Skip to main content
Log in

Passive water control at the surface of a superhydrophobic lichen

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some lichens have a super-hydrophobic upper surface, which repels water drops, keeping the surface dry but probably preventing water uptake. Spore ejection requires water and is most efficient just after rainfall. This study was carried out to investigate how super-hydrophobic lichens manage water uptake and repellence at their fruiting bodies, or podetia. Drops of water were placed onto separate podetia of Cladonia chlorophaea and observed using optical microscopy and cryo-scanning-electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) techniques to determine the structure of podetia and to visualise their interaction with water droplets. SEM and optical microscopy studies revealed that the surface of the podetia was constructed in a three-level structural hierarchy. By cryo-SEM of water-glycerol droplets placed on the upper part of the podetium, pinning of the droplet to specific, hydrophilic spots (pycnidia/apothecia) was observed. The results suggest a mechanism for water uptake, which is highly sophisticated, using surface wettability to generate a passive response to different types of precipitation in a manner similar to the Namib Desert beetle. This mechanism is likely to be found in other organisms as it offers passive but selective water control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

Cryo-:

Cryogen, typically at liquid nitrogen temperature

Fps:

Frames per second

References

  • Ahti T (1982) The morphological interpretation of Cladoniiform thalli in lichens. Lichenologist 14:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott W, Schimmel T, Wiersch S, Koch K, Brede M, Barczewski M, Walheim S, Weis A, Kaltenmaier A, Leder A, Bohn HF (2010) The Salvinia paradox: superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air-retention under water. Adv Mater 22:2325–2328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. T Faraday Soc 40:546–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culberson CF (1986) Biogenic relationships of the lichen substances in the framework of systematics. Bryologist 89:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culberson CF, Culberson WL, Johnson A (1988) Gene flow in lichens. Am J Bot 75:1135–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensikat HJ, Schulte AJ, Kock K, Barthlott W (2009) Droplets on superhydrophobic surface: visualization of the contact area by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Langmuir 25:13077–13083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck M, Jurgens SR, Brinkmann M, Herminghaus S (2008) Surface hydrophobicity causes SO2 tolerance in lichens. Ann Bot, London 101:531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henssen A, Jahns HM (1974) Lichenes. Eine Einführung in die Flechtenkunde. “Physiologie des Flechtenthallus”. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder CD (2007) Leaf water repellency as an adaptation to tropical montane cloud forest environments. Biotropica 39:767–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K, Bohn HF, Barthlott W (2009) Hierarchically sculptured plant surfaces and superhydrophobicity. Langmuir 54:114116–114120

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos M, Rascher U, Büdel B (2006) Functional characteristics of corticolous lichens in the understory of a tropical lowland rain forest. New Phytol 172:679–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson DW (1981) Differential wetting in some lichens and mosses: the role of morphology. Bryologist 84:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale G, Newton MI, Shirtcliffe NJ (2010) Immersed superhydrophobic surfaces: gas exchange, slip and drag reduction properties. Soft Matter 6:714–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot, London 79:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker AR, Lawrence CR (2001) Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414:33–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt FB (1969) Studies of the periodicity of spore discharge and germination in lichens. Bryologist 72:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt FB (1974) Lichen propagules. In: Ahmadjian V, Hale ME (eds) The lichens. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp 117–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Perry CC, Pyatt FB (2006a) Plastron properties of a superhydrophobic surface. Appl Phys Lett 89:104106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliffe NJ, Pyatt FB, Newton MI, McHale G (2006b) A lichen protected by a super-hydrophobic and breathable structure. J Plant Physiol 163:1193–1197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI (2009) Learning from superhydrophobic plants: the use of hydrophilic areas on superhydrophobic surfaces for droplet control. Langmuir 25:14121–14128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers F (1908) Ueber die Wasserversorgung der Flechten. Wissenschaftliche Beilage zum 38. Jahresbericht der Landw. Schule Marienberg mit Realabteilung zu Helmstedt, Bd.

  • Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wösten HAB (2001) Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:625–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wõsten HAB, de Vries OMH, Wessels JGH (1993) lnterfacial self-assembly of a funga1 hydrophobin into a hydrophobic rodlet layer. Plant Cell 5:1567–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond 95:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank H.J. Ensikat for technical assistance in SEM and performing of the cryo-preparation of the specimen, W. Barthlott for providing parts of the technical equipment for the studies performed at Bonn University (both Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Bonn University, Germany) and the EPSRC for funding NJS and CAEH under grants EP/E063489/1 and EP/H00704/1.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil James Shirtcliffe.

Additional information

To reduce confusion, throughout the paper, the term podetium/podetia is used for the wineglass-like structures found on many lichens. The term can also be used for just the leg of the structure but has not been used in this context here.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 222 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 9312 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 11420 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MPG 12992 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MPG 3480 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamlett, C.A.E., Shirtcliffe, N.J., Pyatt, F.B. et al. Passive water control at the surface of a superhydrophobic lichen. Planta 234, 1267–1274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1475-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1475-z

Keywords

Navigation