Abstract
The effects of principal mechanisms (selection and complementarity) of biodiversity on ecosystem functionality have been well studied. However, it remains unknown how environmental conditions affect the relative strength of these two mechanisms. To answer this question, a controlled pot experiment was conducted in which species diversity was manipulated in low (natural soil) and high stress (mine tailing) plots, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the principal mechanism underlying the increasing biomass shifts from the selection to complementarity with increasing abiotic stress. The shift occurs because species interactions varied with increasing abiotic stress. Competition prevails in low stress plots, while facilitation dominates in high stress plots. In low stress plots, the monoculture biomass of a specific species is a good indicator of the competitive ability of that species in the mixture, and the dominant species significantly affects the plot biomass. In high stress plots, the tolerance indexes of all individual species increase with the manipulated species richness, providing clear evidence for the increasing role of facilitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertness MD, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193
Bertness MD, Gough L, Shumway SW (1992) Salt tolerances and the distribution of fugitive salt marsh plants. Ecology 73:1842–1851
Brooker RW, Callaghan TV (1998) The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81:196–207
Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht
Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848
Chu CJ, Maestre FT, Xiao S, Weiner J, Wang YS, Duan ZH, Wang G (2008) Balance between facilitation and resource competition determines biomass–density relationships in plant populations. Ecol Lett 11:1189–1197
Corcket E, Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2003) The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species, as affected by environmental manipulations in the field. Ecoscience 10:186–194
Dukes JS (2001) Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying diversity. Oikos 94:468–480
Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME (2001) Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 411:687–689
Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M (2007) From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc R Soc B 274:871–876
Fridley JD (2001) The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos 93:514–526
Fridley JD (2002) Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities. Oecologia 132:271–277
Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1999) Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 80:2064–2073
He ZL, Yanga XE, Stoffellab PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. Rev J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:125–140
Hector A (2002) Biodiversity and the functioning of grassland ecosystems: multi-site comparisons. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala S, Tillman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 71–95
Hector A, Bazeley-White E, Loreau M, Otway S, Schmid B (2002) Overyielding in grassland communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments. Ecol Lett 5:502–511
Hooper DU, Dukes JS (2004) Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecol Lett 7:95–105
Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1998) Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol Monogr 68:121–149
Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35
Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 108:449–460
Huston MA, McBride AC (2002) Evaluating the relative strengths of biotic versus abiotic controls on ecosystem processes. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 47–60
Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin MP (2000) No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255a
Kaiser J (2000) Rift over biodiversity divides ecologists. Science 289:1282–1283
Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, Brooker RW, Choler P, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2005) Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: a global study. Ecology 86:1395–1400
Leyval C, Berthelin J (1993) Rhizodeposition and net release of soluble organic compounds by pine and beech seedlings inoculated with rhizobacteria and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Biol Fertil Soils 15:259–267
Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2005) Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86:1611–1618
Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636
Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17
Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76
Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Kikvidze Z, Callaway RM (2004) The value of stress and limitation in an imperfect world: a reply to Körner. J Veg Sci 15:577–580
Maestre FT, Valladares F, Reynolds JF (2005) Is the change of plant–plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments. J Ecol 93:748–757
Marschner H, Romheld V (1983) In vivo measurement of root-induced pH changes at the soil–root interface: effect of plant species and nitrogen source. Plant Physiol 111:241–251
Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak DF (2001) Physical stress and diversity–productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. PNAS 98:6704–6708
Naeem S (2000) Reply to Wardle et al. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:241–246
Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis chemical and microbiological properties. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI
Pennings SCER, Seling LTH, Bertness MD (2003) Geographic variation in positive and negative interactions among salt marsh plants. Ecology 84:1527–1538
Pfisterer AB, Joshi J, Schmid B, Fischer M (2004) Rapid decay of diversity–productivity relationships after invasion in experimental plant communities. Basic Appl Ecol 5:5–14
Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305
Špaèková I, Lepš J (2001) Procedure for separating the selection effect from other effects in diversity–productivity relationship. Ecol Lett 4:585–594
Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Bazeley-White E (2005) Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:37–63
Suding KN, Goldberg D, Hartman KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84:1–16
Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2003) Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes. Ecol Lett 6:170–175
Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2006) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals in mine soils: influence of mine soil characteristics. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:582–592
Wang J, Zhang CB, Ke SS, Qian BY (2011) Different spontaneous plant communities in Sanmen Pb/Zn mine tailing and their effects on mine tailing physico-chemical properties. Environ Earth Sci 62:779–786
Wardle DA (1999) Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403–407
Wardle DA, Huston MA, Grime JP, Berendse F, Garnier E, SetaÈlaÈ H (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: an issue in ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:235–239
Acknowledgments
Thanks to C. B. Zhang for help with harvesting, and Y. Ge provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was completed within the experimental center of Taizhou University. These experiments comply with the current laws of the China. This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project 31000256) and by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Y5100016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Scott Collins.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Zhang, C.B., Chen, T. et al. From selection to complementarity: the shift along the abiotic stress gradient in a controlled biodiversity experiment. Oecologia 171, 227–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2400-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2400-2