Skip to main content
Log in

Ungulate community structure and ecological processes: body size, hoof area and trampling in African savannas

  • Ecosystems Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide range of bioenergetic, production, life history and ecological traits scale with body size in vertebrates. However, the consequences of differences in community body-size structure for ecological processes have not been explored. We studied the scaling relationships between body mass, shoulder height, hoof area, stride length and daily ranging distance in African ungulates ranging in size from the 5 kg dik-dik to the 5,000 kg African elephant, and the implications of these relationships on the area trampled by single and multispecies herbivore communities of differing structure. Hoof area, shoulder height and stride length were strongly correlated with body mass (Pearson's r >0.98, 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). Hoof area scaled linearly to body mass with a slope of unity, implying that the pressures exerted on the ground per unit area by a small antelope and an elephant are identical. Shoulder height and stride length scaled to body mass with similar slopes of 0.32 and 0.26, respectively; larger herbivores have relatively shorter legs and take relatively shorter steps than small herbivores, and so trample a greater area of ground per unit distance travelled. We compared several real and hypothetical single- and multi-species ungulate communities using exponents of between 0.1 and 0.5 for the body mass to daily ranging distance relationship and found that the estimated area trampled was greater in communities dominated by larger animals. The impacts of large herbivores are not limited to trampling. Questions about the ecological implications of community body-size structure for such variables as foraging and food intake, dung quality and deposition rates, methane production, and daily travelling distances remain clear research priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Magid AH, Schuman GE, Hart RH (1987a) Soil bulk density and water infiltration as affected by grazing systems. J Range Manage 40:307–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-Magid AH, Trlica MJ, Hart RH (1987b) Soil and vegetation responses to simulated trampling. J Range Manage 40:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann SA (1987) The impact of locomotor energetics on mammalian foraging. J Zool 211:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley WG (2001) SIMFIT. Reference manual, ver 5.3. http://www.simfit.man.ac.uk

  • Bennett MB (1999) Foot areas, ground reaction forces and pressure beneath the feet of kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea). J Zool 247:365–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, West GB (eds) (2000) Scaling in biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Calder WA III (1984) Size, function and life history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Coe MJ, Cumming DH, Phillipson J (1976) Biomass and production of large African herbivores in relation to rainfall and primary production. Oecologia 22:341–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson RFH, Goodman PS (1982) An assessment of range condition and large herbivore carrying capacity of the Pilanesburg Game Reserve, with guidelines and recommendations for management. Inkwe 1:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DHM (1982) The influence of large herbivores on savanna structure in Africa. In: Huntley BJ, Walker BH (eds) Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 217–245

  • Cumming DHM (1999) Study on the development of transboundary natural resource management areas in southern Africa—environmental context: natural resources, land use, and conservation. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DHM, Fenton MB, Rautenbach IL, Taylor RD, Cumming GS, Cumming MS, Dunlop JM, Ford GA, Hovorka MD, Johnston DS, Kalcounis M, Mahlangu Z, Portfors CVR (1997) Elephants, woodlands and biodiversity in Southern Africa. S Afr J Sci 93:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadkhah M, Gifford GF (1980) Influence of vegetation, rock cover, and trampling on infiltration rates and sediment production. Water Resour Bull 16:979–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J (1981) Home range, home range overlap, and species energy use among herbivorous mammals. Biol J Linn Soc 15:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert RE, Peterson FF, Meurisse MS, Stephens JL (1986) Effects of soil-surface morphology on emergence and survival of seedlings in big sagebrush communities. J Range Manage 39:414–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Duncan P (1994) On the carrying capacity for large ungulates of African savanna ecosystems. Proc R Soc London Ser B 256:77–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland T Jr (1983) Scaling the ecological cost of transport to body mass in terrestrial mammals. Am Nat 121:571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford GF, Springer EP (1980) A selected annotated bibliography on grazing hydrology. Utah Agric Exp Stn Res Rep 50:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur P (1990) Bivariate allometry: interval estimation of the slopes of the ordinary and standardized normal major axes and structural relationships. J Theor Biol 144:257–285

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera M (1989) Analysing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws RM (1970) Elephants as agents of habitat and landscape change in East Africa. Oikos 21:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1994) What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71:367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull HW (1959) Soil compaction on forest and rangeland. US Dep Agric Misc Publ 768:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentis MT (1981) The animal as a factor in pasture and veld management. In: Tainton NM (ed) Veld and pasture management in South Africa. Shuter and Shooter, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, pp 287–381

  • Owen-Smith RN (1988) Megaherbivores. The influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Owen-Smith RN, Cumming DHM (1993) Comparative foraging strategies of grazing ungulates in African savanna grasslands. Proceedings XVII International Grassland Congress, vol 1. New Zealand Grassland Association, Palmerston North, New Zealand, pp 691–698

