Skip to main content
Log in

Paediatric trauma and trauma care in Flanders (Belgium). Methodology and first descriptive results of the PENTA registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paediatric injury surveillance and prevention are definite priorities for the European, Belgian, and Flemish authorities. Current available data for Flanders (Belgium) are fragmentary and out-of-date. The PENTA registry (PaEdiatric Network around TraumA) was therefore set up to obtain recent population-based data on trauma and trauma care in children and youngsters in Flanders. Data were collected prospectively in a representative sample (n = 18) of Flemish emergency departments (ED). All children (age 0–17 years) who presented at the ED in 2005 or died prehospital due to trauma were included. The registry was split into two levels. The basic A registry (‘all’ trauma) consisted of 30 variables, and the more exhaustive B registry (‘severe trauma’, defined as length of hospitalisation >48 hours, including all nonsurvivors) collected data on 291 variables. The incidence for paediatric trauma presenting at Flemish ED was approximately 119/1000/year. Further data were collected in a random sample of 7,879 cases (21.9% of 35,900 eligible patients). Of all cases, 0.8% were considered ‘severe’ and included in the B registry. In conclusion, the ’burden‘ of injury in Flanders is still enormous. PENTA provides the first population-based data about the circumstances and the extent of injury in children and youngsters for the Flemish region. In this article we present in detail the surplus value of the methods used, the difficulties encountered, and the most relevant epidemiological findings from the registry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PENTA:

Paediatric network around trauma

ED:

Emergency departments

IDB:

European injury database

EMS:

Emergency medical services

MECU:

Mobile emergency care unit

CI:

Confidence interval

ISS:

Injury severity score

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

References

  1. Allen S, Zhu S, Sauter C, Layde P, Hargarten S (2006) A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem. Acad Emerg Med 13:427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Association for Automotive Medicine (1990) The abbreviated injury scale—1990 revision. Des Plaines, Illinois

  3. Amoros E, Martin JL, Laumon B (2007) Estimating non-fatal road casualties in a large French county, using the capture-recapture method. Accid Anal Prev 39:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker SD, O’Neill B, Haddon Jr W, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barell V, Aharonson-Daniel L, Fingerhutt LA, MacKenzie EJ, Ziv A, Boyko V, Abargel A, Avitzour M, Heruti R (2002) An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury matrix. Inj Prev 8:91–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazzoli GJ (1999) Community-based trauma system development: key barriers and facilitating factors. J Trauma 47:S22–S24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Moore L, Bamvita JM, Ratte S, Clas D (2006) Paying the price of excluding patients from a trauma registry. J Trauma 60:300–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Betz ME, Li G (2005) Epidemiologic patterns of injuries treated in ambulatory care settings. Ann Emerg Med 46:544–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner RA, Scheidt PC, Rossi MW, Cheng TL, Overpeck MD, Boenning DA, Wright JL, Kavee JD, Boyle KE (2002) Injury surveillance in the ED: design, implementation, and analysis. Am J Emerg Med 20:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Condello AS, Hancock BJ, Hoppensack M, Tenenbein M, Stewart TC, Kirwin D, Williamson J, Findlay C, Moffatt M, Wiseman N, Postuma R (2001) Pediatric trauma registries: the foundation of quality care. J Ped Surg 36:685–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E (2006) Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev 12:212–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Bartolomeo S, Nardi G, Sanson G, Gordini G, Michelutto V, Ciminello M, Giugni A, Cingolani E, Cancellieri F (2006) The first Italian trauma registry of national relevance: methodology and initial results. Eur J Emerg Med 13:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dick WF, Baskett PJ (1999) Recommendations for uniform reporting of data following major trauma—the Utstein style. A report of a working party of the International Trauma Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (ITACCS). Resuscitation 42:81–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eurotarn. Available at:http://www.eurotarn.org. Accessed 02 March 2004

