Skip to main content
Log in

The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiments was to investigate the generation of conscious awareness (i.e., of verbal report) in an incidental learning situation. While the single-system account assumes that all markers of learning, verbal or nonverbal, index the same underlying knowledge representation, multiple-systems accounts grant verbal report a special status as a marker of learning because they assume that the nonverbal and verbal effects of learning rely on different memory representations. We tested these two accounts in two experiments in which we held the amount of learning in the nonverbal memory system constant while manipulating independent variables aimed at affecting learning in the declarative system. The results of both experiments revealed significant differences in verbal report between experimental conditions, but no significant differences in response times. Overall, these results provide clear evidence in favor of the multiple-systems account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French, A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making? (pp. 1–40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic process: A parallel distributed processing account. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2002). A theory of the implicit nature of implicit learning. In R. M. French, A. Cleeremans, (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., & Donovan, T., et al (2001). Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A. & Rünger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., Haider, H., Rünger, D., Neugebauer, U., Voigt, S., & Werg, J. (2002). Verbal report of incidentally experienced environmental regularity: The route from implicit learning to verbal expression of what has been learned. In L. Jiménez, (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 335–366). Benjamins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, A., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: A single-system connectionist account. Psychological Review, 110, 728–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979). Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of stress and emotion. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (2002). Consciousness recovered: Psychological functions and origins of conscious thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwarts, & D. Shapiro, (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory, vol 4 (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P., Bigand, E., & Benoit-Gonin, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with or without awareness. Learning & Memory, 1, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 248–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., Haider, H., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2002). Medial temporal lobe involvement in implicit learning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 36, 1221–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., Haider, H., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2004). The relevance of the nature of learned associations for the differentiation of human memory systems. Learning & Memory, 11, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (2000a). Consciousness, content, and metacognitive judgements. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (2000b). Metacognition and higher-order thoughts (extended response to commentaries). Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, T. Johnstone, (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R. (2003). Attention and awareness in “implicit” sequence learning. In L. Jiménez, (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 11–42). New York: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R., Wilkinson, L., & Channon, S. (2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 232–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L., Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs,2, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427, 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation and preserving of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. L. Medin, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 37 (p. 211–264). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002a). Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002b). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 96–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 547–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b) The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkielmann, P., Schwarz, N., & Nowak, A. (2002). Affect and processing dynamics. In S. Moore, M. Oaksford, (Eds.), Emotional cognition (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltz, D. J., Bell, B. G., Kyllonen, P. C., & Gardner, M. K. (1996). Memory for order of operations in the acquisition and transfer of sequential cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 438–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltz, D. J., Gardner, M. K., & Bell, B. G. (2000). Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: Strong-but-wrong sequence application. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 601–625.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilde Haider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haider, H., Frensch, P.A. The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation. Psychological Research 69, 399–411 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0209-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0209-2

Keywords

Navigation