Skip to main content
Log in

Contribution to the origin and development of the appendices of the testis and epididymis in humans

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydatids, as appendices of testis or epididymis, were discovered by Morgagni in 1703 and 1705 and published by him in 1761. Hydatids are considered to be remnants of the cranial part of the Müllerian duct (MD), Wolffian duct (WD), or mesonephric tubules. They are localized as sessile or pedunculated appendices at the cranial pole of testis and at the head of epididymis, or at analogous organs in women. The clinical relevance is known: acute scrotum with torsion of appendices, or metaplasia. However, little is known about the embryological development of hydatids. Therefore, we studied the origin and development of appendix testis (AT) and appendix epididymidis (AE) in human embryos from stage 14 (Carnegie Collection), 6.5 mm GL, 32 days, to fetuses of 170 mm, 17th week. Light and scanning-electron microscopy as well as plastic reconstructions from serial sections of the cranial parts of MD and WD reveal that hydatids already form during regression or transformation of the ducts. At stage 18, 15–16 mm GL, 44 days, the cranial parts of MD and WD exhibit morphological features that give a preview on the definite form and position of later appendices. In fetuses from 45 mm GL, ninth week onward, we found anlagen of pedunculated hydatids (AE) deriving from the ampullated cranial end of the WD, which in many cases opened into the coelomic cavity. The unpedunculated AT derived from the persisting funnel region of the MD. The development of duct-independent, accessory appendices was observed. We paid special attention to a pedunculated hydatid in a fetus of 120 mm, 14th week, and the cranial regressing WD. A classification of hydatids is presented. Photographs and histological sections of (sessile) appendices testis (AT), and (pedunculated) appendices epididymidis (AE) with torsion of stalks exhibit the final forms and positions of hydatids in adult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2 a
Fig. 3 a
Fig. 4 a
Fig. 5
Fig. 6 a
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

:

AE appendix epididymis

:

AT appendix testis

:

MD Müllerian duct

:

WD Wolffian duct

References

  • Allard S, Adin P, Gouedard L, di Clemente N, Josso N, Orgebin-Crist MC, Picard JY, Xavier F (2000) Molecular mechanisms of hormone-mediated Müllerian duct regression: involvement of ß-catenin. Development 127:3349–3360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin HB (1995) DiI analysis of cell migration during Mullerian duct regression. Dev Biol 169:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barteczko KJ, Jacob MI (1999) Comparative study of shape, course, and disintegration of the rostral notochord in some vertebrates, especially humans. Anat Embryol (Berl) 200:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Barteczko KJ, Jacob MI (2000) Testicular descent in humans. Advanc Anat Embryol Cell Biol, vol. 156. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Barteczko KJ, Jacob MI (2002) Beitrag zur Entstehung von Hydatiden beim Menschen. Verh Anat Ges 97 [Anat Anz Suppl 184] p 60

  • Behringer RR (1995) The Müllerian inhibitor and mammalian sexual development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 350:285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet R, Peter K (eds) (1929) Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte. Parey, Berlin

  • Bransilver BR, Ferenczy A, Richart RM (1973) Female genital tract remnants. An ultrastructural comparison of hydatid of Morgagni and Mesonephros ducts and tubules. Arch Pathol 96:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Colt GH (1922) Torsion of the hydatid of Morgagni. Br J Surg 9:464

    Google Scholar 

  • Desautel MG, Stock J, Hanna MK (1999) Müllerian duct remnants: Surgical management and fertility issues. J Urol 162:1008–1014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dix VW (1931) Über Torsion des Hodenanhanges. Z Urol Chirg 33:486–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberth CJ (1904) Die männlichen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Bardeleben v K (ed) Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. Fischer, Jena, Germany

  • Fleischl E (1871) Das Ovarium masculinum. Centralbl f d Med Wissensch 4, cited from Roth (1877)

  • Glabeke E von, Khairouni A, Larroquet M, Audry G, Gruner M (1999) Acute scrotal pain in children: results of 543 surgical explorations. Pediatr Surg Int 15:353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal HO (1983) Appendix epididymidis and aberrant ductules of the bull: Light-microscopic and ultrastructural study. Acta Anat (Basel) 117:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths J (1894) Observations on the appendix of the testicle, and on the cysts of the epididymis, the vasa efferentia, and the rete testis. J Anat Physiol 28:107–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WJ, Boyd ID, Mossman HW (eds) (1972) Human embryology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

  • Holstein AF (1969) Morphologische Studien am Nebenhoden des Menschen. In: Bargmann W, Doerr W (eds) Zwanglose Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiet der normalen und pathologischen Anatomie, issue 20. Medical Faculty, Hamburg 1967, Habil.-Schrift, Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 57–91

  • Ivens U (1972) Zur Morphologie und Funktion der Appendix testis. Andrologie 4(3):245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Conrad C, Jacob HJ, Barteczko KJ (1995) Über die Entstehung, Differenzierung und Migration des Müllerschen Ganges. Verh Anat Ges 93 [Anat Anz Suppl 177] pp 121–122

