Abstract
The purpose of the present experiments was to investigate the generation of conscious awareness (i.e., of verbal report) in an incidental learning situation. While the single-system account assumes that all markers of learning, verbal or nonverbal, index the same underlying knowledge representation, multiple-systems accounts grant verbal report a special status as a marker of learning because they assume that the nonverbal and verbal effects of learning rely on different memory representations. We tested these two accounts in two experiments in which we held the amount of learning in the nonverbal memory system constant while manipulating independent variables aimed at affecting learning in the declarative system. The results of both experiments revealed significant differences in verbal report between experimental conditions, but no significant differences in response times. Overall, these results provide clear evidence in favor of the multiple-systems account.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–287.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French, A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making? (pp. 1–40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Cohen, A., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic process: A parallel distributed processing account. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735–808.
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2002). A theory of the implicit nature of implicit learning. In R. M. French, A. Cleeremans, (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness. London: Psychology Press.
Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307.
Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., & Donovan, T., et al (2001). Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1043.
Frensch, P. A. & Rünger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 13–18.
Frensch, P. A., Haider, H., Rünger, D., Neugebauer, U., Voigt, S., & Werg, J. (2002). Verbal report of incidentally experienced environmental regularity: The route from implicit learning to verbal expression of what has been learned. In L. Jiménez, (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 335–366). Benjamins, New York.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Kinder, A., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: A single-system connectionist account. Psychological Review, 110, 728–744.
Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171.
Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979). Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of stress and emotion. New York: Norton.
Mandler, G. (2002). Consciousness recovered: Psychological functions and origins of conscious thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwarts, & D. Shapiro, (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory, vol 4 (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–330.
Perruchet, P., Bigand, E., & Benoit-Gonin, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 4–13.
Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 75–79.
Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with or without awareness. Learning & Memory, 1, 217–229.
Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 248–263.
Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1–38.
Rose, M., Haider, H., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2002). Medial temporal lobe involvement in implicit learning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 36, 1221–1231.
Rose, M., Haider, H., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2004). The relevance of the nature of learned associations for the differentiation of human memory systems. Learning & Memory, 11, 145–152.
Rosenthal, D. M. (2000a). Consciousness, content, and metacognitive judgements. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 203–214.
Rosenthal, D. M. (2000b). Metacognition and higher-order thoughts (extended response to commentaries). Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 231–242.
Scherer, K. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, T. Johnstone, (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shanks, D. R. (2003). Attention and awareness in “implicit” sequence learning. In L. Jiménez, (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 11–42). New York: Benjamins.
Shanks, D. R., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 362–367.
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.
Shanks, D. R., Wilkinson, L., & Channon, S. (2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 248–261.
Squire, L. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 232–243.
Thurstone, L. L., Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs,2, 94.
Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427, 352–355.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation and preserving of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. L. Medin, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 37 (p. 211–264). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002a). Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 325–348.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002b). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 96–115.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84–106.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141–165.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 547–565.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3–13.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b) The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14–33.
Wilkinson, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 354–369.
Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.
Willingham, D. B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531–534.
Winkielmann, P., Schwarz, N., & Nowak, A. (2002). Affect and processing dynamics. In S. Moore, M. Oaksford, (Eds.), Emotional cognition (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Woltz, D. J., Bell, B. G., Kyllonen, P. C., & Gardner, M. K. (1996). Memory for order of operations in the acquisition and transfer of sequential cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 438–457.
Woltz, D. J., Gardner, M. K., & Bell, B. G. (2000). Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: Strong-but-wrong sequence application. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 601–625.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haider, H., Frensch, P.A. The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation. Psychological Research 69, 399–411 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0209-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0209-2