Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Periacinar retraction clefting in the prostatic needle core biopsies: an important diagnostic criterion or a simple artifact?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle core biopsy is based on major and supportive criteria. One of the supportive criteria is the presence of retraction clefting around neoplastic glands. We analyzed a series of 137 prostatic cancer cases diagnosed by needle core biopsy to determine the frequency, extent and criteria for periacinar retraction clefting. Clefting was analyzed on ten neoplastic and ten normal glands in three different high power fields. One-third or more glands with clefts affecting more than 50% of circumference were significantly more common in tumors (51.8%) than in benign glands (8%) (P<0.0001). A stricter criterion that designated as positive the cases with at least 50% of neoplastic glands (15 of 30) with clefts that affected more than 50% of circumference revealed clefts in only 15.3% of the malignant cases but none in benign cases (0%) (P<0.0001). Regardless of their extension, 15 or more glands with clefts were also more prominent in malignant cases (86.9%) than in benign cases (20.4%) (P<0.0001). We conclude that periacinar retraction clefting represents a reliable criterion for diagnosis of the prostatic adenocarcinoma, especially in cases with clefts affecting more than 50% of circumference in at least 50% of suspicious glands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baisden BL, Kahane H, Epstein JI (1999) Perineural invasion, mucinous fibroplasia and glomerulations: diagnostic features on prostate needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 23:918–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bostwick DG, Dundore PA. (1997) Biopsy pathology of the prostate. Chapmann & Hall Medical, London

  3. Durham JR, Lee MW, Amin MB, Shulz DS, Stetler-Stevenson WG (1994) Clefting in adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (abstract). Am J Clin Pathol 102:536

    Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein JI (1995) Diagnostic criteria of limited adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Hum Pathol 26:223–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halpert B, Schmalhorst WR (1966) Carcinoma of the prostate in patients 70 to 79 years old. Cancer 19:695–698

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpert B, Sheehan EA, Schmalhorst WR, Scott RJ (1963) Carcinoma of the prostate: a survey of 5000 autopsies. Cancer 16:736–742

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krušlin B, Novosel I, Reljić A, Čupić H, Spajić B, Belicza M (2002) Periacinar cleft-like spaces in prostatic needle core biopsies (abstract). Acta Clin Croat 41:175

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogatsch H, Mairinger T, Horninger W, Gschwendtner A, Bartsch G, Mikuz G (2000) Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies. Prostate 42:124–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rogatsch H, Moser P, Volgger H, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Mikuz G, Mairinger T (2000) Diagnostic effect of an improved preembedding method of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Hum Pathol 31:1102–1107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorson P, Vollmer RT, Arcangeli C, Keetch DW, Humphrey PA (1998) Minimal carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens: diagnostic features and radical prostatectomy follow-up. Mod Pathol 11:543–551

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varma M, Lee MW, Tamboli P, Zarbo RJ, Jimenez RE, Salles PGO, Amin MB (2002) Morphologic criteria for the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126:554–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Young RH, Srigley JR, Amin MB, Ulbright TM, Cubilla AL (1998) Atlas of tumor pathology. AFIP, Washington, D.C., pp 124–171

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Božo Krušlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krušlin, B., Tomas, D., Rogatsch, H. et al. Periacinar retraction clefting in the prostatic needle core biopsies: an important diagnostic criterion or a simple artifact?. Virchows Arch 443, 524–527 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-003-0862-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-003-0862-7

Keywords

Navigation