Skip to main content
Log in

No time for candy: passionfruit (Passiflora edulis) plants down-regulate damage-induced extra floral nectar production in response to light signals of competition

  • Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant fitness is often defined by the combined effects of herbivory and competition, and plants must strike a delicate balance between their ability to capture limiting resources and defend against herbivore attack. Many plants use indirect defenses, such as volatile compounds and extrafloral nectaries (EFN), to attract canopy arthropods that are natural enemies of herbivorous organisms. While recent evidence suggests that upon perception of low red to far-red (R:FR) ratios, which signal the proximity of competitors, plants down-regulate resource allocation to direct chemical defenses, it is unknown if a similar phytochrome-mediated response occurs for indirect defenses. We evaluated the interactive effects of R:FR ratio and simulated herbivory on nectar production by EFNs of passionfruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa). The activity of petiolar EFNs dramatically increased in response to simulated herbivory and hormonal treatment with methyl jasmonate (MeJA). Low R:FR ratios, which induced a classic “shade-avoidance” repertoire of increased stem elongation in P. edulis, strongly suppressed the EFN response triggered by simulated herbivory or MeJA application. Strikingly, the EFN response to wounding and light quality was localized to the branches that received the treatments. In vines like P. edulis, a local response would allow the plants to precisely adjust their light harvesting and defense phenotypes to the local conditions encountered by individual branches when foraging for resources in patchy canopies. Consistent with the emerging paradigm that phytochrome regulation of jasmonate signaling is a central modulator of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, our results demonstrate that light quality is a strong regulator of indirect defenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Kearney E, Hastings A, Ramsey T (2012) Attenuation of the jasmonate burst, plant defensive traits, and resistance to specialist monarch caterpillars on shaded common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). J Chem Ecol 38:893–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apple JL, Feener DH Jr (2001) Ant visitation of extra floral nectaries of Passiflora: the effects of nectary attributes and ant behavior on patterns in facultative ant-plant mutualisms. Oecologia 127:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré CL (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 4:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré CL (2009) Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence. Plant Cell Environ 32:713–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré CL (2011) Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends Plant Sci 16:249–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Roush ML, Radosevich SR (1995) How plants find light in patchy canopies. A comparison between wild-type and phytochrome-B-deficient mutant plants of cucumber. Funct Ecol 9:859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré CL, Mazza CA, Austin AT, Pierik R (2012) Canopy light and plant health. Plant Physiol 160:145–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley BL (1977) Extra-floral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:407–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Cornelius ML (1989) Generalist caterpillar prey are more palatable than specialists for the generalist predator Iridomyrmex humilis. Oecologia 79:427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bixenmann RJ, Coley PD, Kursar TA (2011) Is extra floral nectar production induced by herbivores or ants in a tropical facultative ant-plant mutualism? Oecologia 165:417–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cagnola JI, Ploschuk E, Benech-Arnold T, Finlayson SA, Casal JJ (2012) Stem transcriptome reveals mechanisms to reduce the energetic cost of shade-avoidance responses in tomato. Plant Physiol 160:1110–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casal JJ (2012) Shade Avoidance. In: The Arabidopsis Book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, p e0157

  • Cerrudo I et al (2012) Low red/far-red ratios reduce arabidopsis resistance to Botrytis cinerea and jasmonate responses via a COI1-JAZ10-dependent, salicylic acid-independent mechanism. Plant Physiol 158:2042–2052

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain SA, Holland NJ (2009) Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. Ecology 90:2384–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius ML, Bernays EA (1995) The effect of plant chemistry on the acceptability of caterpillar prey to the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilils (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 8:579–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H, Mommer L, Hutchings MJ (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant, Cell Environ 32:704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit M et al (2013) Perception of low red: far-red ratio compromises both salicylic acid- and Jasmonic acid- dependent pathogen defences in Arabidopsis. Plant J 75:90–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deginani NB (2001) Las especies argentinas del género Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Darwiniana 39:43–129

