Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual quality, survival variation and patterns of phenotypic selection on body condition and timing of nesting in birds

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Questions about individual variation in “quality” and fitness are of great interest to evolutionary and population ecologists. Such variation can be investigated using either a random effects approach or an approach that relies on identifying observable traits that are themselves correlated with fitness components. We used the latter approach with data from 1,925 individual females of three species of ducks (tufted duck, Aythya fuligula; common pochard, Aythya ferina; northern shoveler, Anas clypeata) sampled on their breeding grounds at Engure Marsh, Latvia, for over 15 years. Based on associations with reproductive output, we selected two traits, one morphological (relative body condition) and one behavioral (relative time of nesting), that can be used to characterize individual females over their lifetimes. We then asked whether these traits were related to annual survival probabilities of nesting females. We hypothesized quadratic, rather than monotonic, relationships based loosely on ideas about the likely action of stabilizing selection on these two traits. Parameters of these relationships were estimated directly using ultrastructural models embedded within capture-recapture-band-recovery models. Results provided evidence that both traits were related to survival in the hypothesized manner. For all three species, females that tended to nest earlier than the norm exhibited the highest survival rates, but very early nesters experienced reduced survival and late nesters showed even lower survival. For shovelers, females in average body condition showed the highest survival, with lower survival rates exhibited by both heavy and light birds. For common pochard and tufted duck, the highest survival rates were associated with birds of slightly above-average condition, with somewhat lower survival for very heavy birds and much lower survival for birds in relatively poor condition. Based on results from this study and previous work on reproduction, we conclude that nest initiation date and body condition covary with both reproductive and survival components of fitness. These associations lead to a positive covariance of these two fitness components within individuals and to the conclusion that these two traits are indeed correlates of individual quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MG, Lindberg MS, Emery RB (2001) Probability of survival and breeding for juvenile female Canvasbacks. J Wildl Manage 65:385–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankney CD, Afton AD, Alisauskas RT (1991) The role of nutrient reserves in limiting waterfowl reproduction. Condor 93:1029–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75:385–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Clark RG (2004) Correlates of lifetime reproductive success in three species of European ducks. Oecologia 140:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Reders V, Mednis A, Baumanis J (1983) Automatic drop-door traps for ducks. J Wildl Manage 47:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Mednis A, Bauga I, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1996) Age-specific survival and philopatry in three species of European ducks: a long-term study. Condor 98:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Mednis A, Clark RG (1997) Effect of incubation body mass on reproductive success and survival of three European diving ducks: a test of the nutrient limitation hypothesis. Condor 99:916–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Clark RG, Mednis A (2002a) Patterns of reproductive effort and success in birds: path analyses of long-term data from European ducks. J Anim Ecol 71:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Mednis A (2002b) Sources of variation in survival and breeding site fidelity in three species of European ducks. J Anim Ecol 71:438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Nichols JD, Lindberg MS, Hines JE, Mednis A (2003) Factors affecting breeding dispersal of European ducks on Engure Marsh, Latvia. J Anim Ecol 72:292–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhof MWG, Cave AJ, Daan S, Perdeck AC (2002) Timing of current reproduction directly affects future reproductive output in European Coots. Evolution 56:400–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP (1993) A theory for combined analysis of ring recovery and recapture data. In: Lebreton J-D, North PM (eds) Marked individuals in the study of bird population. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cam E, Link WA, Cooch EG, Monnat J-Y, Danchin E (2002) Individual variation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am Nat 159:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (1986) An uncertainty principle in demography and the unisex issue. Am Stat 40:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ, Costanzo GR, Stotts DB (1989) Winter survival of female American black ducks on the Atlantic Coast. J Wildl Manage 53:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooch EG (2002) Fledging size and survival in snow geese: timing is everything (or is it?). J Appl Stat 29:143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooch EG, White GW (2004) Using MARK: a gentle introduction, 3rd edn. Available at http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/

  • Cooch EG, Cam E, Link WA (2002) Occam’s revenge: levels of analysis in evolutionary ecology—where to next? J Appl Stat 29:19–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke F, Findlay CS, Rockwell RF (1984) Recruitment and the timing of reproduction in Lesser Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens). Auk 101:451–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daan S, Dijkstra C, Tinbergen JM (1990) Family planning in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): the ultimate control of covariation of laying date and clutch size. Behaviour 114:83–116

