Abstract
Evidence suggests that religious systems have specific effects on attentional and action control processes. The present study investigated whether religions also modulate choices that involve higher-order knowledge and the delay of gratification in particular. We tested Dutch Calvinists, Italian Catholics, and Atheists from both countries/cultures using an intertemporal choice task where participants could choose between a small immediate and a larger delayed monetary reward. Based on the Calvinist theory of predestination and the Catholic concept of a cycle of sin–confession–expiation, we predicted a reduced delay tolerance, i.e., higher discount rate, for Italian Catholics than for Dutch Calvinists, and intermediate rates for the two atheist groups. Analyses of discount rates support our hypotheses. We also found a magnitude effect on temporal discounting and faster responses for large than for small rewards across religions and countries/cultures. We conclude that temporal discounting is specifically modulated by religious upbringing rather than by generic cultural differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As one anonymous reviewer suggested, it could be argued that these results should not be explained in terms of individualism versus collectivism, but rather as resulting from the opposition between materialism versus spiritualism. The suggestion here would be to stress that the USA and China share a long tradition of materialism, whereas Japanese culture, in spite of its recent consumeristic turn, is much more rooted in metaphysical concepts like “muga-mushin” (no-self, no-mind) that transcend the boundaries of the physical self. This could help explaining why Chinese and Americans are more attracted by tempting short-term options (thus exhibiting higher delay discounting) than Japanese. Regardless of the merit of this hypothesis, the very fact that multiple interpretations of cultural differences are often possible and even plausible strengthens our point: a more precise and fine-grained understanding of what drives such differences is needed, and religious beliefs offer a very promising domain in that respect.
Due to the practical difficulties involved in testing subjects belonging to different religious groups across two countries, we were unable to have exactly the same number of participants for each group. However, we managed to keep numerical variation across groups within reasonable limits.
References
Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berns, G., Laibson, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Intertemporal choice—toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488.
Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions (Vol. 1, pp. 105–126)., Rationality and well-being Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, H., Ng, S., & Rao, A. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291–301.
Colzato, L., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., et al. (2010). God, do I have your attention? Cognition, 117, 87–94.
Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W., & Hommel, B. (2008). Losing the big picture: how religion controls visual attention. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003679.
Curry, O., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G. (2008). Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780–785.
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record, 52, 479–492.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.
Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.
Green, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.
Harris, A., & Madden, G. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 simple societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–18.
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: on the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon. Journal of Religion & Science, 45, 596–604.
Hommel, B., Colzato, L., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011). Action control and religion: faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance. Cognition, 120, 177–185.
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.
Ito, M., Saeki, D., & Green, L. (2011). Sharing, discounting and selfishness: a Japanese–American comparison. The Psychological Record, 60, 59–76.
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.
Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.
Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 61–73.
Kacen, J., & Lee, J. (2002). The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.
Kim, B., Sung, Y. S., & McClure, S. (2012). The neural basis of cultural differences in delay discounting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 650–656.
Kirby, K. (1997). Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70.
Kirby, K. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 457–462.
Kirby, K., & Marakovic, N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.
Kirby, K., & Petry, N. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction, 99, 461–471.
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206.
Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioral Processes, 69, 173–187.
Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., & Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 543–560.
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.
Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.
Madden, G., & Johnson, P. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. In G. Madden & W. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 11–37). Washington: APA.
Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A., Mueller, A., Hehli, D., et al. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards. Part II: between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.
Mahajna, A., Ben-Zion, U., Bogaire, R., & Shavit, T. (2007). Subjective discount rates among Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews. Working Papers 07–10, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.
McCullough, M., & Willoughby, B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93.
McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1858–1863.
Moyer, R., & Bayer, R. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 228–246.
Nisbett, R., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11163–11170.
Nisbett, R., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in Ultimatum Game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.
Paglieri, F. (in press). The costs of delay. Waiting vs. postponing in intertemporal choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, forthcoming.
Petry, N. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.
Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. (2008). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29–43.
Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Rosati, A. G., Stevens, J. R., Hare, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology, 17, 1663–1668.
Sozou, P. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 2015–2020.
Stevens, J., & Hauser, M. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 60–65.
Strotz, R. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.
Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691–693.
Takahashi, T., Hadzibeganovic, T., Cannas, S., Makino, T., Fukui, H., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 30(2), 185–191.
Tan, C., & Johnson, R. (1996). To wait or not to wait: the influence of culture on discounting behavior. In W. Loke (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 297–305). Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. (2003). Religion: an overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 377–394.
Tsukayama, T., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 72–82.
Weber, M. (1958/2003). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Zauberman, G., Kim, B., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543–556.
Acknowledgments
The research of the first author was funded by an ISTC-CNR intramural grant. The authors are grateful to the participants of the Intertemporal Day workshop (Rome, 29/05/2012), for providing useful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. We are also indebted to Wilfried Kunde and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful criticisms and suggestions for improvement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paglieri, F., Borghi, A.M., Colzato, L.S. et al. Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting. Psychological Research 77, 738–747 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0473-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0473-5