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Plumptre AJ (1993) The effects of trampling damage by herbivores on the vegetation of the Parc National des Volcans, Rwanda. Afr J Ecol 32:115–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero JW (1986) Methodological aspects of scaling in biology. J Theor Biol 118:259–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner JD, Smithers RHN (1990) The mammals of the Southern African subregion. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

  • Smithers RHN (1983) The mammals of the Southern African subregion. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Ssemakula J (1983) A comparative study of hoof pressures of wild and domestic ungulates. Afr J Ecol 21:325–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen PJ, Bothma J du P (1990) Daily movements of desert-dwelling elephants in the northern Namib Desert. S Afr J Wildl Res 20:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren SD, Thurow TL, Blackburn WH, Garza NE (1986) The influence of livestock trampling under intensive rotation grazing on soil hydrologic characteristics. J Range Manage 39:491–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Western D (1979) Size, life history and ecology in mammals. Afr J Ecol 17:185–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.H.M.C. was supported for part of this work by the WWF Multispecies Animal Productions Systems Project and G.S.C. was supported by a David H. Smith Fellowship at the Centre for Limnology at the University of Wisconsin. We thank Norman Owen-Smith and Anthony Starfield for their helpful, critical comments on an earlier version of this paper and Bob Burn, Erica Keogh and Susan Richardson-Kageler for advice on statistical matters. Astrid Huelin kindly provided body measurements from three adult female elephant of known weights. We also thank two anonymous referees and the Editor, Dr. Roland Brandl, for their contribution to improving this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. M. Cumming.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Morphometric data for 44 African ungulates. Common names follow Skinner and Smithers (1990)

Species

Adult female mass (kg)

Unit mass (kg)

Metabolic mass (UM^0.75)

Shoulder height (cm)

Mean hoof area (cm2)

Stride length (cm)

Elephanta

2,275

1,725

267.7

240

997.5

256

White rhino

1,500

1,500

241.0

170

607.2

210

Hippo

1,320

1,000

177.8

140

487.8

Black rhino

850

816

152.7

160

278.4

148

Giraffe

825

750

143.3

274

189.6

247

Buffalo

450

450

97.7

140

139.7

150

Eland

450

340

79.2

160

71.9

145

Cape mountain zebra

234

124

57.5

Roan

250

220

57.1

140

62.9

Burchell's zebra

302

200

53.2

134

97.5

139

Sable

200

185

50.2

135

51.9

145

Cattleb

306

180

49.1

125

85.0

Blue Wildebeest

180

165

46.0

135

31.4

157

Waterbuck

175

160

45.0

130

26.1

135

Gemsbok

225

150

42.9

120

39.4

Lichtenstein's Hartebeest

166

137

40.0

124

23.6

Kudu

160

135

39.6

130

36.9

123

Black Wildebeest

160

133

39.2

110

31.9

Red Hartebeest

136

125

37.4

125

29.6

Sitatunga

115

110

34.0

90

17.8

Tsessebe

126

110

34.0

115

26.1

150

Nyala

62

73

25.0

97

15.4

Red Lechwe

79

72

24.7

97

19.5

Puku

61

58

21.0

78

12.1

Blesbok

61

53

19.6

90

17.1

Bushpig

59

50

18.8

65

11.6

Warthog

57

45

17.4

65

12.2

85

Impala

60

45

17.4

90

15.4

100

Reedbuck

50

40

15.9

85

16.4

Mountain Reedbuck

28

25

11.2

75

7.6

Bushbuck

35

30

12.8

69

7.4

98

Sheep and Goatsb

42

30

12.8

60

14.8

Springbok

39

26

11.5

75

10.7

112

Common Duiker

20

15

7.6

50

5.8

70

Oribi

14

10

5.6

59

4.5

Steenbok

11

8

4.8

52

3.6

Grey Rhebok

20

15

7.6

75

7.3

Klipspringer

13.2

10

5.6

49

1.8

Red duiker

11.9

8

4.8

42

2.8

Sharpe's grysbok

7.5

6

3.8

47

2.6

Grysbok

10.5

6

3.8

54

3.0

Blue Duiker

4.7

4

2.8

30

1.6

Dik-Dik

5

4

2.8

40

1.9

Suni

5.4

4

2.8

35

1.5

  1. aMass, shoulder height and hoof area from three adult female elephants of known weight
  2. bMass and hoof area from Ssemakula (1983)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cumming, D.H.M., Cumming, G.S. Ungulate community structure and ecological processes: body size, hoof area and trampling in African savannas. Oecologia 134, 560–568 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1149-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1149-4

Keywords

Navigation