  15. Guice K, Cassidy L, Mann NC (2007) State trauma registries: survey and update–2004. J Trauma 62:424–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hlaing T, Hollister L, Aaland M (2006) Trauma registry data validation: essential for quality trauma care. J Trauma 61:1400–1407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horan JM, Mallonee S (2003) Injury surveillance. Epid Reviews 25:24–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji M, Gilchick RA, Bender SJ (2006) Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County: the effect of bicycle helmet legislation. Accid Anal Prev 38:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lund J, Bjerkedal T, Gravseth HM, Vilimas K, Wergeland E (2004) A two step medically based injury surveillance system experiences from the Oslo injury register. Accid Anal Prev 36:1003–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcin JP, Pollack MM (2002) Triage scoring systems, severity of illness measures and mortality prediction models in pediatric trauma. Crit Care Med 30:S457–S467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miettinen OS, Nurminen M (1985) Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med 4:213–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mock C (2001) Case series and trauma registries. In: Rivera FP, Cummings P, Koepsell TD, Grossman DC, Maier RV (eds). Injury control: a guide to research and program evaluation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 168–182

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morrison A, Stone DH (1998) Injury surveillance in accident and emergency departments: To sample or not sample? Inj Prev 4:50–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mueller BA (2001) Data linkages and using administrative and secondary databases. In: Rivera FP, Cummings P, Koepsell TD, Grossman DC, Maier RV (eds). Injury control: a guide to research and program evaluation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 47–63

    Google Scholar 

  25. Otters H, Schellevis FG, Damen J, van der Wouden JC, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Koes BW (2005) Epidemiology of unintentional injuries in childhood: a population-based survey in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 55:630–633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Owen Jl, Bolenbaucher RM, Moore ML (1999) Trauma registry databases: a comparison of data abstraction, interpretation, and entry at two level 1 trauma centers. J Trauma 46:1100–1104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patefield WM (1981) Algorithm AS159. An efficient method of generating r x c tables with given row and column totals. Appl Stat 30:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petridou E, Dessypris N, Frangakis CE, Belechri M, Mavrou A, Trichopoulos D (2004) Estimating the population burden of injuries—a comparison of household surveys and emergency department surveillance. Epidemiology 15:428–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Polinder S, Meerding WJ, Mulder S, Petridou E, van Beeck E (2007) EUROCOST reference group. Assessing the burden of injury in six European countries. Bull World Health Organ 85:27–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Raux M, Thicoïpé M, Wiel E, Rancurel E, Savary D, David JS, Berthier F, Ricard-Hibon A, Birgel F, Riou B (2006) Comparison of respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation to assess severity in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 32:405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.4.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 26 December 2007

  32. Renard C (2006) Actieplan voor de kinderveiligheid. Situatieanalyse, ontwerpversie 4. Brussel, OIVO. D-2006–2492

  33. Schneier AJ, Shields BJ, Hostetler SG, Xiang H, Smith GA (2006) Incidence of pediatric traumatic brain injury and associated hospital resource utilization in the United States. Pediatrics 118:483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mercator (2004) SNAP 8.0 professional campus edition. Mercator Ltd., Bristol UK. Available at http://www.snapsurveys.com. Accessed 26 December 2007

  35. StatsDirect (2007) StatsDirect statistical software, version 2.6.2. StatsDirect Ltd. Available at http://www.statsdirect.com. Accessed 26 December 2007

  36. DG Sanco and The European Commission (2007) The injury database. Available at https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/idbpa/. Accessed 02 March 2007

  37. Tepas JJ 3rd (2004) The National Pediatric Trauma Registry: a legacy of commitment to the control of childhood injury. Semin Ped Surg 13:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  38. Towner E, Dowswell T (2002). Community-based childhood injury prevention interventions: what works? Health Promot Int 17:273–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Audit Commission (2007) UK Health National Report. Better safe than sorry: preventing unintentional injury to children. London, February 2007. Available at http://www.audit-commision.gov.uk. Accessed 18 February 2007

