Abstract
Perceptual priming is a well-known phenomenon showing that the repetition of an object’s feature can facilitate subsequent detection of that item. Although the priming effect has been rigorously studied in visual search, less is known about its effect on working memory and it is unclear whether the repetition of similar features, and furthermore, ensemble perception created by a large set of similar features, can induce priming. In this study, we investigated the priming effects of individual similarity and ensemble perception in visual search and visual working memory (VWM). We replicated the classic perceptual priming effect (Experiment 1a) and found that visual search was enhanced when the current target had a similar color to the previous target (Experiment 1b), but not when the similar color had been shown as a distractor before (Experiment 1c). However, if the target and distractors of similar colors formed ensemble perception, the search efficiency was again promoted even when the current target shared the same color with the previous distractor (Experiment 1d). For VWM, repeating the ensembles of the target- and nontarget-color subsets did not significantly affect the memory capacity, while switching the two harmed the memory fidelity but not capacity (Experiment 2). We suggest different underlying mechanisms for priming in visual search and VWM: in the former, the perception history of individual similarity and stimuli ensemble exert their effects on through the priority map, by forming a gradient distribution of attentional weights that peak at the previous target feature and diminish as stimulus diverges from the previously selected one; while in the latter, perception history of memory ensemble may influence the deployment of existing memory resources across trials, thereby affecting the memory fidelity but not its capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials associated with this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003
Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.937
Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 952–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600822795
Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00327
Ariga, A., & Kawahara, J. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4(10), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.10.5
Attarha, M., Moore, C. M., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Summary statistics of size: Fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1440–1449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036206
Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 1–11.
Becker, S. I., & Ansorge, U. (2013). Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection. Vision Research, 81, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.009
Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2009). Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Vision Research, 49(14), 1738–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.001
Brady, T. F., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: Ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items. Psychological Science, 22(3), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610397956
Brady, T. F., & Alvarez, G. A. (2015). Contextual effects in visual working memory reveal hierarchically structured memory representations. Journal of Vision, 15(15), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.15.6
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.523
Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2011). A neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory (NTVA). Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1446–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.006
Chetverikov, A., Campana, G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2016). Building ensemble representations: How the shape of preceding distractor distributions affects visual search. Cognition, 153, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.018
Chetverikov, A., Campana, G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2017a). Representing color ensembles. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617713787
Chetverikov, A., Campana, G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2017b). Set size manipulations reveal the boundary conditions of perceptual ensemble learning. Vision Research, 140, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.08.003
Chetverikov, A., Campana, G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Probabilistic rejection templates in visual working memory. Cognition, 196, 104075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104075
Choi, Y. M., & Chong, S. C. (2020). Effects of selective attention on mean-size computation: Weighted averaging and perceptual enlargement. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620943834
Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00596-5
Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45(7), 891–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.004
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10(4), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00168
Constant, M., & Liesefeld, H. R. (2021). Massive effects of saliency on information processing in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 32(5), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620975785
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003922
Cui, L., & Liu, Z. (2021). Synergy between research on ensemble perception, data visualization, and statistics education: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83(3), 1290–1311. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02212-x
Czoschke, S., Fischer, C., Beitner, J., Kaiser, J., & Bledowski, C. (2019). Two types of serial dependence in visual working memory. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 110(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12349
Dent, K. (2018). Priming of Pop-out does not provide reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention: Evidence from a large-scale online study. Vision Research, 149, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.10.011
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Fischer, C., Czoschke, S., Peters, B., Rahm, B., Kaiser, J., & Bledowski, C. (2020). Context information supports serial dependence of multiple visual objects across memory episodes. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15874-w
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847
Hansmann-Roth, S., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2019). Representing color and orientation ensembles: Can observers learn multiple feature distributions? Journal of Vision, 19(9), 2. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.9.2
Hansmann-Roth, S., Kristjánsson, Á., Whitney, D., & Chetverikov, A. (2021). Dissociating implicit and explicit ensemble representations reveals the limits of visual perception and the richness of behavior. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3899. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83358-y
Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(4), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206924
Hollingworth, A., & Beck, V. M. (2016). Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000230
Huang, J., & Sekuler, R. (2010). Distortions in recall from visual memory: Two classes of attractors at work. Journal of Vision, 10(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.2.24
Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195816
Hulleman, J. (2020). Quantitative and qualitative differences in the top-down guiding attributes of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 46(9), 942–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000764
Kristjánsson, Á. (2006). Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Research, 46(16), 2554–2570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.015
Kristjánsson, Á. (2009). Independent and additive repetition priming of motion direction and color in visual search. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0205-z
Kristjánsson, Á., & Ásgeirsson, Á. G. (2019). Attentional priming: Recent insights and current controversies. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.013
Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.5
Kristjánsson, A., & Driver, J. (2008). Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal. Vision Research, 48(10), 1217–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.007
Kristjánsson, A., Vuilleumier, P., Malhotra, P., Husain, M., & Driver, J. (2005). Priming of color and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929054021148
Lamy, D., Antebi, C., Aviani, N., & Carmel, T. (2008). Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Vision Research, 48(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.009
Lamy, D., Yashar, A., & Ruderman, L. (2013). Orientation search is mediated by distractor suppression: Evidence from priming of pop-out. Vision Research, 81, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.008
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279.
Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Proactive interference from items previously stored in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.1.43
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209251
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7(5), 571–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800407202
Maule, J., & Franklin, A. (2016). Accurate rapid averaging of multihue ensembles is due to a limited capacity subsampling mechanism. Journal of the Optical Society of America. a, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 33(3), A22–A29. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.33.000A22
Olivers, C. N., & Hickey, C. (2010). Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology. Vision Research, 50(14), 1362–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.022
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500308101
Oriet, C., & Brand, J. (2013). Size averaging of irrelevant stimuli cannot be prevented. Vision Research, 79, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.004
Qian, J., & Zhang, K. (2019). Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise—evidence from a change detection task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1657–1665.
Qian, J., Zhang, K., Liu, S., & Lei, Q. (2019). The transition from feature to object: storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 47(8), 1498–1514.
Qian, J., Zhang, K., Lei, Q., Han, Y., & Li, W. (2020). Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory. Psychological Research, 84, 1304–1319.
Robitaille, N., & Harris, I. M. (2011). When more is less: Extraction of summary statistics benefits from larger sets. Journal of Vision, 11(12), 18. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.12.18
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
Sigurdardottir, H. M., Kristjánsson, A., & Driver, J. (2008). Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in visual search of brief displays. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701218364
Sokolov, E. N., & Nezlina, N. I. (2010). Segmentation, grouping and accentuation during stimulus perception. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 40(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9255-y
Stadler, M. A., & Hogan, M. E. (1996). Varieties of positive and negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210745
Sweeny, T. D., Haroz, S., & Whitney, D. (2013). Perceiving group behavior: sensitive ensemble coding mechanisms for biological motion of human crowds. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028712
Sweeny, T. D., Wurnitsch, N., Gopnik, A., & Whitney, D. (2015). Ensemble perception of size in 4–5-year-old children. Developmental Science, 18(4), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12239
Tanrikulu, Ö. D., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Encoding perceptual ensembles during visual search in peripheral vision. Journal of Vision, 20(8), 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.8.20
Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (2013). Contextual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028069
Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 16(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197746
Treue, S., & Trujillo, J. C. M. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399(6736), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1038/21176
Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(4), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
Utochkin, I. S., & Brady, T. F. (2020). Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(5), 458–473.
van den Berg, R., Awh, E., & Ma, W. J. (2014). Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychological Review, 121(1), 124.
Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000472
Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232
Yildirim, I., Öğreden, O., & Boduroglu, A. (2018). Impact of spatial grouping on mean size estimation. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1847–1862. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1560-5
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed- resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233.
Zhang, K., & Qian, J. (2022). The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information. Journal of Vision, 22(6), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.6.4
Zhang, K., Gao, D. G., & Qian, J. (2021). Overestimation and contraction biases of depth information stored in working memory depend on spatial configuration. British Journal of Psychology, 112, 230–246.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271100), and the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515010840).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WL: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; software; writing—original draft. JQ: funding acquisition; methodology; project administration; supervision; writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing financial interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
This research has been approved by the Sun Yat-sen University Internal Review Board, Ethical committees of Department of Psychology, following the guideline of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study was not preregistered.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, W., Qian, J. Priming effect of individual similarity and ensemble perception in visual search and working memory. Psychological Research 88, 719–734 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01902-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01902-z