Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf litter quality drives litter mixing effects through complementary resource use among detritivores

  • Ecosystem Ecology - Original Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To comprehend the potential consequences of biodiversity loss on the leaf litter decomposition process, a better understanding of its underlying mechanisms is necessary. Here, we hypothesize that positive litter mixture effects occur via complementary resource use, when litter species complement each other in terms of resource quality for detritivores. To investigate this, monocultures and mixtures of two leaf litter species varying in quality were allowed to decompose with and without a single macro-detritivore species (the terrestrial woodlice Oniscus asellus). Resource quality of the mixture was assessed by the mean concentration, the dissimilarity in absolute and relative concentrations, and the covariance between nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) supply. Our results clearly show that litter mixing effects were driven by differences in their resource quality for detritivores. In particular, complementary supply of N and P was a major driver of litter mixing effects. Interestingly, litter mixing effects caused by the addition of woodlice were predominantly driven by N dissimilarity, whereas in their absence, increased P concentration was the main driver of litter mixing effects. These results show that ultimately, litter diversity effects on decomposition may be driven by complementary resource use of the whole decomposer community (i.e., microbes and macro-detritivores).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW (1997) High productivity in grassland ecosystems: affected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM (1988) Spatiotemporal effects of invertebrates on soil processes. Biol Fertil Soils 6:216–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Bright KL, Gonzalez N, Angel J (1994) Dietary mixing in a generalist herbivore: test of two hypotheses. Ecology 75:1997–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo HA, Abe TA, Prescott CE, Holl FB, Chanway CP (2000) Influence of millipedes on litter decomposition, N mineralization and microbial communities in a coastal forest in British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 30:817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jouseau C (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman K, Whittaker JB, Heal OW (1988) Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 24:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira TD, Hättenschwiler S, Handa IT (2010) Snail and millipede complementarity in decomposing Mediterranean forest leaf litter mixtures. Funct Ecol 24:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Ma HHT, Lam PKS (1990) Differential palatability of leaf litter to four sympatric isopods in a Hong Kong forest. Oecologia 84:398–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie SE, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003) Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith J (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 12:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicolinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Bretscher D (2001) Isopod effects on decomposition of litter produced under elevated CO2, N deposition and different soil types. Glob Change Biol 7:565–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Jørgensen HB (2010) Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005a) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Gasser P, Field CB (2005b) Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1519–1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Beale AJ, Minns A, Otway SJ, Lawton JH (2000) Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition: effects through litter quality and microenvironment. Oikos 90:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, van Hal JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA (2004) Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madritch MD, Cardinale BJ (2007) Impacts of tree species diversity on litter decomposition in northern temperate forests of Wisconsin, USA: a multi-site experiment along a latitudinal gradient. Plant Soil 292:147–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun M, Scheu S (1996) Changes in microbial biomass, respiration and nutrient status of Beech (Fagus sylvatica) leaf litter processed by millipedes (Glomeris marginata). Oecologia 107:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier CL, Bowman WD (2008) Phenolic-rich leaf carbon fractions differentially influence microbial respiration and plant growth. Oecologia 158:95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Novozamsky I, Houba VJG, van Eck R, van Vark W (1983) A novel digestion technique for multi-element plant analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 14:239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien R (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41:673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Blundo CM, Gurvich DE, Díaz S, Cuevas E (2008) More than the sum of its parts? Assessing litter heterogeneity effects on decomposition of litter mixtures through leaf chemistry. Plant Soil 303:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamanca EF, Kaneko N, Katagiri S (1998) Effects of leaf litter mixtures on the decomposition of Quercus serrata and Pinus densiflora using field and laboratory microcosm methods. Ecol Eng 10:53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schädler M, Brandl R (2005) Do invertebrate decomposers affect the disappearance rate of leaf litter mixtures? Soil Biol Biochem 37:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Hattenschwiler S (2007) Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1428–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swan CM, Palmer MA (2006) Preferential feeding by an aquatic consumer mediates non-additive decomposition of speciose leaf litter. Oecologia 149:107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Boddy L (1984) Animal–microbial interactions in wood decomposition. In: Anderson JM, Rayner ADM, Walton DWH (eds) Invertebrate–microbial interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 89–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot JM, Yelle DJ, Nowick J, Treseder KK (2011) Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry. Biogeochemistry 108:279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Distinguishing the effects of species diversity and species composition. Oikos 80:185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiunov AV (2009) Particle size alters litter diversity effects on decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 41:176–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser S (1986) The role of the soil invertebrates in determining the composition of soil microbial communities. In: Fitter AH (ed) Ecological interactions in the soil environment. Plants, microbes and animals. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 297–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos VCA, van Ruijven J, Berg MP, Peeters ETHM, Berendse F (2011) Macro-detritivore identity drives leaf litter diversity effects. Oikos 120:1092–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall DH, Bradford MA, St. John MG, Trofymow JA, Behan-Pelletier V, Bignell DE, Dangerfield JM, Parton WJ, Rusek J, Voigt W, Wolters V, Gardel HZ, Ayuke FO, Bashford R, Beljakova OI, Bohlen PJ, Brauman A, Flemming S, Henschel JR, Johnson DL, Jones TH, Kovarova M, Kranabetter JM, Kutny LES, Lin K, Maryati M, Masse D, Pokarzhevskii A, Rahman H, Sabará Millor G, Salamon J, Swift MJ, Varela A, Vasconcelos HL, White DON, Zou X (2008) Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Glob Change Biol 14:661–2677

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1997) Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J Anim Ecol 75:1182–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Russell JD (1987) On the nature of the calcium carbonate in the exoskeleton of woodlouse Oniscus asellus L. (Isopoda, Oniscidea). Crustaceana 53:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer M (2002) Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness? Soil Biol Biochem 34:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer M, Topp W (2000) Species-specific utilization of food sources by sympatric woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea). J Anim Ecol 69:1071–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is an individual subproject contributing to the “BioCycle” collaborative research project funded by the EuroCORES programme EuroDIVERSITY of the European Science Foundation (ESF) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). “BioCycle” is endorsed by DIVERSITAS as contributing towards their current scientific research priorities in biodiversity science. We would like to thank Frans Möller and Jan van Walsem for their practical help during the experiment and the Alterra Freshwater ecology group for the use of their climate chamber.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronique C. A. Vos.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Madritch.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material S1 (PDF 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vos, V.C.A., van Ruijven, J., Berg, M.P. et al. Leaf litter quality drives litter mixing effects through complementary resource use among detritivores. Oecologia 173, 269–280 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2588-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2588-1

Keywords

Navigation