:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson E (1997) Natural selection on avian breeding time: causality, fecundity-dependent, and fecundity-independent selection. Evolution 51:1276–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill LG, Prys-Jones RP, Dowsett RJ, Herroelen P, Johnsonn DN, Lawn MR, Norman SC, Pearson DJ, Tree AJ (1992) The biannual primary moult of willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus in Europe and Africa. Ibis 134:286–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega Rivera JH, Rappole JH, McShea WJ, Haas CA (1998) Wood thrush postfledging movements and habitat use in northern Virginia. Condor 100:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboven N, Verhulst S (1996) Seasonal variation in the incidence of double broods: the date hypothesis fits better than the quality hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 65:264–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Nilsson JA (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, van Balen JH, Tinbergen JM (1995) Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 76:2392–2403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop SL, Ydenberg RC (2003) Date and parental quality effects in the seasonal decline in reproductive performance of the tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor: interpreting results in light of potential experimental bias. Ibis 145:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver HB, Brown CR (2004) Brood parasitism and egg transfer in cave swallows (Petrochelidon fulva) and cliff swallows (P. pyrrhonota) in south Texas. Auk 121:1122–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:S120–S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Frank Axell, Alex Brazeal, Ananda Ellis, Emily Geary, Beate Hall, Bryce Hatfield, Jordan Herman, Allison Johnson, Kristen Lear, Nathan Miller, Catherine Page, Paul Smelcer, and Jessica Tipple for assistance with mark-recapture. Amy Moore managed the mark-recapture database. The Union Pacific Railroad provided access to land. The School of Biological Sciences at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln allowed us to use the Cedar Point Biological Station. We thank the National Science Foundation (DEB-0514824, DEB-1019423), the National Institutes of Health (AI057569), and the University of Tulsa’s Graduate School for financial support. This work was approved by the University of Tulsa’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol TU-0020 and was conducted in accordance with the laws of the United States of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles R. Brown.

Additional information

Communicated by Oliver P. Love.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, C.R., Roche, E.A. & O’Brien, V.A. Costs and benefits of late nesting in cliff swallows. Oecologia 177, 413–421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3095-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3095-3

Keywords

Navigation