  • Jacob M, Konrad K, Jacob HJ (1999) Early development of the Müllerian duct in avian embryos with reference to the human. Cells Tissues Organs 164:63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Jacob HJ, Barteczko KJ (2000a) Embryologie des Urogenitalsystems. In: Wullich B, Zang K (eds) Genetik von Erkrankungen des Urogenitalsystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Jacob M, Jacob HJ, Barteczko KJ, Süß F (2000b) Early development of urogenital system in vertebrates. J Egypt Germ Soc Zool 32:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB, Sarda R, Uehling DT (1999) Müllerian-type epithelial tumor arising within a torsed appendix testis. Urology 54:561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P (1961) Torsion of the testis and its appendages during childhood. Arch Dis Child 37:214–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Josso N, Rey R, Gonzalès J (2003) Pediatric Endocrinology. Sexual differentiation. Chapter 7. Endotext New M (ed) http:77www.Endotext.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobelt GL (1847) Der Neben-Eierstock des Weibes, das längst vermisste Seitenstück des Neben-Hoden des Mannes entdeckt. Julius Groos, Heidelberg

  • Lambert J (1937) Torsion of the testicle and of the hydatid of Morgagni. Br J Surg 25:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Luschka H (1854) Die Appendiculargebilde des Hoden. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 6:311–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta P (1966) Contributo alla struttura ed ultrastruttura dell’epitelio dell’idatide del Morgagni. Arch Ostet Ginecol 71(5):473–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöske HD, Kraus SW, Altinkilic BM, Weidner W (1998) Historical milestones regarding torsion of the scrotal organs. J Urol 159:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rahilly R, Müller F (eds) (1999) Embryologie und Teratologie des Menschen. Huber, Bern

  • Politzer G, Zeitlhofer J (1958) Die Mißbildungen der männlichen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Schwalbe E (ed) Morphologie der Mißbildungen des Menschen und der Tiere. Fischer, Jena, Germany, pp 886–989

  • Posinovec J (1969) Ist die ungestielte Hydatide ein funktionierendes Organ? Anat Anz 125:751–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts LM, Hirokawa Y, Nachtigal MW, Ingraham HA (1999) Paracrine-mediated apoptosis in reproductive tract development. Dev Biol 208:110–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts LM, Visser JA, Ingraham HA (2002) Involvement of a matrix metalloproteinase in MIS-induced cell death during urogenital development. Development 129:1487–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolnick D, Kawanoue S, Szanto P, Bush IM (1968) Anatomical incidence of testicular appendages. J Urol 100:755–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth M (1877) Die ungestielte oder Morgagni’sche Hydatide. Z Anat Entw-Gesch 2:128–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth M (1882) Über einige Urnierenreste beim Menschen. Festschrift zur Feier des 300jährigen Bestehens der Julius-Maximilians-Universität zu Würzburg. Gewidmet von der Universität Basel. Schultze’sche Universitätsdruckerei, Basel, pp 61–87

  • Sahni D, Jit I, Joshi K, Sanjeev (1996) Incidence and structure of the appendices of the testis and epididymis. J Anat 189:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Samnakay N, Cohen RJ, Orford J, King PA, Davies RJ (2003) Androgen and oestrogen receptor status of the human appendix testis. Pediatr Surg Int 19:520–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Starck D (ed) (1975) Embryologie. Thieme, Stuttgart

  • Sundarasivarao D (1953) The Müllerian vestiges and benign epithelial tumours of the epididymis. J Pathol Bacteriol 66: 417–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchmann-Duplessis H, Haegel P (eds) (1972) Illustrated human embryology, vol 2. Organogenesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Viebahn C, Wartenberg H (2003) Entwicklung des Harn- und Genitalsystems. In: Drenckhahn D (ed) Benninghoff - Drenckhahn: Anatomie, vol 1. Urban and Fischer, Munich

  • Waldeyer W (1877) Über die sogenannte ungestielte Hydatide des Menschen. Arch Mikrosk Anat 13:278–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1985) Morphological studies on the role of the periductal stroma in the regression of the human male Müllerian duct. Anat Embryol (Berl) 171:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1990) Entwicklung der Genitalorgane und Bildung der Gameten. In: Hinrichsen K (ed) Humanembryologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 745–822

  • Watson JH (1902) Some observations on the origin and nature of the so-called hydatids of Morgagni found in men and women, with special reference to the fate of the Müllerian duct in the epididymis. J Anat Physiol 36:147–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel KH (2003) The genus Acipenser as a model for vertebrate urogenital development: the müllerian duct. Anat Embryol (Berl) 206:255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel KH, Süß F (2000) The significance of rudimentary nephrostomial tubules for the origin of the vertebrate gonad. Anat Embryol (Berl) 201:273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman S, Krohn PL (1937) The hydatids of Morgagni under normal and experimental conditions. Phil Trans Ser B 228:147–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We particularly thank Dr. Heinz Juergen Jacob, who kindly provided the SEM in Figs. 2c and 4a and b. We are grateful to Mrs. Annegrit Schlichting for technical assistance, and Mrs. Antje Jaeger for expert photographic work, including taking the photographs in Fig. 11a and b

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Monika Jacob or Klaus Barteczko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, M., Barteczko, K. Contribution to the origin and development of the appendices of the testis and epididymis in humans. Anat Embryol 209, 287–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-004-0445-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-004-0445-7

Keywords

Navigation