  40. Valent F, Messi G, Deroma L, De Marchi C, Norbedo S, Marchi AG (2007). A descriptive study of injuries in a pediatric population of North-Eastern Italy. Eur J Pediatr 166:949–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Valepyn P (2004) Monitorrapport MUG/Spoed. Afdeling verzorgingsvoorzieningen. Ministerie Vlaamse Gemeenschap. Available at http://www.wvc.vlaanderen.be/ziekenhuizen/rapporten/word/Monitoringrapport_spoed-MUG. Accessed 16 September 2006

  42. Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering (2005) Vlaamse statistieken, strategisch management & survey onderzoek. Demografie. Available at http://aps.vlaanderen.be/statistiek/cijfers/stat_cijfers_demografie.htm. Accessed 16 September 2006

  43. Wynn A, Wise M, Wright MJ, Rafaat A, Wang YZ, Steeb G, McSwain N, Beuchter KJ, Hunt JP (2001) Accuracy of administrative and trauma registry databases. J Trauma 51:464–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yates DW, Woolford M, Hollis S (1992) Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: first report of the United Kingdom major trauma outcome study. BMJ 305:737–740

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Flemish paediatric trauma registry (PENTA) was funded by the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research: project Levenslijn. The following Flemish hospitals participated in the registry: ASZ Aalst, St. Blasius Dendermonde, UZ Gent , AZ MMSJ Gent, Jan Palfijn ZH Gent, AZ St. Lucas Gent, AZ Oudenaarde, AZ MM St. Niklaas, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, HH ZH Menen, HH ZH Roeselare, AZ St. Maarten Mechelen, AZ St. Maarten Duffel , St. Vincentius ZH Antwerpen, Klina Brasschaat, AZ Stuivenberg Antwerpen, ZH Noord-Limburg Lommel, ZOL Genk, and UZ Gasthuisberg Leuven.

PENTA was the result of the combined effort of a lot of people in each hospital. We would like to thank: Mevr. Elena Kourdiokova, Dr. L Vergote, Dr. de Leeuw, Mevr. I De Boeck, Dr. P Vandenbroucke, Dr. K Van Laeken, Dr. Van Bosstraeten, Dhr. A Van Den Steen, Dr. A Verrijckt, Dhr. P Fortain, Dhr. M Jonckers, Mevr. A Van der Gucht, Dr. F Plasschaert, Prof. Dr. D Matthys, Prof. W Buylaert, Mevr. H Goedertier, Dr. K Kamoen, Dr. A De Somer, Dhr. A Roberti, Dr. T Vercruysse, Dr. De Graeve, Dhr. J Goossens, Dhr. Van Quaethem, Dr. B Dewilde, Dr. M Van Der Plaetsen, Dr. Snoeck, Dhr. E De Jonghe, Dr. J Damen, Dr. J Van Tichelen, Dr. G Putzeys, Dr. Struyve, Dhr. G Gunst, Mevr. R Herpoel, Dr. R Demey, Dr. E Coppé, Dhr. C Delie, Dhr. W Seynaeve, Dr. K Spoelders, Dr. F Gijsenbergh, Dhr. L Gijbels, Dr. A Vertruyen, Dr. Druwé, Dhr. L Van De Heijning, Dr. L Mortelmans, Dr. G Smets, Dr. Vundelinckx, Dhr. J De Houer, Mevr. K Smeets, Dr. Y Claessens, Dhr. Ml Hendrickx, Mevr. H Vereecken, and all others who helped in tasks including, collecting, retrieving, etc.

The Flemish paediatric trauma registry (PENTA) was funded by the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research: project Levenslijn.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Van de Voorde.

Electronic supplementary material

The A data registration sheet. Unofficial translation in English for informative purposes.

(GIF 126 kb)

(GIF 133 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van de Voorde, P., Sabbe, M., Calle, P. et al. Paediatric trauma and trauma care in Flanders (Belgium). Methodology and first descriptive results of the PENTA registry. Eur J Pediatr 167, 1239–1249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0660-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0660-3

Keywords

Navigation