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLucia EH, Nabity PD, Zavala JA, Berenbaum MR (2012) Climate change: resetting plant-insect interactions. Plant Physiol 160:1677–1685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey DB (2001) Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante-Pérez M et al (2012) Poplar extra floral nectaries: two types, two strategies of indirect defenses against herbivores. Plant Physiol 159:1176–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2010) Plastic defence expression in plants. Evol Ecol 24:555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2011) Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends Plant Sci 16:191–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Linsenmair KE (2001) Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1083–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Held M, Baldwin IT (2005) Soil degradation slows growth and inhibits jasmonate-induced resistance in Artemisia vulgaris. Ecol Appl 15:1689–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izaguirre MM, Scopel AL, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2003) Convergent responses to stress. Solar ultraviolet-B radiation and Manduca sexta herbivory elicit overlapping transcriptional responses in field-grown plants of Nicotiana longiflora. Plant Physiol 132:1755–1767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Biondini M, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2006) Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7170–7174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin I (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kazan K, Manners JM (2011) The interplay between light and jasmonate signalling during defence and development. J Exp Bot 62:4087–4100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kegge W, Pierik R (2010) Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition. Trends Plant Sci 15:126–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller MM, Jaillais Y, Pedmale UV, Moreno JE, Chory J, Ballaré CL (2011) Crypto chrome 1 and phytochrome B control shade-avoidance responses in Arabidopsis via partially-independent hormonal cascades. Plant J 67:195–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kigathi RN, Weisser WW, Veit D, Gershenzon J, Unsicker SB (2013) Plants suppress their emission of volatiles when growing with conspecifics. J Chem Ecol 39:537–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1974) Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extra floral nectaries and weedy ants in California. Am J Bot 66:1016–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire R, Agrawal AA (2005) Trade-offs between the shade-avoidance response and plant resistance to herbivores? Tests with mutant Cucumis sativus. Funct Ecol 19:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1983) Ants, extra floral nectaries and herbivory on the Passion vine, Passiflora incarnata. Am Midl Nat 110:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JE, Tao Y, Chory J, Ballaré CL (2009) Ecological modulation of plant defense via phytochrome control of jasmonate sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4935–4940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novoplansky A (2009) Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. Plant, Cell Environ 32:726–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierik R, Mommer L, Voesenek LACJ (2013) Molecular mechanisms of plant competition: neighbour detection and response strategies. Funct Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12010

  • Radhika V, Kost C, Mithöfer A, Boland W (2010) Regulation of extrafloral nectar secretion by jasmonates in lima bean is light dependent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17228–17233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray TS (1992) Foraging behaviour in tropical herbaceous climbers (Araceae). J Ecol 80:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR, Paul ND (2006) Seduced by the dark side: integrating molecular and ecological perspectives on the influence of light on plant defence against pests and pathogens. New Phytol 170:677–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruberti I, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Possenti M, Carabelli M, Morelli G (2012) Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: the shade avoidance response. Biotechnol Adv 30:1047–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley J (1986) Ant constancy at Passiflora extra floral nectaries: effects on caterpillar survival. Ecology 67:516–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1982) The role of the extra floral nectaries of Catalpa speciosa in limiting herbivory and increasing fruit production. Ecology 63:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y et al (2008) Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell 133:164–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ, Paiva MR, Cammell ME (1999) Natural biological control of the pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) by the Argentine ant Linepithema humile (Mayr) in Portugal. Agric For Entomol 1:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu FF, Chen J (2010) Competition hierarchy and plant defense in a guild of ants on tropical Passiflora. Insectes Soc 57:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by CONICET, ANPCyT and UBACyT. We thank Amy Austin for thoughtful comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos L. Ballaré.

Additional information

Communicated by Russell K Monson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Izaguirre, M.M., Mazza, C.A., Astigueta, M.S. et al. No time for candy: passionfruit (Passiflora edulis) plants down-regulate damage-induced extra floral nectar production in response to light signals of competition. Oecologia 173, 213–221 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2721-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2721-9

Keywords

Navigation