Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From selection to complementarity: the shift along the abiotic stress gradient in a controlled biodiversity experiment

  • Community ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of principal mechanisms (selection and complementarity) of biodiversity on ecosystem functionality have been well studied. However, it remains unknown how environmental conditions affect the relative strength of these two mechanisms. To answer this question, a controlled pot experiment was conducted in which species diversity was manipulated in low (natural soil) and high stress (mine tailing) plots, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the principal mechanism underlying the increasing biomass shifts from the selection to complementarity with increasing abiotic stress. The shift occurs because species interactions varied with increasing abiotic stress. Competition prevails in low stress plots, while facilitation dominates in high stress plots. In low stress plots, the monoculture biomass of a specific species is a good indicator of the competitive ability of that species in the mixture, and the dominant species significantly affects the plot biomass. In high stress plots, the tolerance indexes of all individual species increase with the manipulated species richness, providing clear evidence for the increasing role of facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertness MD, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Gough L, Shumway SW (1992) Salt tolerances and the distribution of fugitive salt marsh plants. Ecology 73:1842–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Callaghan TV (1998) The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81:196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu CJ, Maestre FT, Xiao S, Weiner J, Wang YS, Duan ZH, Wang G (2008) Balance between facilitation and resource competition determines biomass–density relationships in plant populations. Ecol Lett 11:1189–1197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corcket E, Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2003) The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species, as affected by environmental manipulations in the field. Ecoscience 10:186–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes JS (2001) Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying diversity. Oikos 94:468–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME (2001) Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 411:687–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M (2007) From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc R Soc B 274:871–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridley JD (2001) The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos 93:514–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridley JD (2002) Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities. Oecologia 132:271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1999) Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 80:2064–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Yanga XE, Stoffellab PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. Rev J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:125–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hector A (2002) Biodiversity and the functioning of grassland ecosystems: multi-site comparisons. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala S, Tillman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Bazeley-White E, Loreau M, Otway S, Schmid B (2002) Overyielding in grassland communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments. Ecol Lett 5:502–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Dukes JS (2004) Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecol Lett 7:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1998) Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol Monogr 68:121–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 108:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA, McBride AC (2002) Evaluating the relative strengths of biotic versus abiotic controls on ecosystem processes. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin MP (2000) No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser J (2000) Rift over biodiversity divides ecologists. Science 289:1282–1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, Brooker RW, Choler P, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2005) Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: a global study. Ecology 86:1395–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyval C, Berthelin J (1993) Rhizodeposition and net release of soluble organic compounds by pine and beech seedlings inoculated with rhizobacteria and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Biol Fertil Soils 15:259–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2005) Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86:1611–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Kikvidze Z, Callaway RM (2004) The value of stress and limitation in an imperfect world: a reply to Körner. J Veg Sci 15:577–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Valladares F, Reynolds JF (2005) Is the change of plant–plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments. J Ecol 93:748–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H, Romheld V (1983) In vivo measurement of root-induced pH changes at the soil–root interface: effect of plant species and nitrogen source. Plant Physiol 111:241–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak DF (2001) Physical stress and diversity–productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. PNAS 98:6704–6708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S (2000) Reply to Wardle et al. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis chemical and microbiological properties. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SCER, Seling LTH, Bertness MD (2003) Geographic variation in positive and negative interactions among salt marsh plants. Ecology 84:1527–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfisterer AB, Joshi J, Schmid B, Fischer M (2004) Rapid decay of diversity–productivity relationships after invasion in experimental plant communities. Basic Appl Ecol 5:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špaèková I, Lepš J (2001) Procedure for separating the selection effect from other effects in diversity–productivity relationship. Ecol Lett 4:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Bazeley-White E (2005) Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:37–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, Goldberg D, Hartman KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2003) Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes. Ecol Lett 6:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2006) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals in mine soils: influence of mine soil characteristics. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:582–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhang CB, Ke SS, Qian BY (2011) Different spontaneous plant communities in Sanmen Pb/Zn mine tailing and their effects on mine tailing physico-chemical properties. Environ Earth Sci 62:779–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1999) Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Huston MA, Grime JP, Berendse F, Garnier E, SetaÈlaÈ H (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: an issue in ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:235–239

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to C. B. Zhang for help with harvesting, and Y. Ge provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was completed within the experimental center of Taizhou University. These experiments comply with the current laws of the China. This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project 31000256) and by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Y5100016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei H. Li.

Additional information

Communicated by Scott Collins.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1 (DOC 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Zhang, C.B., Chen, T. et al. From selection to complementarity: the shift along the abiotic stress gradient in a controlled biodiversity experiment. Oecologia 171, 227–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2400-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2400-2

Keywords

Navigation