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Gross LJ (1992) Individual-based models and approaches in ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour KW, Ankney CD, Weatherhead PJ (1993) Condition and vulnerability to hunting among mallards staging at Lake St. Clair, Ontario. J Wildl Manage 57:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferriere R, Le Gaillard J-F (2001) Invasion fitness and adaptive dynamics in spatial population models. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 57–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, CM, Richards MH, Cooke F, Rockwell RF (1992) Long-term changes in the survival of lesser snow geese. Ecology 73:1346–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosler AG, Greenwood JDJ, Perrins C (1995) Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377:621–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haramis GM, Nichols JD, Pollock KH, Hines JE (1986) The relationship between body mass and survival of wintering canvasbacks. Auk 103:506–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp GR, Blohm RJ, Reynolds RE, Hines JE, Nichols JD (1986) Physiological condition of autumn-banded mallards and its relationship to hunting vulnerability. J Wildl Manage 50:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MRJ, Alisauskas RT, Ankney CD, Leafloor JO (2003) Influence of body size and condition on harvest and survival of juvenile Canada geese. J Wildl Manage 67:530–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH, Nichols JD, Schwartz MD (1992) Population dynamics of breeding waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 446–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula K, Orell M, Lahti K (2002) Plastic daily fattening routines in willow tits. J Anim Ecol 71:816–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langston NE, Freeman S, Rohwer S, Gori D (1990) The evolution of female body size in Red-winged Blackbirds: the effects of timing of breeding, social competition, and reproductive energetics. Evolution 44:1764–1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkovitch LP (1965) The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie PH (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:183–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Link W, Cooch E, Cam E (2002) Model-based individual fitness. J Appl Stat 29:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnicki A (1988) Population ecology of individuals. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton KG, Stallard E, Vaupel JW (1981) Methods for comparing the mortality experience of heterogeneous populations. Demography 18:389–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz JAJ, Nisbet RM, Geritz SAH (1992) How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol Evol 7:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (1986) On being the right size: natural selection and body size in the Herring Gull. Evolution 40:1096–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1989) Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD (2002) Discussion comments on “Occam’s shadow levels of analysis in evolutionary ecology: where to next?” by Cooch, Cam and Link. J Appl Stat 29:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Hines JE, Blums P (1997) Tests for senescent decline in annual survival probabilities of common pochards, Aythya ferina. Ecology 78:1009–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J-A (1999) Fitness consequences of timing of reproduction. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 22:234–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen M, Black JM (1989) Factors affecting the survival of barnacle geese on migration from the breeding grounds. J Anim Ecol 58:603–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RM, Afton AD (1999) Direct recovery rates of lesser scaup banded in Northwest Minnesota: sources of heterogeneity. J Wildl Manage 63:389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Winterstein SR, Conroy MJ (1989) Estimation and analysis of survival distributions for radio-tagged animals. Biometrics 45:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke KJ, Stone TL, Owen RB Jr (1982) Seasonal carcass composition and energy balance of female black ducks in Maine. Condor 84:420–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer FC (1992) The evolution of reproductive patterns in waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 486–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer FC, Heusmann HW (1991) Effects of brood size and age on survival of female Wood Ducks. Condor 93:817–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotella JJ, Clark RG, Afton AD (2003) Survival of female lesser scaup: effect of body size, age, and reproductive effort. Condor 105:336–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz JA (1993) Survival and pre-fledging body mass in juvenile emperor geese. Condor 95:222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger JS, Flint PL, Lindberg MS (1995) Environmental influence on life-history traits: growth, survival, and fecundity in black brant (Branta bernicla). Ecology 76:2404–2414

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1951) The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 13:238–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery SM, Alisauskas RT (2002) Use of the Barker model in an experiment examining covariate effects on first-year survival in Ross’s geese (Chen rossii): a case study. J Appl Stat 29:497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life-histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Viksne J (2000) Changes of nesting bird fauna at the Engure Ramsar Site, Latvia, during the last 50 years. Proc Latvian Acad Sci Sect B 54:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Clark RG (1994) Natural selection and sexual size dimorphism in Red-winged Blackbirds. Evolution 48:1071–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 [Suppl]:S120–S139

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2001) Advanced features of program MARK. In: Field R, Warren RJ, Okarma H, Sievert PR (eds) Wildlife, land, and people: priorities for the 21st century. Proceedings of the international wildlife conference. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 368–377

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank many people who assisted with field work or contributed to the maintenance of the database, in particular, J. Baltvilks (deceased), I. Bauga, A. Celmins, A. Graubica, G. Graubics, M. Janaus, J. Kats, M. Kazubierne, J. Kazubiernis, P. Leja, G. Lejins (deceased), J. Lipsbergs, H. Mihelsons (deceased), A. Petrins, V. Pilats, V. Reders, J. Viksne, and A. Stipniece. D. Spals and V. Klimpins provided technical support throughout the study. J.J. Rotella, R.G. Clark, C. Vleck, and an anonymous referee provided many useful comments on the final version of the manuscript. Funding for the field work and data computerization of this long-term research project was provided by the Institute of Biology, University of Latvia (formerly Latvian Academy of Sciences). P. Blums was supported by a grant (DEB–0108373) from the National Science Foundation, USA, during data analysis and manuscript preparation. This research was, in part, supported by the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Peter Blums

    Present address: Gaylord Memorial Laboratory, University of Missouri, Route 1, Box 185, Puxico, MO, 63960, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Miera 3, LV-2169, Salaspils, Latvia

    Peter Blums & Aivars Mednis

  2. USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA

    James D Nichols & James E. Hines

  3. Department of Biology and Wildlife, and Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA

    Mark S. Lindberg

Authors
  1. Peter Blums
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James E. Hines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark S. Lindberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aivars Mednis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Blums.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blums, P., Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E. et al. Individual quality, survival variation and patterns of phenotypic selection on body condition and timing of nesting in birds. Oecologia 143, 365–376 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1794-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1794-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation