Skip to main content
Log in

Change in flatfoot of preschool-aged children: a 1-year follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in the signs of flatfoot of preschool-aged children in a 1-year follow-up study. This study performed follow-up on a total of 580 preschool-aged children (boys, 297 children; girls, 283 children) with a median age of 54 (range 36–71 months), and the average follow-up period was 11.8 months. This study used the Chippaux–Smirak index (CSI) of footprint as the assessment tool, and CSI > 62.70 % was used as the standard for determining whether preschool-aged children suffered from flatfoot. The results showed that the signs of flatfoot of preschool-aged children improved with increasing age. At the 1-year follow-up, the average CSI was 5.1 % lower, and the proportion of children with flatfoot was 14 % lower. The follow-up on the change in the signs of flatfoot showed that 37.6 % of the children originally with flatfoot had improved to normal, verifying that flatfoot indeed improves with increasing age. However, the results also showed that 9.9 % of the children who originally had normal feet had developed flatfoot with increasing age, which deserves subsequent investigation. The results of the follow-up also showed that children who were relatively younger, male, obese, and experiencing excessive joint laxity were more likely to experience the signs of flatfoot. Conclusion: The 1-year follow-up found that some preschool-aged children with flatfoot may develop normal feet, while children with normal feet may begin to experience the signs. Relevant factors affecting flatfoot in preschool-aged children continue to require further clarification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cappello T, Song KM (1998) Determining treatment of flatfeet in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 10:77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC (2010) Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 169:447–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JP, Chung MJ, Wang MJ (2009) Flatfoot prevalence and foot dimensions of 5- to 13-year-old children in Taiwan. Foot Ankle Int 30:326–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen KC, Yeh CJ, Kuo JF, Hsieh CL, Yang SF, Wang CH (2011) Footprint analysis of flatfoot in preschool-aged children. Eur J Pediatr 170:611–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen KC, Yeh CJ, Tung LC, Yang JF, Yang SF, Wang CH (2011) Relevant factors influencing flatfoot in preschool-aged children. Eur J Pediatr 170:931–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke HH (1933) An objective method of measuring the height of the longitudinal arch in foot examinations. Res Q 4:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen-Sobel E, Giorgini R, Velez Z (1995) Combined technique for surgical correction of pediatric severe flexible flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg 34:183–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dowling AM, Steele JR, Baur LA (2001) Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25:845–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Echarri JJ, Forriol F (2003) The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop B 12:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans AM (2008) The flat-footed child–to treat or not to treat: what is the clinician to do? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98:386–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forriol F, Pascual J (1990) Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 11:101–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Irwin LW (1937) A study of the tendency of school children to develop flat-footedness. Res Q 8:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  13. King DM, Toolan BC (2004) Associated deformities and hypermobility in hallux valgus: an investigation with weightbearing radiographs. Foot Ankle Int 25:251–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL (2001) Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 21:378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ (2006) The feet of overweight and obese young children: are they flat or fat? Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:1949–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ (2008) Is the foot structure of preschool children moderated by gender? J Pediatr Orthop 28:593–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Onodera AN, Sacco IC, Morioka EH, Souza PS, de Sa MR, Amadio AC (2008) What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot (Edinb) 18:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M (2006) Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 118:634–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shores M (1980) Footprint analysis in gait documentation. An instructional sheet format. Phys Ther 60:1163–1167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson MR (2006) Benign joint hypermobility syndrome: evaluation, diagnosis, and management. J Am Osteopath Assoc 106:531–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Staheli LT (1999) Planovalgus foot deformity. Current status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 89:94–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M (1987) The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:426–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Villarroya MA, Esquivel JM, Tomas C, Moreno LA, Buenafe A, Bueno G (2009) Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr 168:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Volpon JB (1994) Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop 14:83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wenger DR, Mauldin D, Speck G, Morgan D, Lieber RL (1989) Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:800–810

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all participants in this study and the physical therapists, Pei-Shan Tsai and Yi-Ying Tsai, who kindly provided assistance with data collection. This study was supported by research grants from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC99-2314-B-040-004-MY3).

Conflict of interest

No party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated. All authors state that they do not keep any commercial, financial, or personal relationships that may lead to a conflict of interest that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Ethical Board Review statement

Each author certifies that his institution approved the human protocol for this investigation that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained (CSMUH No.: CS09114).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Hou Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, KC., Tung, LC., Yeh, CJ. et al. Change in flatfoot of preschool-aged children: a 1-year follow-up study. Eur J Pediatr 172, 255–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-012-1884-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-012-1884-4

Keywords

Navigation